Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 409–422 | Cite as

Estimates of air pollution mitigation with green plants and green roofs using the UFORE model

Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of green roofs and green walls on air pollution in urban Toronto. The research looked at the synergistic effects on air pollution mitigation of different combinations of vegetation by manipulating quantities of trees, shrubs, green roofs and green walls in the study area. The effects of these manipulations were simulated with the Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) model developed by the USDA Forest Service Northeastern Regional Station. While UFORE contains several modules, Module—D quantifies the levels of air pollution for contaminants such as NO2, S02, CO, PM10 and ozone as well as hourly pollution removal rates and the economic value of pollutant removal. Six vegetation scenarios were developed within the Toronto study area to compare different subsets of vegetation and their effect on air contaminants. Results of the study indicate that grass on roofs (extensive green roofs) could augment the effect of trees and shrubs in air pollution mitigation, placing shrubs on a roof (intensive green roofs) would have a more significant impact. By extension, a 10–20% increase in the surface area for green roofs on downtown buildings would contribute significantly to the social, financial and environmental health of all citizens.

Keywords

Green roof Air quality Air contaminants Trees Shrubs UFORE Model Urban Planning Smart growth Benefits Density 

References

  1. Akbari H (2002) Heat island reduction: an overview—effects of trees and implementation issues. Presentation by Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania, LAPR 760, November 13th, 2002Google Scholar
  2. Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Taha H (2001) Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol Energy 70(3):295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldocchi DD, Hicks BB, Camara P (1987) A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces. Atmos Environ 21:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bass B (2001) Addressing urban environmental problems with green roofs. Encyclopaedia of global environmental change, vol. 3. Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass B, Baskaran B (2001) Evaluating rooftop and vertical gardens as an adaptation strategy for urban areas. National Research Council Canada Technical Report NRCC-46737, http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ircpubs
  6. Bidwell RGS, Fraser DE (1972) Carbon monoxide uptake and metabolism by leaves. Can J Bot 50:1435–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheney C, Rosenzweig C (2003) Green roofs and environmental restoration: towards an ecological infrastructure for New York City; Earth Pledge Foundation/NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies; Proceedings from Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities, First North American Green Roof Infrastructure Conference, May 29th and 30th, Chicago, 2003Google Scholar
  8. Chiotti Q, Urquizo N (1999) The relative magnitude of the impacts and effects of GHG related emission reductions. Report prepared by Pollution Probe, for Environment Canada ISBN: 0-662-28845-9. Catalogue No: En 56-150/2000EGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiotti Q, Morton I, Ogilvie K, Maarouf A, Hellecher M (2002) Toward an adaptation action plan. Climate change and health in the Toronto—Niagara Region—Summary for policy makers. Prepared for the Science, Impacts and Adaptation Issues Table, Government of Canada, and the Toronto—Niagara Region Study on Atmospheric ChangeGoogle Scholar
  10. Colbeck I, Harrison RM (1985) Dry deposition of ozone: some measurements of deposition velocity and of vertical profiles to 100 metres. Atmos Environ 19(11):1807–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hosker RP Jr, Lindberg SE (1982) Review: atmospheric deposition and plant assimilation of gases and particles. Atmos Environ 16(5):889–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson J, Newton J (1996) Building green, a guide for using plants on roofs walls and pavement, the London ecology unit, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Kenney WA (2001) The environmental role of Toronto’s urban forest. University of Toronto Department of Forestry, Toronto, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  14. Lovett GM (1994) Atmospheric deposition of nutrients and pollutants in North America: an ecological perspective. Ecol Appl 4:629–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA (1994) Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Gen Tech Rep NE -186. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 5 Radnor Corporate Center, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  16. McPherson EG, Scott KI, Simpson JR (1998) Estimating cost effectiveness of residential yard trees for improving air quality in Sacramento, California, using existing models. Atmos Environ 32(1):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Minke G, Witter G (1982) Haeuser mit Gruenem Pelz, Ein Handbuch zur Hausbegruenung, Verlag Dieter Fricke GmbH, Frankfurt (partially translated in English)Google Scholar
  18. Murray FJ, Marsh L, Bradford PA (1994) New York State energy plan Vol II issue reports. New York State Energy Office, Albany NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Nowak DJ (1995) Trees, pollute? A TREE explains it all. In: Kollin C, Barratt M (eds) In Proceedings of the national urban forestry conference. Washington, DC American Forests, pp 28–30Google Scholar
  20. Nowak DJ, Crane DE (1998) The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions. Integrated Tools Proceedings. Boise, Idaho, USA, August 16–20thGoogle Scholar
  21. Nowak DJ, Dwyer JF (2001) Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. In: Handbook of Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast. Kluwer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Nowak DJ, McHale PJ, Ibarra M, Crane D, Stevens JC, Luley C (1998) Modeling the effects of urban vegetation on air pollution. Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XII . In: Sven-Erick Gryning, Nadine Chaumerliac (eds). Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Nowak DJ, Civerolo KL, Rao ST, Sistla G, Juley CJ, Crane DE (2000) A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmos Environ 34:1601–1613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ontario Medical Association (2001) Ontario’s air: years of stagnation. www.oma.org/phealth.report. accessed July 2004.
  25. Pederson JR, Massman WJ, Mahrt L, Delany A, Oncley S, den Hartog G, Neumann HH, Mickle RE, Shaw RH, Paw KT, Grantz DA, MacPherson JI, Desjardins R, Schuepp PH, Pearson R Jr, Arcado TE (1995) California ozone deposition experiment: methods, results, and opportunities. Atmos Environ 29(21):3115–3132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith FW, Sampson DA, Long JN (1991) Comparison of leaf area index estimates from allometrics and measured light interception. For Sci 37(6):1682–1688Google Scholar
  27. Tan PW, Sia A (2005) A pilot study green roof project in Singapore. Proceedings from the third Greening Rooftops for Healthy Cities. Washington DC, May 2005Google Scholar
  28. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1995) PCRAMMIT users guide. Research Triangle Park, NC. US Environmental Protection Agency, p 53Google Scholar
  29. Wesely ML (1989) Parameterization for surface resistance to gaseous dry deposition in regional scale numerical models. Atmos Environ 23:1293–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whittaker RH, Woodwell GM (1967) Surface area relations of woody plants and forest communities. Am J Bot 54:931–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winfield MS (2005) Building sustainable communities in Ontario: a provincial progress report. The Pembina Institute Sustainable Energy Solutions. Drayton Valley, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  32. Yaffe B (2004) Toronto public health. Air pollution burden of illness in Toronto: 2004 Summary. Toronto: City of TorontoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Social InnovationTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Adaptation and Impacts Research Group (AIRG), Atmospheric and Climate Science Directorate (ACSD)Institute for Environmental Studies University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations