Advertisement

Instructional Science

, Volume 46, Issue 6, pp 947–971 | Cite as

Laptop versus longhand note taking: effects on lecture notes and achievement

  • Linlin Luo
  • Kenneth A. KiewraEmail author
  • Abraham E. Flanigan
  • Markeya S. Peteranetz
Original Research

Abstract

There has been a shift in college classrooms from students recording lecture notes using a longhand pencil-paper medium to using laptops. The present study investigated whether note-taking medium (laptop, longhand) influenced note taking and achievement when notes were recorded but not reviewed (note taking’s process function) and when notes were recorded and reviewed (note taking’s product function). One unique aspect of the study was determining how laptop and longhand note taking influence the recording of lecture images in notes and image-related achievement. Note-taking results showed that laptop note takers recorded more notes (idea units and words) and more verbatim lecture strings than did longhand note takers who, in turn, recorded more visual notes (signals and images) than did laptop note takers. Achievement results showed that when taking laptop notes, the process function of note taking was more beneficial than the product function of note taking (i.e., better image-related learning and similar text-related learning). When taking longhand notes, the product function of note taking was more beneficial than the process function of note taking (i.e., better text-related learning and similar image-related learning). Achievement findings suggest that the optimal note-taking medium depends on the nature of the lecture and whether notes are reviewed.

Keywords

Note taking Lecture learning Laptop 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Pam Mueller and Dr. Daniel Oppenheimer for supplying the program for the verbatim strings analyses, and we thank Daniel Parr for scoring notes.

References

  1. Aguilar-Roca, N. M., Williams, A. E., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2012). The impact of laptop-free zones on student performance and attitudes in large lectures. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1300–1308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 439–444.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Badger, R., White, G., Sutherland, P., & Haggis, T. (2001). Note perfect: an investigation of how students view taking notes in lectures. System, 29(3), 405–417.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00028-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bligh, D. A. (2000). What’s the use of lectures?. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Bohay, M., Blakely, D. P., Tamplin, A. K., & Radvansky, G. A. (2011). Note taking, review, memory, and comprehension. American Journal of Psychology, 124, 63–73.  https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.124.1.0063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonner, J. M., & Holliday, W. G. (2006). How college science students engage in note-taking strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 786–818.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyle, J. R., & Forchelli, G. A. (2014). Differences in the note-taking skills of students with high achievement, average achievement, and learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 9–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, C. M. (1998). Human-computer interface design guidelines. Exeter: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  11. Bui, D. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2015). Enhancing learning during lecture note-taking using outlines and illustrative diagrams. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 129–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bui, D. C., & Myerson, J. (2014). The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 12–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2013). Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 299–309.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castelló, M., & Monereo, C. (2005). Students’ note-taking as a knowledge-construction tool. L1-Educational. Studies in Language and Literature, 5(3), 265–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10674-005-8557-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ChanLin, L.-J. (1998). Animation to teach students of different knowledge levels. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25(3), 166–175.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conway, M. A., & Gathercole, S. E. (1990). Writing and long-term memory: Evidence for a “translation” hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42(3), 513–527.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Corbridge, S. J., Robinson, F. P., Tiffen, J., & Corbridge, T. C. (2010). Online learning versus simulation for teaching principles of mechanical ventilation to nurse practitioner students. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship.  https://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cramer, K. M., Collins, K. R., Snider, D., & Fawcett, G. (2006). Virtual lecture hall for in-class and online sections. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 371–381.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Haan, E. H. F., Appels, B., Aleman, A., & Postma, A. (2000). Inter- and intramodal encoding of auditory and visual presentation of material: Effects on memory performance. The Psychological Record, 50, 577–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, S. G. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 522–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Spontaneous spatial strategy use in learning from scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 321–325.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906–914.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedman, M. C., Moulton, S., & Gehlbach, H. (2014). The impact of longhand and laptop note-taking on classroom performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society.Google Scholar
  29. Gagné, R. M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Glover, J. A., Zimmer, J. W., Ronning, R. R., & Petersen, C. H. (1980). Nobody knows how to remember that prose. The Journal of Educational Research, 73(6), 340–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gronlund, N. E. (1998). Assessment of student achievement. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Karat, C. M., Halverson, C., Horn, D., & Karat, J. (1999). Patterns of entry and correction in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 568–575). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  33. Katayama, A. D., & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting students “partially” involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 119–133.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009598498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keefe, T. J. (2003). Using technology to enhance a course: The importance of interaction. Educause Quarterly, 1, 24–34.Google Scholar
  35. Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kiewra, K. A. (2002). How classroom teachers can help students learn and teach them how to learn. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 71–80.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kiewra, K. A. (2009). Teaching how to learn: The teacher’s guide to student success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240–245.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kiewra, K. A., & Fletcher, H. J. (1984). The relationship between levels of note-taking and achievement. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 3(4), 273–280.Google Scholar
  40. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knight, L. J., & McKelvie, S. J. (1986). Effects of attendance, note-taking, and review on memory for a lecture: Encoding vs. external storage functions of notes. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 18(1), 52–61.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 242–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lauricella, S., & Kay, R. (2010). Assessing laptop use in higher education classrooms: The laptop effectiveness scale (LES). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lorch, R. F. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 209–234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luo, L., Kiewra, K. A., & Samuelson, L. (2016). Revising lecture notes: How revision, pauses, and partners affect note taking and achievement. Instructional Science, 44(1), 45–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9370-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63, 760–769.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mitra, A., & Steffensmeier, T. (2000). Changes in student attitudes and student computer use in a computer-enriched environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Science Education, 9, 473–481.  https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mosleh, M. A., Baba, M. S., Malek, S., & Alhussein, M. A. (2016). Challenges of digital note taking. In H. Sulaiman, M. Othman, M. Othman, Y. Rahim, & N. Pee (Eds.), Advanced computer and communication engineering technology (pp. 211–231). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nye, P. A., Crooks, T. J., Powley, M., & Tripp, G. (1984). Student note-taking related to university examination performance. Higher Education, 13(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 514–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 34–38.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peverly, S. T., Brobst, K. E., Graham, M., & Shaw, R. (2003). College adults are not good at self-regulation: A study on the relationship of self-regulation, note taking, and test taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 335–346.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peverly, S. T., Garner, J. K., & Vekaria, P. C. (2014). Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing, 27(1), 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9431-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peverly, S. T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., Alidoost, M., & Garner, J. (2007). What predicts skill in lecture note taking? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 167–180.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reimer, Y. J., Brimhall, E., Cao, C., & O’Reilly, K. (2009). Empirical user studies inform the design of an e-notetaking and information assimilation system for students in higher education. Computers & Education, 52(4), 893–913.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rickards, J. P., & Friedman, F. (1978). The encoding versus the external storage hypothesis in note taking. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3(2), 136–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(78)90020-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Riley, J. D., & Dyer, J. (1979). The effects of notetaking while reading or listening. Reading World, 19(1), 51–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19388077909557514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scerbo, M. W., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Grasha, A. F. (1992). The role of time and cuing in a college lecture. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(4), 312–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(92)90070-F.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shrager, L., & Mayer, R. E. (1989). Note-taking fosters generative learning strategies in novices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 263–264.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Skolnik, R., & Puzo, M. (2008). Utilization of laptop computers in the school of business classroom. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 12, 1–10.Google Scholar
  66. Stefanou, C., Hoffman, L., & Vielee, N. (2008). Note-taking in the college classroom as evidence of generative learning. Learning Environments Research, 11(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9033-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Suritsky, S. K., & Hughes, C. A. (1991). Benefits of notetaking: Implications for secondary and postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(1), 7–18.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1510370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Etten, S., Freebern, G., & Pressley, M. (1997). College students’ beliefs about exam preparation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(2), 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Williams, R. L., & Worth, S. L. (2002). Thinking skills and work habits: Contributors to course performance. The Journal of General Education, 51(3), 200–227.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2003.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11(2), 87–95.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461527409529129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Young, J. R. (2009). When computers leave classrooms, so does boredom. The Education Digest, 75, 48–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linlin Luo
    • 1
  • Kenneth A. Kiewra
    • 2
    Email author
  • Abraham E. Flanigan
    • 3
  • Markeya S. Peteranetz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of School Research, School Development, and EvaluationUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  3. 3.School of Communication StudiesOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations