Skip to main content

Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection

Instructional Science volume 42, pages 443–463 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

There is a general consensus among researchers and teacher educators that classroom video can be a valuable tool for pre-service teacher education. Media such as video are not, however, in themselves effective. They have to be embedded in an instructional program to be useful. Yet, little empirical research examines how specific instructional approaches might effectively exploit the potential of video in teacher education. In this study we explored the use of two video-based university courses, one representing a cognitive instructional strategy integrating video, the other representing a situative strategy. Using data from learning journals we analyzed the effects of the two strategies on pre-service teachers’ (N = 28) ability to reflect on classroom video. We found that the two strategies have distinct impacts on the kinds of reflection patterns that are fostered. Our findings suggest that the learning goal and purpose at hand should determine which instructional strategy should be employed when embedding classroom video into teacher education courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51, 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayram, L. (2012). Use of online video cases in teacher training. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1007–1011. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X015007007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (1991). Perceptions of student behavior as a function of expertise. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthold, K., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2007). Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 17, 564–577. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417–436. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473–498. doi:10.3102/00028312026004473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2004). Using video in teacher education. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, N. (2007). Imaging teacher learning: A literature review on the use of digital video for preservice teacher education and teacher professionalization. Nijmegen: ILS Graduate School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, J. R., Fusaro, J. A., & Dougherty, E. A. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of journal writing on learning social studies: A comparative study. Reading Psychology, 21, 1–11. doi:10.1080/027027100278310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21–29. doi:10.1007/BF02299088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited. Educational Technology, 33, 52–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Eds.), Knowing, learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Conner-Greene, P. A. (2000). Problem-based service learning: The evolution of a team project. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 193–197. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2903_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 120–138. doi:10.1177/0022487105283796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Franscisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drechsel, B. (2001). Subjektive Lernbegriffe und Interesse am Thema Lernen bei angehenden Lehrpersonen [Subjective conceptions of learning and interest in the subject of learning among pre-service teachers]. Münster: Waxmann.

  • Erickson, F. (2007). Ways of seeing video: Toward a phenomenology of viewing minimally edited footage. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 145–155). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evertson, C. M., & Green, J. L. (1986). Observation as inquiry and method. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 162–213). New York, London: Macmillian Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1978). Metacognitive development. In J.M.Scandura & C.J.Brainerd (Eds.), Structural/process theories of complex human behavior (pp. 213–245). Alphen aan den Rijin: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.

  • Flavell, J. H., Beach, D. R., & Chinsky, J. M. (1966). Spontaneous verbal rehearsal memory tasks as a function of age. Child Development, 37, 283–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F. F., & Manning, B. A. (1973). Self-confrontation review: A conceptualization for video playback in teacher education. Review of Educational Research, 43, 469–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilar, R., de los Angeles Martinez Ruiz, M., & Castéjon Costa, J. L. (2007). Diary-based strategy assessment and its relationship to performance in a group of trainee teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 1334–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glogger, I., Schwonke, R., Holzäpfel, L., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2012). Learning strategies assessed by journal writing: Prediction of learning outcomes by quantity, quality, and combinations of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 452–468. doi:10.1037/a0026683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Denny, S. J. (Eds.). (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, L. M., Sherin, M. G., Griesdorn, J., & Finn, L.-E. (2008). Creating social relationships: The role of technology in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 117–131. doi:10.1177/0022487107314001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1989). Situations, mental models and generative knowledge. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 285–318). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Gruber, H., Law, L.-C., Mandl, H., & Renkl, A. (1995). Situated learning and transfer. In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 168–188). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Shulman, L. (2002). Toward expert thinking: How curriculum case-writing prompts the development of theory-based professional knowledge in student teachers. Teacher Education, 13, 221–245. doi:10.1080/1047621022000007594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 47–61. doi:10.1177/0022487106295726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogveld, A. W. M., Paas, F., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2005). Training higher education teachers for instructional design of competency-based education: Product-oriented versus process-oriented worked examples. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 287–297. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, N. B., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 172–181. doi:10.1177/0022487109347875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koc, M. (2011). Let’s make a movie: Investigating pre-service teachers’ reflections on using video-recorded role playing cases in Turkey. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 95–106. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 157–176. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K., Ratzka, N., Klieme, E., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2006). Learning with classroom videos: Conception and first results of an online teacher-training program. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38, 422–432. doi:10.1007/BF02652803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A., & Weidenmann, B. (Eds.). (2006). Pädagogische psychologie [educational psychology]. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (2007). Is direct instruction an answer to the right question? Educational Psychologist, 42, 109–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2009). The building of pre-service primary teachers’ knowledge of mathematics teaching: Interaction and online video case studies. Instructional Science, 37, 247–271. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9043-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K., & Ahola, K. (1995). Activating instruction: How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 351–368. doi:10.1007/BF03172926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loud, B. (1999). Effects of journal writing on attitudes, beliefs, and achievement of students in a college mathematics course (PhD thesis, Boston University, 1999).

  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology. European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, B., Mitchell, N., & Adamczyk, P. (2010). Interactive video technology: Enhancing professional learning in initial teacher education. Computers & Education, 54, 742–748. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masingila, J. O., & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analyses of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 235–263. doi:10.1023/A:1019847825912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrindle, A., & Christensen, C. (1995). The impact of learning journal on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performances. Learning and Instruction, 5, 167–185. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00010-Z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In R. Goldmann, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321–334). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576. doi:10.3102/00346543074004557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6 for windows [computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31, 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking a social practice. In L. B. Resnik, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reusser, K. (2005–2009). Videoportal. http://www.didac.uzh.ch/videoportal/. Retrieved 4 June 2010.

  • Roth, W.-M. (2007). Epistemic mediation: Video data as filters for the objectification of teaching by teachers. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 367–382). Mahawah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Difference among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensionality, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 63–88. doi:10.3102/00028312028001063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R., & Angelici, G. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on pre-service teachers’ ability to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 339–349. doi:10.1177/0022487110369555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM the International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43, 133–145. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0292-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 123–140. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9029-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G. (2009). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 11–16. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1983.tb01086.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M., Gog, V. T., & Paas, F. (2006). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, P. G., Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Ataya, R., Teale, W. H., & Labbo, L. D. (2003). Using internet delivered video cases, to support pre-service teachers’ understanding of effective early literacy instruction: An exploratory study. Instructional Science, 31, 317–340. doi:10.1023/A:1024690111227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 285–296. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seago, N. (2004). Using video as an object of inquiry mathematics teaching and learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 259–285). Amsterdam: Advances in Research on Teaching.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Rimmele, R., Kobarg, M., Schwindt, K., & Meyer, L. (2005). Do videos really matter?—An experimental study on the use of video in teacher professional development. In C. P. Constantinou, D. Demetriou, A. Evagorou, M. Evagorou, A. Kofteros, M. Michael, C. Nicolaou, D. Papademetriou & N. Papadouris (Eds.), 11th European conference for research on learning and instruction (pp. 1117–1118). Nicosia: University of Cyprus.

  • Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Schwindt, K., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., & Kobarg, M. (2009). LUV and observe: Two projects using video to diagnose teachers’ competence. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, L., Hu, C., Crawford, L., Gopinathan, S., Khine, M. S., & Moo, S. N. (2003). Enhancing multipoint desktop video conferencing (MDVC) with lesson video clips: Recent developments in pre-service teaching practice in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 529–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1–28). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37. doi:10.1177/0022487108328155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockero, S. L. (2008). Using a video-based curriculum to develop a reflective stance in prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 373–394. doi:10.1007/s10857-008-9079-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (Eds.). (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 100–137. doi:10.1080/10508400802581668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 39–64. doi:10.1007/BF02504993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2012). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Merriënboer, J., Kirschner, P., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5–13. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. D. (1995). Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 325–349. doi:10.1007/BF03172925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. L., Yung, B. H. W., Cheng, M. W., Lam, K. L., & Hodson, D. (2006). Setting the stage for developing pre-service teachers’ conceptions of good science teaching: The role of classroom videos. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1–24. doi:10.1080/09500690500239805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. (2008). How to optimize learning from animated models: A review of guidelines based on cognitive load. Review of Educational Research, 78, 645–675. doi:10.3102/003465430832032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K., & Paas, F. (2007). Interactivity in video-based models. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 327–342. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9045-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, SE 1397/2-1/2). We would like to thank all pre-service teachers who participated in this study. We also thank Kathleen Kemter and Anne Töpfer for their assistance in coding the learning journal data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TUM School of Education, Technische Universität München, Schellingstr. 33, 80799, Munich, Germany

    Geraldine Blomberg & Tina Seidel

  2. School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University, 2120 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL, 60208-0001, USA

    Miriam Gamoran Sherin

  3. Department of Psychology, Educational and Developmental Psychology, University of Freiburg, Engelbergerstr. 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany

    Alexander Renkl & Inga Glogger

Authors
  1. Geraldine Blomberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miriam Gamoran Sherin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Renkl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Inga Glogger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tina Seidel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geraldine Blomberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blomberg, G., Sherin, M.G., Renkl, A. et al. Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection. Instr Sci 42, 443–463 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9281-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9281-6

Keywords

  • Teacher education
  • Classroom video
  • Instructional design
  • Reflection skills
  • Learning journals