Abstract
Teachers form expectations that can influence their students’ performance, and there are a variety of ways these expectations can be communicated. In the current study, we tested a novel method for communicating expectations via examples of student work—examples that contain basic, entry-level work and communicate low, but manageable expectations or examples that contain complex, advanced-level work and communicate high and challenging expectations. Across three semesters, 91 college students in a data management course completed a class assignment that involved exploratory coding activities. Prior to the assignment, students were randomly assigned to view basic or advanced examples of student work. Students assigned to the advanced-examples condition reported higher perceptions of task difficulty and frustration, but they also exhibited higher levels of performance in terms of the complexity of their own work. Results suggest that setting challenging expectations can create a desirable difficulty that ultimately benefits students’ performance in an authentic learning environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aksop, A., & Özdemir, D. (2022). Classroom teachers’ opinions about peer learning and characteristics of qualified teachers. Educational Research Quarterly,45(4), 46–78.
Alonso-Tapia, J., & Ruiz-Díaz, M. (2022). School climate and teachers’ motivational variables: Effects on teacher satisfaction and classroom motivational climate perceived by middle school students. A cross-cultural study. Psicología Educativa,28(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2022a4
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research,70(2), 181–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181
Mills, R. J. (2001). Analyzing instructional software using a computer-tracking system. Information Technology Learning and Performance Journal,19(1), 1535–1536.
Ben-Gan, I. (2016). T-SQL fundamentals (3rd ed.). Microsoft Press.
Bergold, S., & Steinmayr, R. (2023). Teacher judgments predict developments in adolescents’ school performance, motivation, and life satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology,115(4), 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000786
Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). Worth Publishers.
Booth, J. L., McGinn, K. M., Young, L. K., & Barbieri, C. (2015). Simple practice doesn’t always make perfect: Evidence from the worked example effect. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences,2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215601691
Braun, C. (1976). Teacher expectation: Sociopsychological dynamics. Review of Educational Research,46(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170038
Century, J. (2023). The power of teachers’ perceptions. Phi Delta Kappan,104(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217231161540
Clark, R. E. (1998). The CaNE model of motivation to learn and to work: A two-state process of goal commitment and effort. In J. Lowyck (Ed.), Trends in corporate training. University of Leuven Press.
Cusi, A., & Olsher, S. (2021). Design of classroom discussions and the role of the expert in fostering an effective and aware use of examples as a means of argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,20(7), 1573–1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10201-1
Edwards, O. V., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2022). Social presence and teacher involvement: The link with expectancy, task value, and engagement. The Internet and Higher Education,55(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100869
Friedrich, A., Flunger, B., Nagengast, B., Jonkmann, K., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Pygmalion effects in the classroom: Teacher expectancy effects on students’ math achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology,41(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.10.006
Fyfe, E. R., & Brown, S. A. (2020). This is easy, you can do it! Feedback during mathematics problem solving is more beneficial when students expect to succeed. Instructional Science,48(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-019-09501-5
Gardner, J., Barclay, M., Kong, Y., & LeVally, C. (2020). Designing an accelerated graduate evaluation course using the first principles of instruction and interactive media. Journal of Educational Technology Systems,48(4), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519893049
Harris, M. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin,97(3), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.363
Hoogerheide, V., Loyens, S. M. M., & van Gog, T. (2016). Learning from video modeling examples: Does gender matter? Instructional Science,44(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9360-y
Hoogerheide, V., van Wermeskerken, M., Loyens, S. M. M., & van Gog, T. (2016). Learning from video modeling examples: Content kept equal, adults are more effective models than peers. Learning and Instruction,44, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.004
Hoxby, C. (2000). Peer effects in the classroom: Learning from gender and race variation [NBER Working Paper No. 7867]. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w7867/w7867.pdf
Jackson, C. K., & Bruegmann, E. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,1(4), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.4.85
Jaremus, F., Gore, J., Prieto-Rodriguez, E., & Fray, L. (2020). Girls are still being counted out: Teacher expectations of high-level mathematics students. Educational Studies in Mathematics,105(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09986-9
Jiang, Y. (2022). Apply small teaching tactics in an introductory programming course: Impact on learning performance. Journal of Information Systems Education,32(2), 149–158.
Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review,9(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1999). Encouraging the heart: A leader’s guide to rewarding and recognizing others. Jossey-Bass.
Loehr, A., Rittle-Johnson, B., Durkin, K., & Star, J. R. (2020). Does calling it Morgan’s way reduce student learning? Evaluating the effect of person-presentation during comparison and discussion of worked examples in mathematics classrooms. Applied Cognitive Psychology,34(4), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3670
Mantei, J., & Kervin, L. (2021). Examining children’s interpretations of teacher expectations in the literacy classroom. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy,44(2), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03652071
Menon, P. (2023). Teaching tip: An example-based instructional method to develop students’ problem-solving efficacy in an introductory programming course. Journal of Information Systems Education,34(1), 1–15.
Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models. Erlbaum Associates.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development,50(3), 1042–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02505024
Merrill, M. D., & Gilbert, C. G. (2008). Effective peer interaction in a problem-centered instructional strategy. Distance Education,29(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802154996
Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review,8(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., Panigrahi, P. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Role of internet self-efficacy and interactions on blended learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Information Systems,62(6), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2021.2004565
Patall, E. A., Hooper, S., Vasquez, A. C., Pituch, K. A., & Steingut, R. R. (2018). Science class is too hard: Perceived difficulty, disengagement, and the role of teacher autonomy support from a daily diary perspective. Learning and Instruction,58, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.004
Reyna, C. (2008). Ian is intelligent but Leshaun is lazy: Antecedents and consequences of attributional stereotypes in the classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education,23(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172752
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics,22(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27
Rosenthal, R. J., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and pupils’ intellectual development. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Scheiter, K. (2020). Embracing complexity in research on learning from examples and from problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology,34(4), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3702
Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology,77(3), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.313
Siggard, R., Dupin-Bryant, P. A., Mills, R. J., & Olsen, D. H. (2022). Teaching tip: Using SQL to create and mine large, customizable datasets. Journal of Information Systems Education,33(3), 209–228.
Swoyer, S. (2016). Beer and diapers: The impossible correlation. Transforming Data with Intelligence. https://tdwi.org/articles/2016/11/15/beer-and-diapers-impossible-correlation.aspx
Szumski, G., & Karwowski, M. (2019). Exploring the Pygmalion effect: The role of teacher expectations, academic self-concept, and class context in students’ math achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology,59(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101787
Tan, P. H., Ting, C. Y., & Ling, S. W. (2009). Learning difficulties in programming courses: Undergraduates’ perspective and perception. International Conference on Computer Technology and Development,1, 42–46.
Tenenbaum, H. R., & Ruck, M. D. (2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,99(2), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253
Toksoy, S., & Acar, F. E. (2019). The influence of teacher expectancy improvement strategies on student attitude and achievement in English courses (an action research sample). Education Sciences,9(20), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010020
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Xi, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2020). Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship. Journal of Theory Social Behavior,51(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260
Zaslavsky, O. (2019). There is more to examples than meets the eye: Thinking with and through mathematical examples in different settings. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,53(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.10.001
Zhang, X. P., Crabtree, J. D., Terwilliger, M. G., & Jenkins, J. T. (2020). Teaching introductory programming from a to Z: Twenty-six tips from the trenches. Journal of Information Systems Education,31(2), 106–118.
Zhang, X., Zhang, C., Stafford, T. F., & Zhang, P. (2013). Teaching introductory programming to IS students: The impact of teaching approaches on learning performance. Journal of Information Systems Education,24(2), 147–155.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this research paper. They have no financial or personal relationships with any individuals or organizations that could potentially bias their work or affect the interpretation of the findings. This declaration includes any sources of funding or support received for the research, as well as any affiliations or competing interests that could be perceived as influencing the outcome of the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mills, R.J., Fyfe, E.R., Beaulieu, T. et al. Are you inspired or overwhelmed? The benefits of teachers setting challenging expectations. Instr Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09658-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09658-0