Challenges of peer instruction in an undergraduate student-led learning community: bi-directional diffusion as a crucial instructional process
Learning communities (LCs) can provide authentic, social learning experiences but require an extensive amount of time and effort to orchestrate, often more than instructors can provide in typical university courses. Extracurricular, undergraduate, student-led learning communities (SLLCs) overcome this cost through volunteer peer-instructors. Unfortunately, LCs theory is based exclusively on teacher-led LCs. Here we ask what instructional processes emerge in SLLCs? We conducted a qualitative case study of SLLC student leaders’ attempts to teach a project management practice (StandUp) to student innovation teams. We found that instruction in SLLCs takes the form of a bi-directional diffusion process, in which peer-instructors influence students’ decisions about what practices to participate in, and students influence peer-instructors’ decisions about advocating for practices. Three major findings support the bi-directional diffusion model. First, students’ participation in StandUp hinged on whether they saw the practice as valuable with respect to their social, learning, and/or performance goals. Second, peer-instructors struggled to persuade and scaffold students to participate in StandUp. Third, students influenced peer-instructors to stop advocating for StandUp. The bi-directional diffusion model highlights the practical importance of persuading students to participate in the community’s practices. The model suggests that we might support peer-instruction by promoting peer-instructors’ content knowledge about practices, their persuasion skills, and their motivation to advocate for practices.
KeywordsLearning communities Peer instruction Diffusion Extracurricular learning environments Authentic learning environments Peer learning
We thank Natalia Smirnov, Emily Harburg, Serene Yu, David Rapp, Penelope Peterson, Tracy Dobie, Bruce Sherin, Christina Krist, Julie Hui, Leesha Maliakal, Pryce Davis, and Delta Lab for their feedback on this paper. We thank Sameer Srivastava for providing access. This work is supported by US National Science Foundation Grants No. IIS-1320693 and No. IIS-1217225, and the Undergraduate Research Grant Program at Northwestern University. An earlier version of this study was presented at the 17th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction 2017.
- Ben-Zvi, D., Bielaczyc, K., & Hod, Y. (2015). Call for papers: Special issue on “revisiting learning communities: innovations in theory and practice.” Retrieved from http://lc.edtech.haifa.ac.il/special-issue/call-for-papers.
- Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. Instructional-design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 269–292.Google Scholar
- Bielaczyc, K., Kapur, M., & Collins, A. (2013). Cultivating a community of learners in K-12 classrooms. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, A. M. O’Donnell, C. Chan, & C. A. Chinn (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 233–249). New York: Taylor & Francis, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837290.ch13.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. The Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dale, A. T., Hess, J. L., Best, R. E., & Lennox, E. R. (2015). Beyond professional development: The value proposition of multi-disciplinary networks for creating global engineers. Paper Presented in the QScience Proceedings of Engineering Leaders Conference 2015. https://doi.org/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.11.Google Scholar
- DeBarger, A. H., Choppin, J., Beauvineau, Y., & Moorthy, S. (2013). Designing for productive adaptations of curriculum interventions. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 112(2), 298–319.Google Scholar
- Dunning, D. (2012). Self-insight: Roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Easterday, M. W., Rees Lewis, D. G., & Gerber, E. M. (2016). The logic of the theoretical and practical products of design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2464.
- Easterday, M. W., Rees Lewis, D. G., & Gerber, E. M. (2017). The logic of design research. Learning: Research and Practice, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1286367.
- Easterday, M.W., Gerber, E.M., & Rees Lewis, D.G. (2018). Social innovation networks: A new approach to social design education and impact. Design Issues, 34(2).Google Scholar
- Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoadley, C. (2012). What is a community of practice and how can we support it? In D. H. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 287–300). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., et al. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jordan, M. E., & McDaniel, R. R. (2014). Managing uncertainty during collaborative problem solving in elementary school teams: The role of peer influence in robotics engineering activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 490–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.896254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kafai, Y. B., Burke, W. Q., & Fields, D. A. (2009). What videogame making can teach us about access and ethics in participatory culture. Paper in the proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association (DIGRA) 2009. London, UK.Google Scholar
- Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., & Kowitz, B. (2016). Sprint: How to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. London: SAGE Publications, Incorporated.Google Scholar
- Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rees Lewis, D. G., Easterday, M. W., Harburg, E., Gerber, E. M., & Riesbeck, C. K. (2017). Overcoming barriers between volunteer professionals advising project-based learning teams with regulation tools. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12550.
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Roosevelt Institute. (2016). Our National network. Retrieved from http://rooseveltinstitute.org/national-network/.
- Slack. (2017). Slack: Where work happens. Retrieved from https://slack.com.
- Smirnov, N., Easterday, M. W., & Gerber, E. M. (2017). Infrastructuring distributed studio networks: A case study and design principles. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1409119.
- Sutherland, J. (2014). Scrum: The art of doing twice the work in half the time. New York, NY: Crown Business.Google Scholar
- Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Yadav, A., Shaver, G. M., & Meckl, P. (2010). Lessons learned: Implementing the case teaching method in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01042.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yadav, A., Subedi, D., Lundeberg, M. A., & Bunting, C. F. (2011). Problem-based learning: Influence on students’ learning in an electrical engineering course. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00013.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, H., Easterday, M. W., Gerber, E. M., Lewis, D. R., & Maliakal, L. (2017). Agile research studios: Orchestrating communities of practice to advance research training. Paper in the proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. Portland, OR, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998199.