Laptop computers allow students to type lecture notes instead of relying on the traditional longhand (i.e. paper–pencil) method. The present research compared laptop and longhand note-taking methods by investigating how the quality (i.e. complete versus incomplete idea units) and quantity (i.e. total words and total idea units) of typed and handwritten notes differed when students did or did not reply to text messages during a simulated lecture. Accounting for the presence of text messaging while participants took notes situated the present study within the reality facing many students in today’s digital age. Findings indicated that a considerable proportion of the idea units captured in participants’ notes were incomplete, regardless of note-taking method or exposure to distraction during the simulated lecture. However, only the total number of complete idea units stored in student notes meaningfully predicted lecture learning. Furthermore, the presence of digital distraction was particularly disruptive to the quality and quantity of laptop users’ lecture notes relative to longhand note takers. Finally, digital distraction emerged as a more meaningful predictor of lecture learning than note-taking method. Recommendations for improving the quality of student lecture notes are discussed and avenues for future research into note-taking completeness and the interplay between digital distraction and note-taking method are proposed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175–199). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Blasiman, R. N., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2017). The what, how much, and when of study strategies: comparing intended versus actual study behavior. Memory, 25(6), 784–792.
Blohm, P. J., & Colwell, C. G. (1983, Dec.). Effects of readers’ cognitive style, text structure and signaling on different patterns in social studies content. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Austin, Texas, USA.
Bromage, B. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Quantitative and qualitative effects of repetition on learning from technical text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 271–278.
Brown, C. M. (1988). Comparison of typing and handwriting in “two finger typists”. Proceedings of Human Factors Society, 32, 381–385.
Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2012). Note-taking with computers: exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 299–309.
Carter, J. F., & Van Matre, N. H. (1975). Note taking versus note having. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(6), 900–904.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colliot, T., & Jamet, É. (2018a). Does self-generating a graphic organizer while reading improve students' learning? Computers & Education, 126, 13–22.
Colliot, T., & Jamet, É. (2018b). How does adding versus self-generating a hierarchical outline while learning from a multimedia document influence students' performances? Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 354–361.
Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, S. G. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032243.
Dietz, S., & Henrich, C. (2014). Texting as a distraction to learning in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 163–167.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Spontaneous spatial strategy use in learning from scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 66–79.
Flanigan, A. E., & Babchuk, W. A. (2015). Social media as academic quicksand: a phenomenological study of student experiences in and out of the classroom. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 40–45.
Flanigan, A. E., & Kiewra, K. A. (2018). What college instructors can do about student cyber-slacking. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 585–597.
Hartley, J., & Marshall, S. (1974). On notes and note-taking. Higher Education Quarterly, 28(2), 225–235.
Houle, P. A., Reed, D., Vaughan, A. G., & Clayton, S. R. (2013). Using laptop computers in class: a student motivation perspective. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 83–92.
Husman, J., McCann, E., & Crowson, H. M. (2000). Volitional strategies and future time perspective: embracing the complexity of dynamic interactions. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(7–8), 777–799.
Jorgensen, M., Havel, A., Fichten, C., King, L., Marcil, E., Lussier, A., et al. (2018). “Simply the best”: Professors nominated by students for their exemplary technology practices in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 193–210.
Kay, R., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Exploring the benefits and challenges of using laptop computers in higher education classrooms: a formative analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1), 83–92.
Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: a researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). London: Pearson.
Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: a depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23–32.
Kiewra, K. A. (2002). How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 71–80.
Kiewra, K. A. (2009). Teaching how to learn: the teacher’s guide to student success. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., Kim, S. I., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(2), 172–187.
Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.168.
Knight, L. J., & McKelvie, S. J. (1986). Effects of attendance, note-taking, and review on memory for a lecture: Encoding vs. external storage functions of notes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 18(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079957.
Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.001.
Kornhauser, Z. G. C., Paul, A. L., & Siedlecki, K. L. (2016). An examination of students’ use of technology for non-academic purposes in the college classroom. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 5(1), 1–15.
Kover, D. J., & Worrell, F. C. (2010). The influence of instrumentality beliefs on intrinsic motivation: a study of high-achieving adolescents. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(3), 470–498.
Kuznekoff, J. H., Munz, S., & Titsworth, S. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: examining the effects of texting, twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education, 64(3), 344–365.
Kuznekoff, J. H., & Titsworth, S. (2013). The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Communication Education, 62(3), 233–252.
Luo, L., Kiewra, K. A., Flanigan, A. E., & Peteranetz, M. S. (2018). Laptop versus longhand note taking: effects on lecture notes and achievement. Instructional Science, 46(6), 947–971.
Luo, L., Kiewra, K. A., & Samuelson, L. (2016). Revising lecture notes: how revision, pauses, and partners affect note taking and achievement. Instructional Science, 44(1), 45–67.
Malka, A., & Covington, M. V. (2005). Perceiving school performance as instrumental to future goal attainment: effects on graded performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 60–80.
McCoy, B. R. (2013). Digital distractions in the classroom: student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 4(4), 5–14.
McCoy, B. R. (2016). Digital distractions in the classroom phase II: student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. Journal of Media Education, 7(1), 5–32.
McDougall, R. (1904). Recognition and recall. Journal of Philosophical and Scientific Methods, 1, 229–233.
Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(1), 40–48.
Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2019a). How much mightier is the pen than the keyboard for note-taking? A replication and extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014). Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 753–780.
Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Blasiman, R., & Hollis, R. B. (2019b). Note-taking habits of 21st century college students: implications forstudent learning, memory, and achievement. Memory, 27(6), 807–819.
Mosleh, M. A., Baba, M. S., Malek, S., & Alhussein, M. A. (2016). Challenges of digital note taking. In H. Sulaiman, M. Othman, M. Othman, Y. Rahim, & N. Pee (Eds.), Advanced computer and communication engineering technology (pp. 211–231). Cham: Springer.
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168.
Palmatier, R. A., & Bennett, J. M. (1974). Notetaking habits of college students. Journal of Reading, 18(3), 215–218.
Parry, D. A., & le Roux, D. B. (2018). In-lecture media use and academic performance: investigating demographic and intentional moderators. South African Computer Journal, 30(1), 85–107.
Peters, D. L. (1972). Effects of notetaking and rate of presentation on short-term objective test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 276–280.
Pettijohn, T. F., Frazier, E., Rieser, E., Vaughn, N., & Hupp-Wildsde, B. (2015). Classroom texting in college students. College Student Journal, 49(4), 513–516.
Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., & Garner, J. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 167–180.
Ragan, E. D., Jennings, S. R., Massey, J. D., & Doolittle, P. E. (2014). Unregulated use of laptops over time in large lecture halls. Computers & Education, 78, 78–86.
Ravizza, S. M., Uitvlugt, M. G., & Fenn, K. M. (2017). Logged in and zoned out: how laptop internet use relates to classroom learning. Psychological science, 28(2), 171–180.
Reddington, L. A., Peverly, S. T., & Block, C. J. (2015). An examination of some of the cognitive and motivation variables related to gender differences in lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing, 28(8), 1155–1185.
Reimer, Y. J., Brimhall, E., Cao, C., & O’Reilly, K. (2009). Empirical user studies inform the design of an e-notetaking and information assimilation system for students in higher education. Computers & Education, 52(4), 893–913.
Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3(2), 136–143.
Robinson, D. H., & Kiewra, K. A. (1995). Visual argument: graphic organizers are superior to outlines in improving learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 455–467.
Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31.
Simonds, B. K., Meyer, K. R., Quinlan, M. M., & Hunt, S. K. (2006). Effects of instructor speech rate on student affective learning, recall, and perceptions of nonverbal immediacy, credibility, and clarity. Communication Research Reports, 23(3), 187–197.
Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 323–338.
Waite, B. M., Lindberg, R., Ernst, B., Bowman, L. L., & Levine, L. E. (2018). Off-task multitasking, note-taking, and lower- and higher-order classroom learning. Computers & Education, 120, 98–111.
Wildt, A. R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1978). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: analysis of covariance. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Williams, R. L., & Eggert, A. C. (2002). Notetaking in college classes: student patterns and instructional strategies. The Journal of General Education, 51(3), 173–199.
Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2019). The current status of students’ note-taking: why and how do students take notes? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(2), 139–153.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2), 87–95.
Wood, E., Mirza, A., & Shaw, L. (2018). Using technology to promote classroom instruction: assessing incidences of on-task and off-task multitasking and learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 553–571.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Flanigan, A.E., Titsworth, S. The impact of digital distraction on lecture note taking and student learning. Instr Sci 48, 495–524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09517-2