Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fostering transfer of responsibility in the middle school PBL classroom: an investigation of soft scaffolding

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scaffolding is one of the critical features in a problem-based learning environment to address challenges associated with problem solving. While transfer of responsibility is considered as an ultimate goal in scaffolding that is adaptive and contingent, it is rarely studied and practiced. Thus, the purpose of this study was to inform a deeper understanding of one middle school teacher’s manner of soft scaffolding, which refers to just-in-time and contingent support, through teacher-student interaction to examine how transfer of responsibility was achieved. We investigated one middle school teacher’s forms of scaffolding during a problem of food systems and supply chains related multiple aspects of sustainability and social justice issues. Using conversation analysis, three discursive patterns in scaffolding emerged: (1) shifting patterns of turn-taking organization; (2) leaving room for the students to take responsibility by giving extended wait time; and (3) extending the discussion with different examples. The paper concludes with implications for PBL teachers and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdu, R., Schwarz, B., & Mavrikis, M. (2015). Whole-class scaffolding for learning to solve mathematics problems together in a computer-supported environment. ZDM, 47(7), 1163–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education: Introduction and review. ZDM, 47(7), 1047–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. (2002). Is it truly possible to have such a thing as dPBL? Distance Education, 23(1), 119–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belland, B. R. (2011). Distributed cognition as a lens to understand the effects of scaffolds: The role of transfer of responsibility. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 577–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Armbrust, S., & Cook, B. (2015). Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: A mixed-method study in a rural middle school. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 325–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibok, M. B., Carpendale, J. I., & Müller, U. (2009). Parental scaffolding and the development of executive function. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2009(123), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T., Shin, S., Shin, S., Jung, J., Gensic, J., & Glazewski, K. D. (2016). Design and implementation of a technology-supported socioscientfic inquiry unit in high school biology. International Journal of Designs for Learning. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v7i2.20124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-C., Hand, B., & Norton-Meier, L. (2017). Teacher roles of questioning in early elementary science classrooms: A framework promoting student cognitive complexities in argumentation. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 373–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 8(1), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3–19). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dole, S., Bloom, L., & Doss, K. K. (2017). Engaged learning: Impact of PBL and PjBL with elementary and middle grade students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2019). Scaffolding in PBL environments: Structuring and problematizing relevant task features. The Wiley handbook of problem-based learning (pp. 321–342). Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Koehler, A. A. (2015). Facilitated versus non-facilitated online case discussions: Comparing differences in problem space coverage. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(2), 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazewski, K. D., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2019). Scaffolding and supporting use of information for ambitious learning practices. Information and Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-08-2018-0087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazewski, K. D., Shuster, M., Brush, T., & Ellis, A. (2014). Conexiones: Fostering socioscientific inquiry in graduate teacher preparation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. J. (1981). Conversational inference and classroom learning. Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 3–23). Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggarty, L. (1995). The use of content analysis to explore conversations between school teacher mentors and student teachers. British Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2010). Reproducing or constructing? Some questions about transcription in social research. Qualitative research, 10(5), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110375230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2005). Cognition in discourse. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 184–202). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo, C. E., & Lin, X. (2000). Becoming self-directed learners: Strategy development in problem-based learning. Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 227–250). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Creating a learning space in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Derry, S. J., Bitterman, A., & Hatrak, N. (2009). Targeting transfer in a STELLAR PBL course for preservice teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(2), 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoda, Y. (2016). Teacher deployment of ‘oh’in known-answer question sequences. Classroom Discourse, 7(1), 58–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C., & McWilliam, D. (2001). Peer argument in educational settings: Variations due to socioeconomic status, gender, and activity context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20(1–2), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W., Jonassen, D., & Liu, R. (2008). Problem-based learning. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3(1), 485–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J., & Elliott, V. (2014). Turn taking and ‘wait time’in classroom interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, J. (2012). Sounds of silence: Examining silence in problem-based learning (PBL) in Asia. Problem-based learning in clinical education (pp. 171–188). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, P. H. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: A qualitative case study. Instructional Science, 39(3), 255–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T., Glenn, P., & Conlee, M. (1997). Analyzing the emergence of a learning issue in a problem-based learning meeting. Medical Education Online, 2(1), 4290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou, C., & Issitt, J. (2008). What characterises effective teacher initiated teacher-pupil dialogue to promote conceptual understanding in mathematics lessons in england in key stages 2 and 3?: A systematic review: Report. EPPI-Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 541–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E., & Swank, P. R. (2009). New directions in evaluating social problem solving in childhood: Early precursors and links to adolescent social competence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2009(123), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J. (1993). A mindful education. Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. E., & Lewis, J. E. (2008). Seeking effectiveness and equity in a large college chemistry course: An HLM investigation of peer-led guided inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 794–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K., Bakker, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Scaffolding norms of argumentation-based inquiry in a primary mathematics classroom. ZDM, 47(7), 1107–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A. (1985). Two aspects of classroom interaction: Turn-taking and correction. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 13(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). ‘What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice, 18(4), 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1992). Talk for teaching and learning. Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (pp. 215–223). Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nariman, N., & Chrispeels, J. (2016). PBL in the era of reform standards: Challenges and benefits perceived by teachers in one elementary school. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, M. J., & Kim, S. (2009). Regulation of teacher elicitations in the mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 91–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 24(4), 318–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, T., Lester, J., & Dempster, P. (2014). Digital tools for qualitative research. London, England: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 29p. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2002). The transfer of problem-solving skills from a problem-based learning environment: The effect of modeling an expert’s cognitive processes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 35(2), 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88–110). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. (2009). In defense of food: The myth of nutrition and the pleasures of eating. Penguin.

  • Pomerantz, A. (1988). Offering a candidate answer: An information seeking strategy. Communications Monographs, 55(4), 360–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996). Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: Theoretical background. British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 605–624). London, England: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, J., Bosanquet, P., Webster, R., & Blatchford, P. (2015). Scaffolding learning for independence: Clarifying teacher and teaching assistant roles for children with special educational needs. Learning and Instruction, 36, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasku-Puttonen, H., Eteläpelto, A., Arvaja, M., & Häkkinen, P. (2003). Is successful scaffolding an illusion?–Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction during a long-term learning project. Instructional Science, 31(6), 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigosa, C., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2007). Scaffolded problem-solving in the physics and chemistry laboratory: Difficulties hindering students’ assumption of responsibility. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2015). Examining the role of the instructor in problem-centered instruction. TechTrends, 59(4), 96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. The handbook of education and human development (pp. 388–414). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Drummond, S., Torreblanca, O., Pedraza, H., Vélez, M., & Guzmán, K. (2013). ‘Dialogic scaffolding’: Enhancing learning and understanding in collaborative contexts. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Edited by G. Jefferson. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic interactional view. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows, 9, 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76–98). Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis I (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., Van der Molen, H. T., Te Winkel, W. W., & Wijnen, W. H. (2009). Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: A meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. B., & Shahar, N. (2017). Combining the dialogic and the dialectic: Putting argumentation into practice in classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seels, B. (1997). Taxonomic issues and the development of theory in instructional technology. Educational Technology, 37(1), 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S., & Song, H.-D. (2016). Finding the optimal scaffoldings for learners’ epistemological beliefs during ill-structured problem solving. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 2032–2047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, H. L., & Duch, B. J. (2001). Problem-based learning in large and very large classes. The power of problem-based learning: A practical ‘“how to”’for undergraduate courses in any discipline (pp. 149–163). Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, J., & van Eerde, D. (2013). What counts as evidence for the long-term realisation of whole-class scaffolding? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2(1), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, J., van Eerde, H. A., & Bakker, A. (2013). A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 817–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, T. (2015). Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in conversation analysis? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2012). Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective. Teaching and teacher education, 28(2), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, S., Slot, E., & Bakker, A. (2018). A primary teacher learning to use scaffolding strategies to support pupils’ scientific language development. European Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S., Banks, T., Sedas, M., Glazewski, K. D., Brush, T., & McKay, C. (2017). What will keep the fish alive? Exploring intersections of designing, making, and inquiry among middle school learners. International Journal of Designs for Learning. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v8i1.22668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (initiation-response-feedback): A single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. (2016). Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnen, M., Loyens, S. M., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M., & van der Molen, H. (2017). Comparing problem-based learning students to students in a lecture-based curriculum: Learning strategies and the relation with self-study time. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(3), 431–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., & Linn, M. C. (2002). WISE inquiry in fifth grade biology. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 415–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 276–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirkala, C., & Kuhn, D. (2011). Problem-based learning in K–12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects? American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1157–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based learning: Influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yew, E. H., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). What students learn in problem-based learning: A process analysis. Instructional Science, 40(2), 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997a). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997b). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haesol Bae.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Human Subjects & Institutional Review Boards at Indiana University. Informed consent and assent were obtained from all individual participants including the teacher and students who were included in the study, and they were informed they could elect to withdraw participation at any time.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bae, H., Glazewski, K., Brush, T. et al. Fostering transfer of responsibility in the middle school PBL classroom: an investigation of soft scaffolding. Instr Sci 49, 337–363 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09539-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09539-4

Keywords

Navigation