Abstract
This commentary on the special issue, entitled Models and Tools for Systems Learning and Instruction, highlights the accomplishments of the papers in this collection. It also points to some avenues for further strengthening research on promoting systems understanding. Collectively, the papers make advances in our understanding of how to design learning environments to foster systems understanding, how to develop teacher adeptness at orchestrating learning in these environments, and what processes mediate learning within the environments. The papers represent a diversity of methods for measuring learners’ systems understanding, with different kinds of tasks and largely different coding categories for classifying responses; research could be advanced through systematic investigation of these different types of assessment and how they affect findings. Further progress could also be achieved through more detailed descriptions of instructional interventions and through incorporating more design-based research techniques to identify which features of learning environments are responsible for successes and failures in students’ learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2010). Four case studies, six years later: Developing system thinking skills in junior high school and sustaining them over time. The Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1253–1280.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.
Cartwright, N. (2007). Are RCTs the gold standard? BioSocieties, 2, 11–20.
Cartwright, N., & Munro, E. (2010). The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 260–266.
Clark, D., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 343–374.
Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to support and understand learning processes. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 68–95). New York: Routledge.
Danish, J. A. (2014). Applying an activity theory lens to designing instruction for learning about the structure, behavior, and function of a honeybee systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 100–148.
Danish, J., Saleh, A., Andrade, A., & Bryan, B. (2017). Observing complex systems thinking in the zone of proximal development. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9391-z.
Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 606–609.
Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer.
Grotzer, T. A., & Sudbury, M. (2000). Moving beyond underlying linear causal models of electrical circuits. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Grotzer, T. A., Solis, S. L., Tutwiler, M. S., & Cuzzolino, M. P. (2017). A study of students’ reasoning about probabilistic causality: Implications for understanding complex systems and for instructional design. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9389-6.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jordan, R., Eberbach, C., & Sinha, S. (2017). Systems learning with a conceptual representation: A quasi-experimental study. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9392-y.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Liu, L., Gray, S., & Jordan, R. (2015). Using representational tools to learn about complex systems: A tale of two classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 6–35.
Liu L. (2008). Trajectories of collaborative scientific conceptual change: Middle school students learning about ecosystems in a CSCL environment. PhD Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48, 114–133.
Sandoval, W. A. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 18–36.
Solomon, M. (2001). Social empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Solomon, M. (2015). Making medical knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tripto, J., Assaraf, O. B. Z., Snapir, Z., & Amit, M. (2017). How is the body’s systemic nature manifested amongst high school biology students? Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9390-0.
Yoon, S. A. (2011). Using social network graphs as visualization tools to influence peer selection decision-making strategies to access information about complex socioscientific issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 549–588.
Yoon, S. A., Anderson, E., Koehler-Yom, J., Evans, C., Park, M., Sheldon, J., Schoenfeld, I., Wendel, D., Scheintaub, H., & Klopfer, E. (2017). Teaching about complex systems is no simple matter: Building effective professional development for computer-supported complex systems instruction. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9388-7.
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to the guest editors, Susan Yoon and Cindy Hmelo-Silver, for their valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chinn, C.A. Commentary: Promoting systems understanding. Instr Sci 45, 123–135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9406-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9406-4