Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 503–514 | Cite as

Ant dominance in urban areas

  • Lloyd D. StringerEmail author
  • Andréa E. A. Stephens
  • David M. Suckling
  • John G. Charles


A survey was conducted to determine the distribution of dominant ants and factors that may influence their dominance in New Zealand cities. A new method of active ant trapping combining aspects of pitfall trapping and attraction to food baits was used to capture a sample of all ant species that attended baits. Fifty eight percent of the ant species present in New Zealand were recovered from 2202 traps, with multiple species catches in 245 traps. There was a strong latitudinal relationship in the distribution of ant species, with the proportion of native to introduced species increasing in favour of the native species as latitude increased (south). The presence of Linepithema humile, the Argentine ant, a numerically dominant species was associated with a significant reduction in the number of other ant species captured. With increased urbanisation, providing refugia at times of cool temperatures for warm temperate-sub tropical introduced ant species, their range may extend into the higher latitudes, further displacing native ants from New Zealand cities.


Introduced species Latitudinal gradient Species co-occurrence Linepithema humile Paratrechina Monomorium 



We would like to acknowledge the contribution from all staff (Plant and Food Research- formerly HortResearch and AsureQuality- formerly AgriQuality) who assisted in the 2001 survey. This work was funded by the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and New Zealand's Foundation for Research, Science and Technology through contract CO2X0501, the Better Border Biosecurity (B3) programme ( Phil Lester (Victoria University of Wellington, NZ) and two anonymous referees provided helpful comments on this manuscript.


  1. Andersen AN (1995) A classification of Australian ant communities, based on the functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance. J Biogeogr 22:15–29. doi: 10.2307/2846070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen AN (1997) Functional groups and patterns of organization in North American ant communities: a comparison with Australia. J Biogeogr 24:433–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.1997.00137.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerdá X, Retana J, Cros S (1997) Thermal disruption of transitive hierarchies in Mediterranean ant communities. J Anim Ecol 66:363–374. doi: 10.2307/5982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charles JG, Suckling DM, Allan DJ et al (2002) The distribution of Argentine ant in New Zealand: Can a ten-year old decision not to eradicate be re-visited? In: Goldson SL, Suckling DM (eds) Defending the green oasis: New Zealand biosecurity and science. New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc., Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 109–124Google Scholar
  5. Clark KM, Fisher BL, LeBuhn G (2008) The influence of urban park characteristics on ant (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) communities. Urban Ecosyst 11:317–334. doi: 10.1007/s11252-008-0065-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crooks JA, Soulé ME (1999) Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: causes and implications. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A (eds) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht, The Netherlands, pp 103–125Google Scholar
  7. Green OR (1990) Entomologist sets new record at Mt Smart or Iridomyrmex humilis established in New Zealand. Weta 13:14–16Google Scholar
  8. Green OR (1992) New Zealand ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Distribution and effects. In Symposium: Social and harmful insects. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Entomological Society of New Zealand, pp. 67-72Google Scholar
  9. Groves RH (2006) Are some weeds sleeping? Some concepts and reasons. Euphytica 148:111–120. doi: 10.1007/s10681-006-5945-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heterick BE, Casella J, Majer JD (2000) Influence of Argentine and coastal brown ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) invasions on ant communities in Perth gardens, Western Australia. Urban Ecosyst 4:277–292. doi: 10.1023/A:1015703815207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV et al (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:181–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kriticos DJ, Stephens AEA, Leriche A (2007) Effect of climate change on Oriental fruit fly in New Zealand and the Pacific. N Z Plant Prot 60:271–278Google Scholar
  13. Lester PJ (2006) Determinants for the successful establishment of exotic ants in New Zealand. Divers Distrib 11:279–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00169.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Minitab (2006) Version, LEAD Technologies IncGoogle Scholar
  15. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P O'Hara et al. (2008). vegan: Community Ecology Package.R package version1.13-2.
  16. Pacheco R, Vasconcelos HL (2007) Invertebrate conservation in urban areas: Ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Landsc Urban Plan 81:193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palmer TM (2003) Spatial habitat heterogeneity influences competition and coexistence in an African Acacia ant guild. Ecology 8:2843–2855. doi: 10.1890/02-0528 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Passera L (1994) Characteristics of tramp ants. In: Williams DF (ed) Exotic ants: biology. impact and the control of introduced species. Westview Press, Boulder Colorado, pp 23–43Google Scholar
  19. Rowles AD, O'Dowd DJ (2007) Interference competition by Argentine ants displaces native ants: Implications for biotic resistance to invasion. Biol Inv 9:73–85. doi: 10.1007/s10530-006-9009-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sanders NJ, Gordon DM (2003) Resource-dependant interactions and the organization of desert ant communities. Ecology 84:1024–1031. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1024:RIATOO]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarty M, Abbott KL, Lester PJ (2006) Habitat complexity facilitates coexistence in a tropical ant community. Oecologia 149:465–473. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0453-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM, Moder K et al (2006) Assessing ant assemblages: pitfall trapping versus nest counting (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Soc 53:274–281. doi: 10.1007/s00040-006-0869-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stringer LD, Lester PJ (2007) Foraging characteristics and intraspecific behaviour of the exotic species Monomorium sydneyense (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in New Zealand, with implications for its management. NZ J Zool 34:25–34Google Scholar
  24. Suarez AV, Bolger DT, Case TJ (1998) Effects of fragmentation and invasion on native ant communities in coastal and southern California. Ecology 79:2041–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sutherst RW, Maywald G (2005) A climate model of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Implications for invasion of new regions, particularly Oceania. Environ Entomol 34:317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ward DF (2005) Changes to the classification of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Weta 30:16–18Google Scholar
  27. Ward DF (2007) Modelling the potential geographic distribution of invasive ant species in New Zealand. Biol Inv 9:723–735. doi: 10.1007/s10530-006-9072-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ward DF, Beggs JR, Clout MN et al (2006) The diversity and origin of exotic ants arriving in New Zealand via human-mediated dispersal. Divers Distrib 12:601–609. doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00270.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ward DF, Harris RJ, Stanley MC (2005) Human-mediated range expansion of Argentine ants Linepithema humile (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in New Zealand. Sociobiology 45:401–407Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lloyd D. Stringer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andréa E. A. Stephens
    • 1
    • 2
  • David M. Suckling
    • 1
  • John G. Charles
    • 3
  1. 1.The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research LimitedChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research LimitedAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations