Abstract
The expansion of urban areas into native habitat can have profound effects on avian populations and communities, yet little is known regarding the effects of urban features on avian reproductive success. The objective of this study was to examine the reproduction of an urban-enhanced species, the mourning dove, to determine how tree and urban landscape features affect nest-site selection and nest success. Mourning dove nests were located by systematically searching potential nest sites on a weekly basis from late-March through mid-September in 2003 and 2004. A total of 1,288 mourning dove nests were located and monitored on the Texas A&M University Campus. Of these nests, 337 (26.6%) were successful (fledged, ≥1). An equal number of potential nest sites were randomly generated in ArcGIS and assigned to non-nest trees to evaluate habitat variables associated with nest-site selection. Mourning dove nests were located in trees with a larger canopy diameter and diameter at breast height (DBH) than the computer generated potential nests and nest trees were located closer to roads and farther from buildings than non-nest trees. Within the study area, nest success was predominately influenced by the proximity of urban features with successful nests being located closer to roads and farther from buildings than unsuccessful nests.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armbruster MJ (1973) Evaluation of the mourning dove call-count as a reliable index to population levels in the field. Thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519
Bivings AE IV (1980) Breeding ecology of the mourning dove on the Texas A&M University Campus. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Bolger DT (2001) Urban birds: population, community, and landscape approaches. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 155–177
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information–theoretic approach. Springer, New York, NY
Caldwell LD (1964) Dove production and nest site selection in southern Michigan. J Wildl Manage 28:732–737
Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effect on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69
Chapman KA, Reich PB (2007) Land use and habitat gradients determine bird community diversity and abundance in suburban, rural and reserve landscapes of Minnesota, USA. Biol Conserv 135:527–541
Clergeau P, Jokimaki J, Snep R (2006) Using hierarchical levels for urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 12:660–661
Coon RA, Nichols JD, Percival HF (1981) Importance of structural stability to success of mourning dove nests. Auk 98:389–391
Crooks KR, Suarez AV, Bolger DT (2004) Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biol Conserv 115:451–462
DeGraaf RM, Wentworth JM (1986) Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities. Urban Ecol 9:399–412
Emlen JT (1974) An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76:184–197
Fernández-Juricic E (2000) Local and regional effects of human disturbance on forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Condor 102:247–255
Fraterrigo JM, Wiens JA (2005) Bird communities of the Colorado Rocky Mountains along a gradient of exurban development. Landsc Urban Plan 71:263–275
George RR (1975) Mourning doves in Texas: life history, habitat needs, and management suggestions. Federal Aid Project Number W-115-R. Texas Parks and Wildlife, Austin, TX
Grue CE, Reid RR, Silvy NJ (1983) Correlation of habitat variables with mourning dove call counts in Texas. J Wildl Manage 52:153–157
Guthery FS, Bingham RL (2007) A primer on interpreting regression models. J Wildl Manage 71:684–692
Guthery FS, Brennan LA, Peterson MJ, Lusk JJ (2005) Information theory in wildlife science: critique and viewpoint. J Wildl Manage 69:457–465
Hanson HC, Kossack CW (1963) The mourning dove in Illinois. Technical Bulletin number 2. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL
Hostetler ME, Knowles-Yanez K (2003) Land use, scale, and bird distributions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Landsc Urban Plan 62:55–68
Jenness J (2005) Distance matrix (dist_mat_jen.avx) extension for ArcView 3.x, v. 2. Jenness Enterprises. http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/dist_matrix.htm
Jokimaki J (1999) Occurrence of breeding bird species in urban parks: effects of park structure and broad-scale variables. Urban Ecosyst 3:21–34
Kark S, Iwaniuk A, Schalimtzek A, Banker E (2007) Living in the city: can anyone become an ‘urban exploiter’? J Biogeogr 34:638–651
Lewis JC (1993) Foods and feeding ecology. In: Baskett TS, Sayre MW, Tomlinson RE, Mirarchi RE (eds) Ecology and management of the mourning dove. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA, pp 181–204
Martin TE, Geupel GR (1993) Nest-monitoring plots: methods for locating nests and monitoring success. J Field Ornithol 64:507–519
Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 19–47
Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (2001) A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends terms, and approaches. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Boston, MA, pp 1–18
Mathewson HA (2002) Nest site selection portioning among sympatric white-winged mourning and inca doves in Mason, TX. Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Melles S, Glenn S, Martin K (2003) Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species–environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol 7:5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol7/iss1/art5/
Norman GW, Conner MM, Pack JC, White GC (2004) The effects of fall hunting on survival of male wild turkeys in Virginia and West Virginia. J Wildl Manage 68:393–404
Rosenberg KV, Terrill SB, Rosenberg GH (1987) Value of suburban habitats to desert riparian birds. Wilson Bull 99:642–654
Savard JPL, Clergeau P, Mennechez G (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landsc Urban Plan 48:131–142
Sayre MW, Silvy NJ (1993) Nesting and production. In: Baskett TS, Sayre MW, Tomlinson RE, Mirarchi RE (eds) Ecology and management of the mourning dove. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA, pp 81–104
Simonoff JS (2003) Analyzing categorical data. Springer, New York, NY
Swank WG (1955) Nesting and production of the mourning dove in Texas. Ecology 36:495–505
United Nations (2008) World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision population database. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York, NY
Yahner RH (1983) Site-related nesting success of mourning doves and American robins in shelterbelts. Wilson Bull 95:573–580
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank the students whose hard work and dedication made this project possible. We also want to make a special note of the contribution of Dale Kubenka who assisted in the management of the project, including maintenance of the information database and GIS resources, and Jay Roberson for his support of this research. Funding and support was provided by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muñoz, A.M., McCleery, R.A., Lopez, R.R. et al. Nesting ecology of mourning doves in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 11, 257–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-008-0066-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-008-0066-7