Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urban wildlife ecology and conservation:A brief history of the discipline

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban wildlife ecology and conservation is a discipline worldwide in scope. Although some attention was given the subject in the early to mid-1900s, most activity in the field is of more recent origin. Many European countries have active programs and activities, including the United Kingdom-Man and the Biosphere (UK-MAB) Urban Forum and The Wildlife Trusts of England, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization's MAB Program, and urban ecology research in Germany and Poland. The Netherlands' concept of “ecological landscapes” introduced a new approach to design of urban open space. Durban, South Africa followed with “D'MOSS,” a metropolitan open space system founded on the principles of island biogeography theory. The park connector network of Singapore combines principles of conservation biology and landscape planning. Urban wildlife programs and activities exist in the United States at the federal, state, and local levels as well as in private conservation organizations. The Wildlife Society established an Urban Affairs and Regional Planning Committee in the mid-1970s that later became the Urban Wildlife Committee and then evolved into the Urban Wildlife Working Group. Urban wildlife research is providing knowledge of wildlife and plant populations and communities in urban areas that hopefully will lead to better understanding and greater sustainability of urban ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abella, S.R., Jaeger, J.F., Gehring, D.H., Jacksy, R.G., Menard, K.S. and High, K.A. (2001) Restoring historic plant communities in the Oak Openings region of northwest Ohio. Ecological Restoration 19, 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C.E. and Grammer, M. (2000) A study to determine the degree of preparedness by academia and state wildlife agencies to facilitate urban wildlife management. Presented at the symposium “Thirty Years of Urban Wildlife Management: Directions for a New Millennium,” held in conjunction with The Wildlife Society's Annual Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee, 12–16 September. (Abstract published)

  • Adams, L.W. (1988) Some recent advances in urban wildlife research and management. In Proceedings of the Third Southeastern Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Symposium (R.R. Odom, K.A. Riddleberger and J.C. Ozier, eds.), pp. 213–224. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Social Circle, USA.

  • Adams, L.W. (1989) National Institute for Urban Wildlife. Environmental Conservation 16, 276–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, L.W. (1994) Urban Wildlife Habitats: A Landscape Perspective. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, L.W. and Dove, L.E. (1984) Urban Wetlands for Stormwater Control and Wildlife Enhancement. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, L.W. and Dove, L.E. (1989) Wildlife Reserves and Corridors in the Urban Environment: A Guide to Ecological Landscape Planning and Resources Conservation. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, L.W. and Leedy, D.L., (eds.) (1987) Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, L.W. and Leedy, D.L., (eds.) (1991) Wildlife Conservation in Metropolitan Environments. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, L.W. and VanDruff, L.W. (1998) Introduction. Urban Ecosystems 2, 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, L.W., Hadidian, J. and Flyger, V. (2004) Movement and mortality of translocated urban-suburban grey squirrels. Animal Welfare 13, 45–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, L.W., Leedy, D.L. and McComb, W.C. (1987) Urban wildlife research and education in North American colleges and universities. Wildlife Society Bulletin 15, 591–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, L.W., VanDruff, L.W. and Luniak, M. (2005) Managing urban habitats and wildlife. In Techniques for Wildlife Investigations and Management(C.E. Braun, ed.), sixth edition, pp. 714–739. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J.W. and Coffin, R.W. (1980) Breeding bird populations from forest to suburbia after thirty-seven years. American Birds 34, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R.A. and Goins, A.E. (1987) Habitat enhancement techniques for the El Segundo blue butterfly: an urban endangered species. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), pp. 173–181. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology. (2004) Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology. (http://arcue.botany.unimelb.edu.au).

  • Baines, C. (1985) How to Make a Wildlife Garden. Elm Tree Books, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, C. (1986) The Wild Side of Town. Elm Tree Books and BBC Publications, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baines, C. and Smart, J. (1991) A Guide to Habitat Creation. Packard Publishing Limited, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, G.M.A. (1987) European approaches to urban wildlife programs. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), pp. 183–190. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, L.A. (1972) Breeding bird species diversity in relation to increasing urbanization. Bird Study 19, 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, S.R. and Osborne, D.R. (1982) Effects of urbanization on avian community organization. Condor 84, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belensky, B.L. and Norman, P.C. (2000) The role of local government in urban wildlife management: the Howard County, Md. model. Presented at the symposium “Thirty Years of Urban Wildlife Management: Directions for a New Millennium,” held in conjunction with The Wildlife Society's Annual Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee, 12–16 September. (Abstract published)

  • Bender, K.C. (2004) Texas wildscapes: landscaping for wildlife. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Urban Wildlife Conservation(W.W. Shaw, L.K. Harris and L. VanDruff, eds.), pp. 267–269. University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.

  • Bennitt, R. (1946) Summarization of the eleventh North American Wildlife Conference. Transactions of the North American Wildlife Conference 11, 511–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R.B. (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6, 506–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R.B. and Launer, A.E. (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation 80, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolen, E.G. and Robinson, W.L. (2003) Wildlife Ecology and Management. 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briffett, C., Yuen, B. and Marrs, C.B. (2000) Multiple-Use Green Corridors in the City: Guidelines for Implementation. Nature Society, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briffett, C., Kong, L., Yuen, B. and Sodhi, N. (1997) The Planning and Ecology of Park Connector Systems in Urban Areas: Pilot Study Based on Ulu Pandan Canal, Clementi, Singapore. National University of Singapore, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briffett, C., Kong, L., Yuen, B. and Sodhi, N. (1999) Nature in Urban Areas: the Planning and Ecology of Green Corridor Systems in Singapore. National University of Singapore, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, J. (1998) Natural Landscapes. DK Publishing, Inc., New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T. and Wortman, D. (1999) Protecting Open Space: A Review of Successful Programs and Landowner Perspectives. Metro, Portland, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.M., D'Amico, D.R., Carpenter, A.T. and Andrews, D. (2001) Restoration of montane ponderosa pine forests in the Colorado Front Range: A forest ecosystem management plan for the city of Boulder. Ecological Restoration 19, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. (1968) Man and Nature in the City. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustad, L.K. (1987) Historical perspective. In Health Benefits of Pets: Program and Abstracts, pp. 19–20. NIH Technology Assessment Workshop, 10–11 September, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

  • Clergeau, P., Savard, J.-P.L., Mennechez, G. and Falardeau, G. (1998) Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100, 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P.A. (1989) Historical changes in a suburban herpetofauna in DuPage County, Illinois. Bulletin of the Chicago Herpetological Society 24, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, M.R. (2001) Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts: the Science of Wildlife Damage Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasmann, R.F. (1966) Wildlife and the new conservation. The Wildlife Society News 105, 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, S.P. (1967) The role of wildlife in an urban environment. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 32, 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.M. (2000) Urban wildlife programs: an overview and the Texas model. Presented at the symposium “Thirty Years of Urban Wildlife Management: Directions for a New Millennium,” held in conjunction with The Wildlife Society's Annual Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee, 12–16 September. (Abstract published)

  • Dawe, G.F.M. (1990) The Urban Environment: A Sourcebook for the 1990s. Centre for Urban Ecology, Birmingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGraaf, R.M. (1987) Urban wildlife habitat research-application to landscape design. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), pp. 107–111. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGraaf, R.M. (1991) Winter foraging guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities. Landscape and Urban Planning 21, 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGraaf, R.M. and Wentworth, J.M. (1986) Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities. Urban Ecology 9, 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekelmann, J. and Schuster, R. (1982) Natural Landscaping: Designing with Native Plant Communities. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkle, F.H. (1987) Urban wildlife and the Fish and Wildlife Service: meeting a growing challenge. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.). pp. 5–7. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J.T. (1974) An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona: derivation, structure, and regulation. Condor 76, 184–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitter, R.S.R. (1945) London's Natural History. Bloomsbury Books, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germaine, S.S. and Wakeling, B.F. (2001) Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Biological Conservation 97, 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S.M. (1986) User characteristics and response to vegetation in neighbourhood parks. Arboricultural Journal 10, 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, D.A. (1991) Wildlife in cities. In Perspectives in Urban Ecology (E.A. Webb and S.Q. Foster, eds.), pp. 7–21. Denver Museum of Natural History, Denver, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greater London Council. (1984) Ecology and Nature Conservation in London. Ecology Handbook 1. Greater London Council, London. UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadidian, J. and Smith, S. (2001) Urban wildlife. In The State of the Animals: 2001 (D.J. Salem and A.N. Rowan, eds.), pp. 165-182. The Humane Society of the United States, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadidian, J., Hodge, G.R. and Grandy, J.W. (eds.) (1997) Wild Neighbors: the Humane Approach to Living with Wildlife. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (1977) Distribution, habitat utilization and age structure of a suburban fox (Vulpes vulpes) population. Mammalian Review 7, 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (1981) The food of suburban foxes (Vulpes vulpes), with special reference to London. Mammalian Review 11, 151–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. and Rayner, J.M.V. (1986) Urban fox (Vulpes vulpes) population estimates and habitat requirements in several British cities. Journal of Animal Ecology 55, 575–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hench, J.E., Van Ness, K. and Gibbs, R. (1987) Development of a natural resources planning and management process. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), pp. 29–35. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck, M.C. (1991) Metropolitan wildlife refuge system: a strategy for regional natural resource planning. In Wildlife Conservation in Metropolitan Environments (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), pp. 225–229. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokimäki, J. and Suhonen, J. (1993) Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison. Ornis Fennica 70, 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.N. and Nealson, T. (2003) Management of aggressive Australian magpies by translocation. Wildlife Research 30, 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, J. (1959) A Natural History of New York. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F. and Faber Taylor, A. (2004) A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health 94, 1580–1586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leedy, D.L. (1979) An Annotated Bibliography on Planning and Management for Urban-suburban Wildlife. FWS/OBS-79/25. Fish and Wildlife Service, U. S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., USA.

  • Leedy, D.L. and Adams, L.W. (1984) A Guide to Urban Wildlife Management. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leedy, D.L., Franklin, T.M. and Maestro, R.M. (1981) Planning for Urban Fishing and Waterfront Recreation. FWS/OBS-80/35. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., USA.

  • Leedy, D.L., Maestro, R.M. and Franklin, T.M. (1978) Planning for Wildlife in Cities and Suburbs. FWS/OBS-77/66 Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., USA.

  • Leopold. A. (1933) Game Management. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, R. (1999) Landscaping for Wildlife in the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luniak, M. (1990) Avifauna of cities in central and eastern Europe—results of the international inquiry. In Urban Ecological Studies in Central and Eastern Europe (M. Luniak, ed.), pp. 131–149. Ossolineum, Wroclaw, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J.R. and Leedy, D.L. (1984) The status of urban wildlife programs. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 49, 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maestas, J. D., Knight, R.L. and Gilgert, W.C. (2003) Biodiversity across a rural land-use gradient. Conservation Biology 17, 1425–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff, J.M., Bowman, R. and Donnelly, R. (eds.) (2001) Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsil, M.A. and Feller, M.J. (1996) Natural areas restoration in New York City: a bite of the apple. Restoration & Management Notes 14, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery County Department of Park and Planning. (2004) Natural Resources Division (www.mc-mncppc.org/naturalresources).

  • Murphy, D. D. (1988) Challenges to biological diversity in urban areas. In Biodiversity (E.O. Wilson, ed.), pp. 71–76. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service. (2004) Center for Urban Ecology (www.nps.gov/cue/).

  • National Science Foundation. (2004) Cityscapes Are Landscapes, Too (www.nsf.gov).

  • National Wildlife Federation. (1974) Gardening With Wildlife: A Complete Guide to Attracting and Enjoying the Fascinating Creatures in Your Backyard. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Wildlife Federation. (2004) Backyard Wildlife Habitat™ Program (www.nwf.org).

  • Nilon, C.H., Rowntree, R.A. and Natural Resources Group. (1987) Wildlife management in natural areas of New York City parks. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), p. 239. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

  • Penland, S. (1987) The urban wildlife program of the Washington Department of Game. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), p. 241. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D.C. (1994) The design of an urban open-space network for the city of Durban (South Africa). Environmental Conservation 21, 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolando, A., Maffei, G., Pulcher, C. and Giuso, A. (1997) Avian community structure along an urbanization gradient. Italian Journal of Zoology 64, 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson, D.J. and Jones, D.N. (2002) Variation in breeding parameters of the Australian magpie Gymnorhina tibicen in suburban and rural environments. Urban Ecosystems 6, 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollinson, D.J., O'Leary, R. and Jones, D.N. (2003) The practice of wildlife feeding in suburban Brisbane. Corella 27, 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, H., Vala, J. and Schaefer, V. (2002) Importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restoration Ecology 10, 368-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, A.R. (1987) Holland and the Ecological Landscapes 1973-1987. Delft University Press, Delft, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savard, J.-P.L., Clergeau, P. and Mennechez, G. (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 48, 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, W.W. and Supplee, V. (1987) Wildlife conservation in rapidly expanding metropolitan areas: informational, institutional, and economic constraints and solutions. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), pp. 191–197. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenstone, J.C. (1912) The flora of London building sites. Journal of Botany 50, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, F.W. (1967) Wildlife habitat in urban and suburban environments. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 32, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp, H. (1990) Urban Ecology—the Case of Berlin. D. Reimer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Humane Society of the United States. (2004) Urban wildlife—our wild neighbors. (www.hsus.org).

  • The Trust for Public Land. (1994) Healing America's Cities: Why We Must Invest in Urban Parks. The Trust for Public Land, San Francisco, California, USA.

  • The Wildlife Trusts. (2003) (www.wildlifetrusts.org).

  • The Wildlife Society. (2003) Wildlife policy statement – urban wildlife. (www.wildlife.org).

  • Thompson, G.F. and Steiner, F.R. (eds.) (1997) Ecological Design and Planning. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, D.H. and Witter, D.J. (2001) Developing urban programs in Missouri. In Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management in North America (D.J. Decker, T.L. Brown, and W.F. Siemer, eds.), pp. 200–201. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufts, C. (1987) The National Wildlife Federation's urban wildlife programs... working for the nature of tomorrow™. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), pp. 241–242. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufts, C. and Loewer, P. (1995) Gardening for Wildlife: How to Create a Beautiful Backyard Habitat for Birds, Butterflies and Other Wildlife. Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pennsylvania, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twiss, R.H. (1967) Wildlife in the metropolitan landscape. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 32, 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylka, D.L., Schaefer, J.M. and Adams, L.W. (1987) Guidelines for implementing urban wildlife programs under state conservation agency administration. In Integrating Man and Nature in the Metropolitan Environment (L.W. Adams and D.L. Leedy, eds.), pp. 199–205. National Institute for Urban Wildlife, Columbia, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK-MAB Urban Forum. (2003) Annual report 2002/03 & work programme 2003/04 (www.ukmaburbanforum.org.uk).

  • Ulrich, R.S. (1979) Visual landscape and psychological well-being. Landscape Research 4, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2003) The MAB programme (www.unesco.org/mab).

  • Urban Ecology Australia. (2003) Urban Ecology Australia (www.urbanecology.org.au).

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2003) Urban Conservation Treaty for Migratory Birds (http://birds.fws.gov/urbantreaty).

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2004) America's National Wildlife Refuge System (http://refuges.fws.gov).

  • VanDruff, L.W. and Rowse, R.N. (1986) Habitat association of mammals in Syracuse, New York. Urban Ecology 9, 413–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanDruff, L.W., Bolen, E.G. and San Julian, G.J. (1994) Management of urban wildlife. In Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats (T.A. Bookhout, ed.), pp. 507–530. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott, C.F. (1974) Changes in bird life in Cambridge, Massachusetts from 1860 to 1964. Auk 91, 151–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, J.E. and Tylka, D. (1984) Urban biology: the Missouri prototype. In Proceedings—Workshop on Management of Nongame Species and Ecological Communities (W.C. McComb, ed.). University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.

  • Zalewski, A. (1994) A comparative study of breeding bird populations and associated landscape character, Toruń, Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning 29, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, S., Maurer, U., Schmitz, S. and Sukopp, H. (2003) Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential for nature conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 62, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lowell W. Adams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, L.W. Urban wildlife ecology and conservation:A brief history of the discipline. Urban Ecosyst 8, 139–156 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-005-4377-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-005-4377-7

Keywords

Navigation