Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The relationship between approaches to teaching, approaches to e-teaching and perceptions of the teaching situation in relation to e-learning among higher education teachers

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study extends prior research on approaches to teaching and perceptions of the teaching situation by investigating these elements when e-learning is involved. In this study, approaches to teaching ranged from a focus on the teacher and the taught content to a focus on the student and their learning, resembling those reported in previous investigations. Approaches to e-teaching ranged from a focus on information transmission to a focus on communication and collaboration. An analysis of perceptions of the teaching situation in relation to e-learning identified key themes influencing adopted approaches: control of teaching, institutional strategy, pedagogical and technological support, time required, teacher skills for using e-learning, and student abilities and willingness for using learning technology. Associations between these elements showed three groups of teachers: one focusing on transmission of information teaching both face-to-face and online while having a general negative perception of the teaching situation in relation to e-learning; a second focusing on student learning both face-to-face and online while having a general positive perception; and a third presenting unexpected patterns of associations. These results may be helpful for supporting different groups of teachers in employing e-learning in their on-campus units of study. At the same time, further research is proposed for inquiring into specific approaches in different disciplines and different university contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Agostinho, S. (2009). Learning design: Representations to document, model, and share teaching practice. In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications, and technologies (pp. 1–19). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2005a). Learning about phenomenography: Interviewing, data analysis and the qualitative research paradigm doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 63–74). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2005b). Phenomenographic methods: A case illustration doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 103–127). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2005c). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(4), 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. (2000). Experience of phenomenographic research: A personal account. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 47–61). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (2004). The university of learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, B., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in Psychology (3), 77–101.

  • Brew, A. (2006). Research and teaching: Beyond the divide. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. A., Hughes, J., Weyers, M., & Riding, P. (2009). University teacher approaches to design and teaching and concepts of learning technologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R., Steed, A., & Applebee, A. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 312–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, P., Kitay, J., & Prosser, M. (2008). Developing conceptions of teaching and the scholarship of teaching through a Graduate Certificate in Higher Education. The International Journal for Academic Development, 13, 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P., & Retalis, S. (Eds.). (2010). Technology-enhanced learning: Design patterns and pattern languages. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. Definition, current trends and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning. Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Kwan, K. P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28(5–6), 469–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., Kwan, K.-P., & Ledesma, J. (2001). Conceptions of good teaching and how they influence the way adults and school leavers are taught. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(5), 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-learning 2(1), Retrieved December 27, 2010 http://www.wwwords.co.uk/pdf/validate.asp?j=elea&vol=2012&issue=2011&year=2005&article=2013_Oliver_ELEA_2012_2011_web.

  • Postareff, L., Katajavuori, N., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Trigwell, K. (2008). Consonance and dissonance in descriptions of teaching of university teachers. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M. (2000). Using phenomenographic research methodology in the context of research in teaching and learning. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 34–46). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., Martin, E., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Middleton, H. (2008). University academics’ experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instructional Science, 36(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching : the experience in higher education. Buckingham [England], Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the approaches to teaching inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London; New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (1997). Perceptions of academic leadership and the effectiveness of university teaching. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian association for research in education. Brisbane, Australia.

  • Roberts, G. (2003). Teaching using the web: Conceptions and approaches from a phenomenographic perspective. Instructional Science, 31(1–2), 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K. (2000). A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography. In J. Bowden & E. Walsh (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 63–82). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32(1), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching 1st year university science. Higher Education, 27(1), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos González.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González, C. The relationship between approaches to teaching, approaches to e-teaching and perceptions of the teaching situation in relation to e-learning among higher education teachers. Instr Sci 40, 975–998 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9198-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9198-x

Keywords

Navigation