Instructional Science

, Volume 33, Issue 5–6, pp 483–511 | Cite as

Scaffolding Peer-questioning Strategies to Facilitate Metacognition During Online Small Group Discussion

  • Ikseon Choi
  • Susan M. Land
  • Alfred J. Turgeon


Meaningful discussion that facilitates reflective thinking can be initiated when learners raise thoughtful questions or provide critical feedback; however, generating effective questions requires a certain level of domain knowledge and metacognitive skills of the question-askers. We propose a peer-questioning scaffolding framework intended to facilitate metacognition and learning through scaffolding effective peer-questioning in online discussion. This framework assumes that novice students who lack domain and metacognitive knowledge can be scaffolded to generate meaningful interactions at an early stage of learning and the resulting peer-generated adaptive questions can facilitate learners’ metacognition. Thus, this study investigated the effects of providing online scaffolding for generating adaptive questions to peers during online small group discussion. A field experimental time-series control-group design was employed as a mixed model for the research design. Thirty-nine college students from an online introductory class on turfgrass management participated in the study. The findings revealed that the scaffolds were useful to increase the frequency of student questioning behavior during online discussion. For some students, the online guidance reportedly served as “a starting point” to generate questions when they had difficulty asking questions. However, the guidance did not improve the quality of questions and thus learning outcomes. The interview data indicated that peer-generated adaptive questions served a critical role in facilitating learner’s reflection and knowledge reconstruction. Further study should focus on the quality improvement of peer-generated questions while considering adaptive and dynamic forms of scaffolding and intermediate factors such as prior knowledge, metacognition, task complexity, and scaffolding type.


