There has been a shift in college classrooms from students recording lecture notes using a longhand pencil-paper medium to using laptops. The present study investigated whether note-taking medium (laptop, longhand) influenced note taking and achievement when notes were recorded but not reviewed (note taking’s process function) and when notes were recorded and reviewed (note taking’s product function). One unique aspect of the study was determining how laptop and longhand note taking influence the recording of lecture images in notes and image-related achievement. Note-taking results showed that laptop note takers recorded more notes (idea units and words) and more verbatim lecture strings than did longhand note takers who, in turn, recorded more visual notes (signals and images) than did laptop note takers. Achievement results showed that when taking laptop notes, the process function of note taking was more beneficial than the product function of note taking (i.e., better image-related learning and similar text-related learning). When taking longhand notes, the product function of note taking was more beneficial than the process function of note taking (i.e., better text-related learning and similar image-related learning). Achievement findings suggest that the optimal note-taking medium depends on the nature of the lecture and whether notes are reviewed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Kiewra et al. (1991) argued that the product function of note taking is best represented by those who only review notes (such as those provided by the instructor or borrowed from a fellow student) but do not also record notes. They argued that both recording and reviewing notes is representative of the combined process and product functions of note taking rather than the product function alone.
Aguilar-Roca, N. M., Williams, A. E., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2012). The impact of laptop-free zones on student performance and attitudes in large lectures. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1300–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.002.
Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076613.
Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Badger, R., White, G., Sutherland, P., & Haggis, T. (2001). Note perfect: an investigation of how students view taking notes in lectures. System, 29(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00028-8.
Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 245–263.
Bligh, D. A. (2000). What’s the use of lectures?. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bohay, M., Blakely, D. P., Tamplin, A. K., & Radvansky, G. A. (2011). Note taking, review, memory, and comprehension. American Journal of Psychology, 124, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0063.
Bonner, J. M., & Holliday, W. G. (2006). How college science students engage in note-taking strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 786–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20115.
Boyle, J. R., & Forchelli, G. A. (2014). Differences in the note-taking skills of students with high achievement, average achievement, and learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.002.
Brown, C. M. (1998). Human-computer interface design guidelines. Exeter: Intellect Books.
Bui, D. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015). Enhancing learning during lecture note-taking using outlines and illustrative diagrams. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.03.002.
Bui, D. C., & Myerson, J. (2014). The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.002.
Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2013). Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030367.
Castelló, M., & Monereo, C. (2005). Students’ note-taking as a knowledge-construction tool. L1-Educational. Studies in Language and Literature, 5(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10674-005-8557-4.
ChanLin, L.-J. (1998). Animation to teach students of different knowledge levels. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25(3), 166–175.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
Conway, M. A., & Gathercole, S. E. (1990). Writing and long-term memory: Evidence for a “translation” hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42(3), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401235.
Corbridge, S. J., Robinson, F. P., Tiffen, J., & Corbridge, T. C. (2010). Online learning versus simulation for teaching principles of mechanical ventilation to nurse practitioner students. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1976.
Cramer, K. M., Collins, K. R., Snider, D., & Fawcett, G. (2006). Virtual lecture hall for in-class and online sections. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782465.
De Haan, E. H. F., Appels, B., Aleman, A., & Postma, A. (2000). Inter- and intramodal encoding of auditory and visual presentation of material: Effects on memory performance. The Psychological Record, 50, 577–586.
Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, S. G. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032243.
Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 522–532.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Spontaneous spatial strategy use in learning from scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 66–79.
Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035640.
Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006.
Friedman, M. C., Moulton, S., & Gehlbach, H. (2014). The impact of longhand and laptop note-taking on classroom performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society.
Gagné, R. M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Inc.
Glover, J. A., Zimmer, J. W., Ronning, R. R., & Petersen, C. H. (1980). Nobody knows how to remember that prose. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(6), 340–343.
Gronlund, N. E. (1998). Assessment of student achievement. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon Publishing.
Karat, C. M., Halverson, C., Horn, D., & Karat, J. (1999). Patterns of entry and correction in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 568–575). New York: ACM.
