Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Situational interest helps correct misconceptions: An investigation of conceptual change in university students

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many learners possess misconceptions regarding instructional content; toward this aim, educational practitioners employ teaching practices that support learners’ efforts to restructure their existing knowledge structures—a process known as conceptual change. The Cognitive Reconstruction of Knowledge Model emphasizes the importance of conceptual dissatisfaction, topic interest, and learners’ need for cognition in the process of conceptual change. However, most conceptual change studies have failed to differentiate the contribution of dispositional and situational interest to the revision of conceptual understanding. The current study was designed to test key predictions of the Cognitive Reconstruction of Knowledge Model while also exploring the influence of dispositional and situational interest on the conceptual change process. Participants (N = 360) recruited from two universities in the United States completed measures assessing pre- and post-test knowledge, individual and situational interest, need for cognition, dissatisfaction, and cognitive engagement. Further, participants read a refutational text designed to address commonly endorsed misconceptions regarding HIV/AIDS. Results of a path analysis indicated situational interest exerted a significant indirect effect on conceptual change scores through cognitive engagement. Contrary to the predictions of the Cognitive Reconstruction of Knowledge Model, our findings indicated that the need for cognition, individual interest, and cognitive conflict were not significant predictors of conceptual change. We believe the findings of our investigation highlight the importance of fostering situational interest when attempting to promote knowledge reconstruction among learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology,94(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A. (2004). A model of domain learning: Reinterpreting expertise as a multidimensional, multistage process. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg, (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 273–298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence: Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (1993). Determining the persuasiveness of message sidedness: A prudent note about utilizing research summaries. Western Journal of Communication,57, 98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. H., & Ambruster, B. B. (1984). Studying. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 657–679). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andre, T., & Windschitl, M. (2003). Interest, epistemological belief, and intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 173–193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,107(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braasch, J. L., Goldman, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2013). The influences of text and reader characteristics on learning from refutations in science texts. Journal of Educational Psychology,105(3), 561–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,42, 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment,48(3), 306–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravita, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction,4(1), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T., & Brem, S. K. (2009). Contrasting Ohlsson's resubsumption theory with Chi's categorical shift theory. Educational Psychologist,44(1), 58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it, and learning outcomes. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on CC (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research,63(1), 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordova, J. R., Sinatra, G. M., Jones, S. H., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Confidence in prior knowledge, self-efficacy, interest and prior knowledge: Influences on conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology,39, 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. A. (2013). A bird’s - eye view of the “pieces” vs. “coherence” controversy (from the “pieces” side of the fence). In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on CC (pp. 31–48). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist,33, 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly,28(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.2307/747886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldén, O., Scheja, M., & Hagelund, L. (2013). The contextuality of knowledge: An intentional approach to meaning making and conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on CC (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G., & Iganaki, K. (2003). When is conceptual change intended? A cognitive-sociocultural view. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 407–427). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher’s perspective: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 309–339). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review,1, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 215–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist,41(2), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. L., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Use of task-value instructional inductions for facilitating engagement and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology,38(1), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. L., & Sinatra, G. M. (2014). The influence of approach and avoidance goals on conceptual change. The Journal of Educational Research,107, 31–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. H., Johnson, M. L., & Campbell, B. D. (2015). Hot factors for a cold topic: Examining the role of task-value, attention allocation, and engagement on conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology,42, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H., Scharmann, L. C., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change. International Journal of Environmental Science in Education,5(4), 383–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendeou, P., Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2015). Optimizing Conditions for Learning: Situating refutations in epistemic cognition. The Journal of Experimental Education,84(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1027806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2000). Interest and human development during adolescence: An educational-psychological approach. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 109–128). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, S. S., Kim, J., Kwon, H., & Park, H. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40, 585–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 357–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., et al. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement,70, 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Pugh, K. J., Koskey, K. L. K., & Stewart, V. C. (2012). Developing conceptual understanding of natural selection: The role of interest, efficacy, and basic prior knowledge. The Journal of Experimental Education,80(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinie, M.-A., Olive, T., & Milland, L. (2010). Cognitive dissonance induced by writing a counterattitudinal essay facilitates performance on simple tasks but not on complex tasks that involve working memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,46(4), 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Baldi, R., Di Ronco, S., Scrimin, S., Danielson, R. W., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017). Textual and graphical refutations: Effects on conceptual change learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology,49, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology,100(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review,8(4), 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 85–139). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrudden, M. T., & Kendeou, P. (2014). Exploring the link between cognitive processes and learning from refutational text. Journal of Research in Reading,37(S1), S116–S140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01527.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2013). Situating text, talk, and transfer in conceptual change: Concluding thoughts. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change, tr (pp. 603–621). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. K., Holleran, T. A., Long, J. F., & Zeruth, J. A. (2005). Examining the complex roles of motivation and text medium in the persuasion process. Contemporary Educational Psychology,30, 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neressian, N. J. (2013). Mental modeling in conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on CC (pp. 395–411). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,3(4), 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titx, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulation learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist,37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. B. (1993a). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research,63, 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993b). Predictive validity and reliability of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement,53, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education,66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potvin, P., Sauriol, E., & Riopel, M. (2015). Experimental evidence of the superiority of the prevalence model of conceptual change over the classical models and repetition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,52, 1082–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsburg, J. T., & Ohlsson, S. (2016). Category change in the absence of cognitive conflict. Journal of Educational Psychology,108(1), 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: implications for theory and practice. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 361–393). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373–404). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods,17(3), 354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotgans, J. I. (2015). Validation study of a general subject-matter interest measure: The Individual Interest Questionnaire (IIQ). Health Professions Education, 1(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2015.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology,49, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist,26, 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review,13(3), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Svetina, M. (2002). A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: Comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development, 73(3), 793–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Svetina, M. (2013). Relations between short-term and long-term conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on CC (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The “warming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist,40, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Mason, L. (2013). Learner characteristics influencing conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 377–394). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences,3, 115–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research,25(2), 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taasoobshirazi, G., Heddy, B., Bailey, M., & Farley, J. (2016). A multivariate model of conceptual change. Instructional Science,44, 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1251-016-9372-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taasoobshirazi, G., & Sinatra, G. M. (2011). A structural equation model of conceptual change in physics. Journal of Research in Teaching,48(8), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevors, G., & Muis, K. R. (2015). Effects of text structure, reading goals and epistemic beliefs on conceptual change. Journal of Research in Reading,38(4), 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika,38(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational psychologist,38(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (2013a). Conceptual change in learning and instruction: The framework theory approach. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on CC (pp. 11–30). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (2013b). Conceptual change research: An introduction. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on CC (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24(4), 535–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education,20(10), 1213–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S., Vamvakoussi, X., & Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., & Reichers, A. E. (1996). Estimating the reliability of a single-item measure. Psychological Reports,78(2), 631–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of applied Psychology,82(2), 247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittrock, M. C. (2010). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist,45(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of Texas At Tyler, 3900 University Blvd, Tyler, TX, 75799, USA

    Christopher L. Thomas

  2. Department of Psychology and Counseling, University of Texas At Tyler, 3900 University Blvd, Tyler, TX, 75799, USA

    Lauren A. J. Kirby

Authors
  1. Christopher L. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lauren A. J. Kirby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher L. Thomas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, C.L., Kirby, L.A.J. Situational interest helps correct misconceptions: An investigation of conceptual change in university students. Instr Sci 48, 223–241 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09509-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09509-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation