Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instruction effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 218–238.
Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191–205.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2003). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11, 717–726.
Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory foccus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35–66.
Brown, F. J. (1932). Knowledge of results as an incentive in school room practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 23(7), 532–552.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-Explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409–426.
Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23(3), 260–294.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggert, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.
Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–339.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.
Grimm, N. (1986). Improving students’ responses to their peers’ essays. College Composition and Communication, 37(1), 91–94.
Haswell, R. H. (2005). NCTE/CCCC’s recent war on scholarship. Written Communication, 22(2), 198–223.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Stratman, J., & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, Volume II: Reading, writing, and language processing (pp. 176–240). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hull, C. L. (1935). Thorndike’s fundamentals of learning. Psychological Bulletin, 32, 807–823.
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill Praise and criticism in written feedback, Jouranl of Second Language Writing, 10, 185–212.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349–371.
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In L. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 57–71). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Kieras, D. E., & Bovair, S. (1984). The role of a mental model in learning to operate a devise. Cognitive Science, 8, 255–273.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279–308.
Kulhavy, R. W., & Wager, W. (1993). Feedback in programmed instruction: Historical context and implications for practice. In J. V. Dempsey, & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 3–20). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
Landis, J. R., Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432.
Matsumura, L. C., Patthey-Chavez, G. G., Valdes, R., & Garnier, H. (2002). Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and third-grade students’ revision in lower- and higher-achieving urban schools. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 3–25.
McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychological Review, 8(3), 299–325.
Miller, P. J. (2003). The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(4), 383–394.
Mory, E. H. (1996). Feedback research. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 919–956). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology Second Edition (pp. 745–783). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Neuwirth, C. M., Chandhok, R., Charney, D., Wojahn, P., & Kim, L. (1994). Distributed Collaborative writing: A comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents. Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction ‘94 Conference, April 24–28, 1994, Boston Massachusetts (pp. 51–57). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewoods Clis, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nilson, L. B. (2003). Improving student peer feedback. College Teaching, 51(1), 34–38.
Novick, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(3), 398–415.
Olson, M. W., & Raffeld, P. (1987). The effects of written comments on the quality of student compositions and the learning of content. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 8, 273–293.
Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple device which gives tests and scores—and teaches. School and Society, 23, 373–376.
Pressey, S. L. (1927). A machine for automatic teaching of drill material. School and Society, 25, 549–552.
Roediger, H. L. (2007). Twelve Tips for Reviewers. APS Observer, 20(4), 41–43.
Saddler, B., & Andrade, H. (2004). The writing rubric. Educational Leadership, 62(2), 48–52.
Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy X value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 447–458.
Sternberg, R. J. (2002). On civility in reviewing. APS Observer, 15(1).
Sugita, Y. (2006). The impact of teachers’ comment types on students’ revision. ELT Journal, 60(1), 34–41.
Symonds, P. M., & Chase, D. H. (1929). Practice vs. motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 20(1), 19–35.
Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. American Journal of Psychology, 39(1/4), 212–222.
Toegel, G., & Conger, J. A. (2003). 360-degree assessment: Time for Reinvention. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(3), 297–311.
Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2006). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education.
Wallace, D. L., & Hayes, J. R. (1991). Redefining revision for freshman. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 54–66.
Wallach, H., & Henle, M. (1941). An experimental analysis of the Law of Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 340–349.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading and the amount of breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.