Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Co-constructed failure narratives in mathematics tutoring

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ideas students have about what causes math failure are known to impact motivation. This paper throws light on how attributions of failure are negotiated during math tutoring, between 4th/5th graders and volunteer tutors, at a non-profit STEM-based after-school program. The study employs methods of interaction analysis on a small number of cases to qualitatively document how tutor–student dyads co-construct stories about failure. I argue that responses to failure involve constructing obstacles, blaming causes of obstacles, and intervening to resolve obstacles, which take place as part of public practice. By understanding the interactional mechanics of failure, the study can inform discourse-level interventions in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 203–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. Q. III (2015). Addressing the needs of the marginalized students in school mathematics: A review of policies and reforms. In T. G. Bartell, K. N. Bieda, R. T. Putnam, K. Bradfield, & H. Dominguez (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 19–32).

  • Berry, R. Q., Thunder, K., & McClain, O. L. (2011). Counter narratives: Examining the mathematics and racial identities of black boys who are successful with school mathematics. Journal of African American Males in Education, 2(1), 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., Oppezzo, M. A., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the effort towards learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 334–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A. (2014). Welcome to the failure age! New York Times Magazine. Retrieved April 2, 2015, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/16/magazine/welcome-to-the-failure-age.html

  • de Haan, M., & Wissink, I. (2012). The interactive attribution of school success in multi-ethnic schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Personality processes and individual differences, 92(6), 1087–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectation and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberly, M. B., Holley, E. C., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Beyond internal and external: A dyadic theory of relational attributions. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 731–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberly, M. B., Holley, E. C., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2017). It’s Not Me, It’s Not You, It’s Us! An empirical examination of relational attributions. The Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/apl0000187

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, D., & Enyedy, N. (2013). Picking up the mantle of ‘expert’: Assigned roles, assertion of identity, and peer recognition within a programming class. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(2), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, S., & Faulkner, G. (2003). “Actually I was the star”: Managing attributions in conversation. Qualitative Social Research, 4(2)

  • Fishman, E. J., & Husman, J. (2016). Extending attribution theory: Considering students’ perceived control of the attribution process. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/edu0000158

  • Foster, C. (2014). Minimal interventions in the teaching of mathematics. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine Publising.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, M. H. (1990). Tactical uses of stories: Participation frameworks within girls’ and boys’ disputes. Discourse Processes, 13(1), 33–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschall, J. (2012). The storytelling animal: How stories make us human. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1984). Communicating sympathy and anger to black and white children: The cognitive (attributional) consequences of affective cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G., & The Middle School Mathematics Through Application Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodal, T. (2003). Stories for eye, ear, and muscles: Video games, media, and embodied experiences. In M. J. P. Wolf & B. Perron (Eds.), The video game theory reader (pp. 129–155). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hesslow, G. (1988). The problem of causal selection. In D. J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation: Commonsense conceptions of causality (pp. 11–32). Brighton, England: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2015). Vicious cycles of identifying and mathematizing: A case study of the development of mathematical failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.999270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. (2010). “I think I can, but I’m afraid to try”: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and mathematics anxiety in mathematics problem-solving efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 276–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. (1964). How children fail. New York: Delta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P.-L., & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Understanding beliefs, identity, conceptions, and motivation from a discursive psychology perspective. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (2014). The cultural ecosystem of human cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 27(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juul, J. (2013). The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning from generation and invention activities. Instructional Science, 40(4), 645–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: The roles of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazziotti, C., Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). Does collaboration affect learning in a productive failure setting? In J. L. Polman et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 11th international conference of the learning sciences, Vol. 3 (pp. 1184–1185). International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.

  • McGee, E. O., & Stovall, D. (2015). Reimagining critical race theory in education: Mental health, healing, and the pathway to liberatory praxis. Educational Theory, 65(5), 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moschkovich, J. N. (1996). Moving up and getting steeper: Negotiating shared descriptions of linear graphs. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 239–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E., Taylor, C., Rudolph, D., & Smith, R. (1992). Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes, 15, 37–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose (2015, May 14). Why teaching kids to have ‘grit’ isn’t always a good thing. The Washington Post.

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). General expectancies for internal versus external controls of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., & Arena, D. (2013). Measuring what matters most: Choice-based assessments for the digital age. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secules, S., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Turpen, C. (2016, April). “Turning Away” from an undergraduate programming student: Revealing culture in the construction of engineering ability. In paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting.

  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 33(4), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shores, M. L., & Smith, T. (2010). Attribution in mathematics: A review of literature. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidnell, J. (2007). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A., & Maltese, A. (2017). “Failure Is a Major Component of Learning Anything”: The role of failure in the development of STEM professionals. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, S. J., & Raymundo, M. M. (2010). Causal uncertainty and psychological well-being: The moderating role of accommodation (secondary control). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, W., & Slugoski, B. (1988). Conversational and linguistic processes in causal attribution. In D. J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation (pp. 66–93). Brighton, England: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1985). Action identification theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vispoel, W. P., & Austin, J. R. (1995). Success and failure in junior high school: A critical incident approach to understanding students’ attributional beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 377–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weary, G., & Edwards, J. A. (1996). Causal uncertainty and related goal structures. In R. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 148–181)., The interpersonal context New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weary, G., Tobin, S. J., & Edwards, J. E. (2010). The causal uncertainty model revisited. In R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, & P. J. Carroll (Eds.), Handbook of the uncertain self (pp. 78–100). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational psychologist, 45(1), 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, A. (2009). Why programs fail: A guide to systematic debugging. San Fransisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, 4646 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1670, USA

    David DeLiema

Authors
  1. David DeLiema
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David DeLiema.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeLiema, D. Co-constructed failure narratives in mathematics tutoring. Instr Sci 45, 709–735 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9424-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9424-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation