Abstract
This study examined how grouping arrangements affect students’ achievement, social interaction, and motivation. Students of high, average and low ability were randomly assigned to homogeneous or heterogeneous ability groups. All groups attended the same plant biology course. The main results indicate that low-ability students achieve more and are more motivated to learn in heterogeneous groups. Average-ability students perform better in homogeneous groups whereas high-ability students show equally strong learning outcomes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Results on social interaction indicate that heterogeneous groups produce higher proportions of individual elaborations, whereas homogeneous groups use relatively more collaborative elaborations. In the discussion, these differences in social interaction are used to explain the differential effects of grouping arrangements on achievement scores. Practical implications are discussed and topics for further research are advanced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Azmitia (1988) ArticleTitlePeer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one Child Development 59 87–96
W. Damon E. Phelps (1989) Strategic users of peer learning in children’s education T. Berndt G. Ladd (Eds) Peer Relationships in Child Development Wiley New York 13–157
L.S. Fuchs D. Fuchs C.L. Hamlett K. Karns (1998) ArticleTitleHigh-achieving students’ interactions and performance on complex mathematical tasks as a function of homogeneous and heterogeneous pairings American Educational Research Journal 35 227–267
S. Hooper M.J. Hannafin (1988) ArticleTitleCooperative CBI–The effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts Journal of Educational Computing Research 4 413–424
S. Hooper M.J. Hannafin (1991) ArticleTitleThe effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction Educational Technology Research and Development 39 27–40
S. Hooper T.J. Ward M.J. Hannafin H.T. Clark (1989) ArticleTitleThe effects of aptitude composition on achievement during small group learning Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 16 102–109
D.W. Johnson R.T. Johnson (1999) Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competetive, and Individualistic Learning Allyn & Bacon Boston
D.W. Johnson R.T. Johnson E. Holubec (1986) Revised Circle of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom Interaction Book Company Minnesota
A. King (1997) ArticleTitleAsk to THINK–TELL WHY®©: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning Educational Psychologist 32 221–236
Y. Lou P.C. Abrami J.C. Spence C. Poulson B. Chambers S. ‘d Apollonia (1996) ArticleTitleWithin-class grouping: A meta-analysis Review of Educational Research 66 423–458
S.M. McManus M. Gettinger (1996) ArticleTitleTeacher and student evaluations of cooperative learning and observed interactive behaviors Journal of Educational Research 90 13–22
R.E. Slavin (1990) Comprehensive cooperative learning models: embedding cooperative learning in the curriculum and the school S. Sharan (Eds) Cooperative Learning, Theory and Research Praeger New York 261–283
R.E. Slavin (1994) Student Teams-Achievement Divisions S. Sharan (Eds) Hand book of Cooperative Learning Methods Greenwood Westport 3–19
R.E. Slavin (1995) Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice Allyn Bacon Boston
C. Boxtel ParticleVan (2000) Collaborative concept learning: Collaborative learning tasks, student interaction and the learning of physics concepts Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands
N.M. Webb (1982) ArticleTitleGroup composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups Journal of Educational Psychology 74 475–484
N.M. Webb (1991) ArticleTitleTask-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22 366–389
N.M. Webb (1992) Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups R. Hertz-Lazarowitz N. Miller (Eds) Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning Cambridge University Press Cambridge 102–119
N.M. Webb G.P. Baxter L. Thompson (1997) ArticleTitleTeachers’ grouping practices in fifth-grade science classrooms The Elementary School Journal 98 91–113
N.M. Webb A.S. Palinscar (1996) Group processes in the classroom D.C. Berliner R.C. Calfee (Eds) Handbook of Educational Psychology MacMillan New York 841–873
A. Weinberger (2003) Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. University of Munich Munich, Germany
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saleh, M., Lazonder, A.W. & De Jong, T. Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instr Sci 33, 105–119 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-6405-z
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-6405-z