Clifford, M. M. (1984). Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure. Educational Psychologist,
Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction,
Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science,
Kapur, M. (2011). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science,
Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9209-6.
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,
Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,
Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2009). The assistance dilemma in CSCL. In A. Dimitracopoulou, C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning practices-CSCL2009 community events proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 37–42). New Brunswick: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist,
Needham, D. R., & Begg, I. M. (1991). Problem-oriented training promotes spontaneous analogical transfer: Memory-oriented training promotes memory for training. Memory and Cognition,
Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in complex learning environments: What have we gained and what have we missed. Educational Psychologist,
Richland, L. E., Kornell, N., & Kao, L. S. (2009). The pretesting effect: Do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,
15(3), 243–257. doi:10.1037/a0016496.
Roll, I., Holmes, N. G., Day, J., & Bonn, D. (2012). Evaluating metacognitive scaffolding in guided invention activities. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9208-7.
Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist,
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207–217.
Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction,
Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction,
Strand-Cary, M., & Klahr, D. (2008). Developing elementary science skills: Instructional effectiveness and path independence. Cognitive Development,
23(4), 488–511. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.005.
Sweller, J. (2010). What human cognitive architecture tells us about constructivism. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure (pp. 127–143). New York: Routledge.
Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure. New York: Routledge.
VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W. B. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction,
Westermann, K., & Rummel, N. (2012). Delaying instruction: Evidence from a study in a university relearning setting. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9207-8.
Wiedmann, M., Leach, R. C., Rummel, N., & Wiley, J. (2012). Does group composition affect learning by invention? Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9204-y.