Skip to main content
Log in

Exploration of peer-facilitator dynamics in two contrasting groups

  • Published:
Instructional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing an integration of social-cognitivist and socio-cultural approaches, this study – comparing the interactive processes among peers and their mentor in two contrasting groups – was designed to explore the reasons why two learning groups, engaged in an inquiry-based learning project with comparatively sustained discussion, produced vastly differing results. Using discourse threads as the unit of analysis, together with the mentor's perceptions of group facilitation, the findings of this study highlighted the effect of group dynamics upon the mentor's facilitation. Group interaction with explicit and decisive discourse will result in a better understanding for the mentor of the group's zones of proximal development (different ZPDs), and will provide greater opportunity for effective group scaffolding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althauser, R. & Matuga, J. (1998). On the pedagogy of electronic instruction. In C.J. Bonk and K.S. King, eds, Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse pp. 183–208. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeli, C. & Cunningham, D.J. (1998). Bubble dialogue: tools for supporting literacy and mind. In C.J. Bonk and K.S. King, eds, Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, pp. 81–102. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Science 9(4): 403–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, Z.J., Hansen, E.J., Grabner-Hagen, M.M., Lazar, S.A. & Mirabelli, C. (1998). Time to “connect”: synchronous and asynchronous case-based dialogue among preservice teachers. In C.J. Bonk and K.S. King, eds, Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, pp. 289–314. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, C.J. & King, K.S. (1998). Computer conferencing and collaborative writing tools: starting a dialogue about student dialogue. In C.J. Bonk and K.S. King, eds, Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, pp. 3–24. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetina, K.K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., Siler, S.A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., Hausmann, R.G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science 25: 471–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, A.C., O'Donnell, M.A., & Jinks, T.S. (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. Journal of Experimental Education 69(1): 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W. (1984). Peer education: the untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 5: 331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallimore, R. & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society: teaching, schooling, and literate discourse. In L.C. Moll, ed, Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications of Socio-historical Psychology, pp. 175–205. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara, N., Bonk, C.J. & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science 28: 115–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L.M.(1993). Networlds: networks as a social space. In L.M. Harasim, ed, Global networks, pp. 15–34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A.R. Kaye, ed, Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing. The Najaden Papers, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B.K. & Pintrich, P.R.(1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relationship to learning. Review of Educational Research 67(1): 88–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D.W.L. (1999). Activity, apprenticeship, and epistemological appropriation: implications from the writings of Michael Polanyi. Educational Psychologist 34(4): 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed Learning. Guide for Learners and Teachers. Toronto, Canada: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B.K. & Clements, D.H. (1991). Research on cooperative learning: implications for practice. School Psychology Review 20(1): 110–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville, A.J. (1999). The problem-based learning tutor: teacher? Facilitator? Evaluator? Medical Teacher 21(4): 393–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1926). The Language and Thought of the Child. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development 15: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1964). Personal Knowledge: Towards A Post-critical Philosophy. NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudge, J.R.H. & Rogoff, B. (1989). Peer influence on cognitive development: Piagetian and Vygotskian perspectives. In M. Bornstein and J. Bruner, Eds, Interaction in Human Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudge, J.(1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: implications for classroom practice. In L.C. Moll, ed, Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications of Socio-historical Psychology, pp. 155–172. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudge, J. (2000). Theory, method, and analysis in research on the relations between peer collaboration and cognitive development. Journal of Experimental Education 69(1), 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meter, P. & Stevens, R.J. (2000). The role of theory in the study of peer collaboration. Journal of Experimental Education 69(1): 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on Vygotsky's legacy. In C.D. Lee and P. Smagorinsky, eds, Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research. Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei-ching Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Fc., Jiang, Hm. Exploration of peer-facilitator dynamics in two contrasting groups. Instructional Science 32, 419–446 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-2275-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-2275-7

Navigation