Katayama, A. D., & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting students “partially” involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598498.
Keefe, T. J. (2003). Using technology to enhance a course: The importance of interaction. Educause Quarterly, 1, 24–34.
Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23–32.
Kiewra, K. A. (2002). How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_3.
Kiewra, K. A. (2009). Teaching how to learn: The teacher’s guide to student success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.52.
Kiewra, K. A., & Fletcher, H. J. (1984). The relationship between levels of note-taking and achievement. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 3(4), 273–280.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163.
Knight, L. J., & McKelvie, S. J. (1986). Effects of attendance, note-taking, and review on memory for a lecture: Encoding vs. external storage functions of notes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 18(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079957.
Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.001.
Lauricella, S., & Kay, R. (2010). Assessing laptop use in higher education classrooms: The laptop effectiveness scale (LES). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 151–163.
Lorch, R. F. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320135.
Luo, L., Kiewra, K. A., & Samuelson, L. (2016). Revising lecture notes: How revision, pauses, and partners affect note taking and achievement. Instructional Science, 44(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9370-4.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63, 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726.
Mitra, A., & Steffensmeier, T. (2000). Changes in student attitudes and student computer use in a computer-enriched environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 417–433.
Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Science Education, 9, 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063.
Mosleh, M. A., Baba, M. S., Malek, S., & Alhussein, M. A. (2016). Challenges of digital note taking. In H. Sulaiman, M. Othman, M. Othman, Y. Rahim, & N. Pee (Eds.), Advanced computer and communication engineering technology (pp. 211–231). Cham: Springer.
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581.
Nye, P. A., Crooks, T. J., Powley, M., & Tripp, G. (1984). Student note-taking related to university examination performance. Higher Education, 13(1), 85–97.
Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 514–522.
Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.206.
Peverly, S. T., Brobst, K. E., Graham, M., & Shaw, R. (2003). College adults are not good at self-regulation: A study on the relationship of self-regulation, note taking, and test taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.115.
Peverly, S. T., Garner, J. K., & Vekaria, P. C. (2014). Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9431-x.
Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., & Garner, J. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.168.
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086.
Reimer, Y. J., Brimhall, E., Cao, C., & O’Reilly, K. (2009). Empirical user studies inform the design of an e-notetaking and information assimilation system for students in higher education. Computers & Education, 52(4), 893–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.013.
Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3(2), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(78)90020-6.
Riley, J. D., & Dyer, J. (1979). The effects of notetaking while reading or listening. Reading World, 19(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388077909557514.
Scerbo, M. W., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Grasha, A. F. (1992). The role of time and cuing in a college lecture. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(4), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(92)90070-F.
Shrager, L., & Mayer, R. E. (1989). Note-taking fosters generative learning strategies in novices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 263–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0622.214.171.1243.
Skolnik, R., & Puzo, M. (2008). Utilization of laptop computers in the school of business classroom. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 12, 1–10.
Stefanou, C., Hoffman, L., & Vielee, N. (2008). Note-taking in the college classroom as evidence of generative learning. Learning Environments Research, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9033-0.
Suritsky, S. K., & Hughes, C. A. (1991). Benefits of notetaking: Implications for secondary and postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510370.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.
Van Etten, S., Freebern, G., & Pressley, M. (1997). College students’ beliefs about exam preparation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(2), 192–212.
Williams, R. L., & Worth, S. L. (2002). Thinking skills and work habits: Contributors to course performance. The Journal of General Education, 51(3), 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2003.0007.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527409529129.
Young, J. R. (2009). When computers leave classrooms, so does boredom. The Education Digest, 75, 48–51.
We thank Dr. Pam Mueller and Dr. Daniel Oppenheimer for supplying the program for the verbatim strings analyses, and we thank Daniel Parr for scoring notes.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, L., Kiewra, K.A., Flanigan, A.E. et al. Laptop versus longhand note taking: effects on lecture notes and achievement. Instr Sci 46, 947–971 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9458-0
- Note taking
- Lecture learning