Skip to main content

Reanalyzing the expertise reversal effect

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L., & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., Hertzog, C., Kennedy, M. R. T., & Tiede, K. W. (2005). The self-monitoring approach for effective learning. Cognitive Technology, 9(1), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S. (2000). When using sound with a text or picture is not beneficial for learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologis, 38(2), 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2001a). Learner experience and efficiency of instructional guidance. Educational Psychology, 21, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001b). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K., & Aleven, V. (2007). Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with cognitive tutors. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, W., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., & Van Gog, T. (2006). Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 16, 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 419–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.). (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen. Diagnostica, 47, 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W., Fries, S., & Horz, H. (2009). Motivational aspects of cognitive load theory. In M. Wosnitza, S. Karabenick, A. Efklides & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 69–96). Hogrefe & Huber.

  • Schnotz, W., & Heiß, A. (2009). Semantic scaffolds in hypermedia learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Melbourne: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 215–266). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 19–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2000). Does motivation affect performance via persistence?. Learning and Instruction, 10, 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotski, L. S. (1963). Learning and mental development at school age In B. Simon & J. Simon (Hrsg.), Educational psychology in the U.S.S.R. (S. 21–34). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Schnotz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnotz, W. Reanalyzing the expertise reversal effect. Instr Sci 38, 315–323 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9104-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9104-y

Keywords

  • Cognitive Load
  • Work Memory Capacity
  • Goal Orientation
  • Redundant Information
  • Cognitive Load Theory