Today we think of the desired outcomes of mathematics learning as comprising not only students’ mastery of facts and procedures but their emerging from instruction with certain dispositions, their persevering at problem solving, their being inclined to pursue mathematical connections, their being able to produce extended chains of reasoning and communicate them orally and in writing, and their seeing themselves as members of the mathematical community. With these as goals, one’s conception of powerful mathematical instruction changes. And, once one has the understanding that not only students’ content mastery but their beliefs, dispositions, and practices are all shaped by instruction, one’s analytic lenses change as well. The same holds for reading and writing, for social studies, and for every other discipline.
(Schoenfeld, 2016, p. 110)
Abstract
In reviewing the six articles within this Instructional Science special issue, we are reminded of Schoenfeld’s (Educ Res 45(2):105–111, 2016) review of American Educational Research Association president-authored papers for the centennial celebration of AERA. There, he succinctly unveiled the content focus of AERA research in the first half of the twentieth century: “there is content to be mastered; it is the schools’ job to help students master it” (p. 106). Yet, like Schoenfeld says, “A century later, we hear the echoes of this functionality in the calls for ‘21st-century skills,’” (p. 106), and the “skills” of the twentieth and twenty-first century would hardly know each other. Twentieth century skills, as represented in the accounts from past AERA presidents, were product-oriented, like accurate copying and precise handwriting. Twenty-first century skills are focused on creativity, ingenuity, critical thinking, and the like. In our primary research space, mathematics education, problem solving, sense making, and conceptual understanding dominates in the twenty-first century, whereas procedures dominated teaching and learning mathematics in the twentieth century.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Perhaps we are too forward looking, but in contrast to the authors’ statement that “One of the important capabilities we need to develop among present and future citizens is driving in congestion safely and cost-effectively,” we on the other hand were thinking—keep doing this research before self-driving cards eliminate the context!
References
Battista, M. T. (2008). Development of the Shape Makers geometry microworld: Design principles and research. In G. Blume & K. Heid (Eds.), Research on technology in the learning and teaching of mathematics: Cases and perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 131–156). Charlotte, NC: NCTM/Information Age Publishing.
Becker, J. P., & Jacob, B. (2000). The politics of California school mathematics: The anti-reform of the 1997–1999. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 529–537.
Clements, D. H. (1997). (Mis?)Constructing constructivism. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(4), 198–200.
Clements, D. H., Fuson, K. C., & Sarama, J. (2017). The research-based balance in early childhood mathematics: A response to Common Core criticisms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 40, 150–162.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Hypothetical learning trajectories. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007/2013). Building blocks (Vols. 1, 2). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014a). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014b, March 3, 2014). Play, mathematics, and false dichotomies. Preschool matters…today! New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER) at Rutgers University. Retrieved from http://preschoolmatters.org/2014/03/03/play-mathematics-and-false-dichotomies/.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Kapur, M. (2017). Preparatory effects of problem posing on learning from instruction. In D. Abrahamson & M. Kapur (Eds.), Practicing discovery-based learning: Evaluating new horizons [Special issue]. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9435-z, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9444-y.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Klahr, D. (2010). Coming up for air: But is it oxygen or phlogiston? A response to Taber’s review of constructivist instruction: Success or failure? Education Review, 13(13), 1–6.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York: Routledge.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2004). Math wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803260042.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). 100 Years of curriculum history, theory, and research. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639025.
Simon, M. A., Placa, N., & Avitzur, A. (2016). Participatory and anticipatory stages of mathematical concept learning: Further empirical and theoretical development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(1), 63–93.
Vergnaud, G. (1978). The acquisition of arithmetical concepts. In E. Cohors-Fresenborg & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 344–355). Osnabruck, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clements, D.H., Joswick, C. Broadening the horizons of research on discovery-based learning. Instr Sci 46, 155–167 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9449-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9449-1