Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Visual perspectives within educational computer games: effects on presence and flow within virtual immersive learning environments

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mis-categorizing of cognitive states involved in learning within virtual environments has complicated instructional technology research. Further, most educational computer game research does not account for how learning activity is influenced by factors of game content and differences in viewing perspectives. This study is a qualitative exploration into the nature of flow—the state of being absorbed by an activity, and presence—the sense of “being there” in a virtual learning environment. This study follows players’ experiences within an immersive environment, with the notion of “immersive” being the extent to which the computer system delivers a surrounding environment. The data analysis includes videotaped activity, transcripts and interviews of six different games, three of which have explicit learning objectives derived from two different genres. While viewing perspective was previously thought to have significant influence on presence, flow, and learning, these findings suggest that four emergent categories (content, emotion, motivation, engagement) have more influence than perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azuma, R. T., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computers and Graphics, 21, 34–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Alcañiz, M., Liaño, V., Guerrero, B., & Rey, B. (2003). Immersion and emotion: Their impact on the sense of presence. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6(5), 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual Solar System project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 719–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E., & Cairns, P. (2004). A grounded investigation of game immersion. In Extended abstracts of the 2004 conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1297–1300). New York: ACM Press.

  • Bystrom, E. K., Barfield, W., & Hendrix, C. (1999). A conceptual model of the sense of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(2), 241–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. (1982). The art of computer game design. Berkeley, CA: McGraw-Hill/Osborne Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C., (1997). Chapter 2: Why do people play games? The Art of Computer Game Design: Washington State University. From http://www.vancouver.wsu.edu/fac/peabody/game-book/Chapter2.html. Accessed 1 Dec 2008.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience (pp. 364–383). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C., Salzman, M. C., Loftin, R. B., & Sprague, D. (1999). Multisensory immersion as a modeling environment for learning complex scientific concepts. In W. Feurzeig & N. Roberts (Eds.), Computer modeling and simulation in science education (pp. 282–319). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epic Games, Digital Extremes (2003) Unreal Tournament 2003. GT Interactive.

  • Fjeld, M., Schar, S. G., Signorello, D., & Krueger, H. (2002). Alternative tools for tangible interaction: A usability evaluation. Paper presented at the IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), Darmstadt, Germany.

  • Fontaine, G. (1992). The experience of a sense of presence in intercultural and international encounters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(4), 482–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, I. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Science., 4, 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1983). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 311–334). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, D. Y. (2001). The pleasures of immersion and engagement: Schemas, scripts and the fifth business. Digital Creativity, 12(3), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, N. R., Billinghurst, M., Postner, L., May, R., & Kato, H. (2002). Explorations in the use of augmented reality for geographic visualization. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S., & Marsh, H. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1996). FooM. dI Software.

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, R., Fournier, E., & Lopez, J. C. (2008). Perspective-based feedback in a virtual world training simulation and the effects on learning. Paper presented at Games, Learning & Society, Madison, WI.

  • Marsh, H., & Jackson, S. (1999). Flow experience in sport: Construct validation of multidimensional, hierarchical state and trait responses. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(4), 343–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, A. (2003). Chapter 3: Immersion, engagement, and presence: A method for analyzing 3-D video games. In M. J. P. Wolf (Ed.), The medium of the video game (pp. 135–158). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paras, B., & Bizzocchi, J. (2005, June 16–20). Game, motivation, and effective learning: An integrated model for educational game design. Paper presented at the Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA): Changing Views—Worlds in Play, Vancouver, BC.

  • Rieber, L. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robillard, G., Bouchard, S., Fournier, T., & Renaud, P. (2003). Anxiety and presence during VR immersion: A comparative study of the reactions of phobic and non-phobic participants in therapeutic virtual environments derived from computer games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6(5), 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogue Entertainment. (2000). American McGee’s Alice. Redwood City, CA: Electronic Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoresby, J., Duncan, S. M., & Shelton, B. E. (2006). Voices of Spoon River: Exploring early American poetry through computer gaming. Paper presented at Games, Learning & Society, Madison, WI.

  • Shelton, B. E. (2007). Designing educational games for activity-goal alignment. In B. E. Shelton & D. Wiley (Eds.), The design and use of simulation computer games in education (pp. 103–130). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 120–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., Bauer, M. I., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). Melding the power of serious games and embedded assessment to monitor and foster learning: Flow and grow. In U. Ritterfeld, M. J. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), The social science of serious games: Theories and applications (pp. 295–321). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, M. (1999). Measuring presence: A response to the Witmer and Singer presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 8(5), 560–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, M. (2003). A note on presence terminology, from http://presence.cs.ucl.ac.uk/presenceconnect/articles/Jan2003/melslaterJan27200391557/melslaterJan27200391557.html. Accessed 1 Dec 2008.

  • Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T., Shelton, B. E. & Scoresby, J. (2006). Voices of Spoon River 3D. http://cle.usu.edu/CLE_VOSR_3D.html.

  • Stratum, L. S. (2006). Voices of Spoon River. http://cle.usu.edu/CLE_IF_VOSR.html .

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. N. (2002). Video games: Perspective, point-of-view, and immersion. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.

  • Vogeley, K., & Fink, G. R. (2003). Neural correlates of first-person-perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vora, J., Nair, S., Gramopadhye, A. K., Duchowski, A. T., Melloy, B. J., & Kanki, B. (2002). Using virtual reality technology for aircraft visual inspection training: Presence and comparison studies. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W., & Windschitl, M. (2002, April). Strategies used by university students to learn aspects of physical oceanography in a virtual environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Winn, W., Windschitl, M., Fruland, R., & Lee, Y. (2002, October). When does immersion in a virtual environment help students construct understanding? Paper presented at the International Conference on the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Seattle, WA.

  • Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, E., Billinghurst, M., Aldridge, G., & Garrie, B. (2003). Augmenting the Science Centre and Museum experience. Paper presented at the Association for Computing Machinery Conference 2003, Sydney, Australia.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the efforts of the Utah State University Spring 2005 Instructional Games class (a.k.a. Luscious Sanguine Stratum) for their work in developing VOSR. We would also like to thank Tim Stowell for his work in the development of VOSR 3D. This research was partially funded by the office of the Vice President for Research Office at Utah State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Instructional Technology and Learning Sciences, Utah State University, 2830 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322, USA

    Jon Scoresby & Brett E. Shelton

Authors
  1. Jon Scoresby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brett E. Shelton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett E. Shelton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scoresby, J., Shelton, B.E. Visual perspectives within educational computer games: effects on presence and flow within virtual immersive learning environments. Instr Sci 39, 227–254 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9126-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9126-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation