Skip to main content
Log in

Does the amount of on-screen text influence student learning from a multimedia-based instructional unit?

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examines how changes in the amount of on-screen text will influence student learning from a multimedia instructional unit on basic concepts of coordinate geometry. The relative effectiveness of two different versions (short-text and whole-text) of the instructional unit was examined for students who differed in terms of their ability to remember symbolic units, symbolic systems and symbolic interpretations. A total of 101 seventh graders were randomly assigned to work with either the whole-text or the short-text version. Student gains were analyzed using pre-test, post-test and retention test scores. Memory ability was assessed by the sub-tests of the Structure of Intellect-Learning Abilities Test. Results indicated no significant differences between groups who worked with short-text and whole-text versions. However retention scores of high and low memory groups who worked with the whole-text version showed significant differences. The whole-text version was observed to favor students with high memory for symbolic implications. Results suggest that workability of design principles for multimedia instruction may depend on the nature of the task and characteristics of the learner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyselinck, V., Ehrlich, M. F., Cornoldi, C., de Beni, R., & Dubois, V. (2000). Visuospatial working memory in learning from multimedia systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split attention effecting multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extention of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, M, & Meeker, R. J. (1983). Structure of intellect: Learning abilities test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000a). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2000b). Meaningful design for meaningful learning: Applying cognitive theory to multimedia explanations. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2000(1) (pp. 782–787). [Online] Available: http://www.dl.aace.org/1387

  • Mousavi, S.Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, O., & Etgen, M. P. (2000). Research based principles for multimedia presentation. In J. M. Spector & T. M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology (pp. 197–212). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory: Learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994) Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 257–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, P. L., Hunt, E. B., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1991). Coordinating cognitive information: task effects and individual differences in integrating information from several sources. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 615–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilek Ardaç.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ardaç, D., Unal, S. Does the amount of on-screen text influence student learning from a multimedia-based instructional unit?. Instr Sci 36, 75–88 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9035-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9035-4

Keywords

Navigation