Online Discussion Metacognitive Knowledge Metacognitive Skill Reflective Thinking Meaningful Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abowd, G.D., da Graca Pimentel, M., Ishiguro, Y., Kerimbaev, B. & Guzdial, M. (1999). Anchoring discussion in lecture: An approach to collaboratively extending classroom digital media. Paper presented at the Computer Supportive Collaborative Learning ‘99.Google Scholar
  2. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G., Thomas, L., Seibert, D., Tron, M. 2003Online process scaffolding and students’ self-regulated learning with hypermediaPaper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research AssociationChicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  3. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G., Seibert, D., Tron, M. 2003The role of co-regulated learning during students’ understanding of complex systems with hypermediaPaper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research AssociationChicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, P. 1997Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groupsPaper presented at the CSCL’97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative LearningTorontoGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, P., Linn, M. 1997Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning on the webPaper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA)Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  6. Berge, Z.L. 1997Characteristics of online teaching in post-secondary, formal educationEducational Technology373547Google Scholar
  7. Berge, Z.L. 2000Designing discussion questions for online, adult learningEducational Technology405356Google Scholar
  8. Berk, R.A. 1984A guide to criterion-referenced test constructionThe Johns Hopkins University PressBaltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, A.L. 1989Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisitionResnick, L.B. eds. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert GlaserLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ393451Google Scholar
  10. Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C. 1994Guided discovery in a community of learnersMcGilly, K. eds. Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom PracticeMIT PressCambridge229270Google Scholar
  11. Brown A.L. & Palincsar A.S. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In: D.J.D. & J.G. Borkowski eds, Intelligence and Exceptionality: New Directions for Theory, Assessment, and Instructional Practices pp. 81–132. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  12. Chi, M.T.H., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., Glaser, R. 1989Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problemsCognitive Science13145182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi, I., Land, S.M. 2004Collaboration and negotiation tool for case-based Instruction (CoNet-C)Kovalchick, A.Dawson, K. eds. Education and Technology: An EncyclopediaABC-CLIOSanta Barbara, CA121125Google Scholar
  14. Chong, S.-M. 1998Models of asynchronous computer conferencing for collaborative learning in large college classesBonk, C.J.King, K.S. eds. Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and DiscourseLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ157182Google Scholar
  15. Crook, C. 1994Computers and the collaborative experiences of learningRoutledgeLondon; New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. De Lisi, R., Golbeck, S.L. 1999Implications of Piagetian theory for peer learningO’Donnell, A.M.King, A. eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Peer LearningLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJ337Google Scholar
  17. Dillon, J.T. 1986Student questions and individual learningEducational Theory36333341Google Scholar
  18. Dillon, J.T. 1994Using discussion in classroomsOpen University PressBuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  19. Edelson, D.C., O’Neill, K. 1994The CoVis collaboratory notebook: Computer support for scientific inquiryPaper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA)New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  20. Foote, C.J. 1998Student-generated higher order questioning as a study strategyThe Journal of Educational Research92107113Google Scholar
  21. Forman, E.A., Cazden, C.B. 1985Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interactionWertsch, J.V. eds. Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian PerspectivesCambridge University PressNew York323347Google Scholar
  22. Forman, E.A., Kraker, M.J. 1985The social origins of logic: The contirbutions of Piaget and VygotskyBerkowitz, M.W. eds. Peer Conflict and Psychological GrowthJossey-BassSan Francisco2339Google Scholar
  23. Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., Gall, J.P. 1996Educational research: An introduction6LongmanWhite Plains, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Garner, R., Alexander, P.A. 1989Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questionsEducational Psychologist24143158Google Scholar
  25. Greene, B., Land, S. 2000A qualitative analysis of scaffolding use in a resource-based learning environment involving the world wide webJournal of Educational Computing Research23151179Google Scholar
  26. Hannafin, M.J., Land, S.M. 2000Technology and student-centered learning in higher education: Issues and practicesJournal of Computing in Higher Education12330Google Scholar
  27. Harasim, L.M. 1990Online education: An environment for collaboration and intellectual amplificationHarasim, L.M. eds. Online Education: Perspectives on a New EnvironmentPraegerNew York3964Google Scholar
  28. Hsi, S., Hoadley, C.M. 1997Productive discussion in science: Gender equity through electronic discourseJournal of Science Education62336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huba, M.E. & Freed, J.E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. : Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  30. Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., Wilson, B.G. 1999Learning with technology: A constructivist perspectivePrentice-Hall, IncUpper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  31. King, A. 1989Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lecturesContemporary Educational Psychology14366381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King, A. 1990Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioningAmerican Educational Research Journal27664687Google Scholar
  33. King, A. 1991Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem-solving performanceJournal of Educational Psychology83307317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. King, A. 1992Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioningEducational Psychologist27111126Google Scholar
  35. King, A. 1994Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explainAmerican Educational Research Journal31338368Google Scholar
  36. King, A., Rosenshine, B. 1993Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children’s knowledge constructionJournal of Experimental Education61127148Google Scholar
  37. King, A., Staffieri, A., Adelgais, A. 1998Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learningJournal of Educational Psychology90134152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koschmann, T., Kelson, A.C., Feltovich, P.J., Barrows, H.S. 1996Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learningKoschmann, T. eds. CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Ememrging ParadigmLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah: New Jersey83124Google Scholar
  39. Land, S.M. 2000Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environmentsEducational Technology: Research and Development486178Google Scholar
  40. Meij, H. 1990Question asking: To know that you do not know is not enoughJournal of Educational Psychology82505512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meij, H. 1998The great divide between teacher and student questioningKarabenick, S.A. eds. Strategic Help Seeking: Implications for Learning and TeachingLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, Mahwah, NJ195218Google Scholar
  42. Miyake, N., Norman, S.A. 1979To ask a question, one must know enough to know what is not knownJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18357364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nitko, A.J. 1999Educational assessment of studentsPrentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  44. Palincsar, A.S. 1986The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instructionEducational Psychologist217398Google Scholar
  45. Palincsar, A.S. 1998Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learningAnnual Review of Psychology49345375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Palincsar, A.S., Brown, A.L. 1984Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activitiesCognition and Instruction1117175Google Scholar
  47. Palincsar, A.S., Brown, A.L. 1988Teaching and practicing thinking skills to promote comprehension in the context of group problem solvingRemedial and Special Education95359Google Scholar
  48. Palincsar, A.S., Brown, A.L. 1989Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehensionBrophy, J. eds. Advances in Research on TeachingJAI Press IncGreenwich, Connecticut3571Google Scholar
  49. Palincsar, A.S., Brown, A.L., Martin, S. 1987Peer interaction in reading comprehension instructionEducational Psychologist22231253Google Scholar
  50. Piaget J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development (T. Brown & K.L. Thampy, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. 1991Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge mediaJournal of the Learning Science13768Google Scholar
  52. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. 1996aAdaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schoolingVosniadou, S.De Corte, E.Glaser, R.Mandl, H. eds. International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning EnvironmentsLawrence Erlbaum AssociateHillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  53. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. 1996bComputer support for knowledge-building communitiesKoschmann, T. eds. CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging ParadigmLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah: New Jersey249268Google Scholar
  54. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Lamon, M. 1994The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3McGilly, K. eds. Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom PracticeMIT PressCambridge201228Google Scholar
  55. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R.S., Swallow, J., Woodruff, E. 1989Computer-supported intentional learning environmentsJournal of Educational Computing Research55168Google Scholar
  56. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Steinbach, R. 1984Teachability of reflexive processes in written compositionCognitive Science8173190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schank, R.C., Cleary, C. 1995Engines for educationLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  58. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., Coulson, R.L. 1992Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domainsDuffy, T.M.Jonassen, D.H. eds. Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A ConversationLawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, New Jersey5775Google Scholar
  59. Spiro, R.J., Vispoel, W.P., Schmitz, J.G., Samarapungavan, A., Boerger, A.E. 1987Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domainsBritton, B.K.Glynn, S.M. eds. Executive Control Processes in ReadingLawrence ErlbaumHillsdale, N.J177199Google Scholar
  60. Tao, P.K., Gunstone, R.F. 1999Conceptual change in science through collaborative learning at the computerInternational Journal of Science Education213957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Vol 46). : SEGA Publication.Google Scholar
  62. Webb, N.M. 1989Peer interaction and learning in small groupsInternational Journal of Educational Research132139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Webb, N.M., Palincsar, A.S. 1996Group processes in the classroomBerliner, D.C.Cafree, R.C. eds. Handbook of Educational PsychologySimon & Schuster MacmillanNew York841873Google Scholar
  64. Wong, B.Y.L. 1985Self-questioning instructional research: A reviewReview of Educational Research55227268Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ikseon Choi
    • 1
  • Susan M. Land
    • 2
  • Alfred J. Turgeon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional TechnologyThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.The Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations