Abstract
Environmental enrichment consists of a way to provide better living conditions for animals, but its influence on physical integrity, thermoregulatory responses, and quality of pork meat is not known. The objective of this study was to evaluate the thermoregulatory responses, lesion score, lameness, carcass traits, and meat quality of pigs with and without access to environmental enrichment (EE) in the finishing phase. A total of 432 pigs of the Hampshire lineage, males and females, with average initial and final weights between 22–27 kg and 110–125 kg respectively were evaluated. The experimental design used was in randomized blocks, with 6 treatments, distributed in a 2×3 factorial scheme (sex × environmental enrichment), with 12 repetitions per treatment, totaling 72 stalls. The treatments were branched chain for males (T1), branched sisal rope for males (T2), males without EE (T3), branched chain for females (T4), branched sisal rope for females (T5), and females without EE (T6). Weekly, two assessments of physiological data were performed, in loco, in the morning and afternoon. Lesions on the tail, ear, body, and lameness were evaluated on the 1st, 16th, 37th, 51st, 79th, 93rd, and 112th days. On the 112th day, 72 animals were slaughtered for carcass traits and meat quality analyses. Statistical analysis was performed using generalized and mixed linear models. There was no effect (p>0.05) of the interaction of the studied factors (environmental enrichment × sex × period) on the head, back, leg, and average temperature. However, there was an effect of the period factor (p<0.01), with higher temperatures in the afternoon compared to the morning. For tail injury, there was no association between injury degree and gender (p=0.56) and between injury degree and enrichment (p=0.99), and there was no interaction effect (p=0.15). For ear injury, there was no association between the degree of ear injury and gender (p=0.72), as well as for the degree of ear injury and enrichment (p=0.99) and interaction (p=0.47). There was a higher occurrence of categories 2, 3, and 4 for lesions on the body in males (p=0.0257), regardless of the EE. Water retention, carcass yield, cut yield, marbling pattern, pH, and color showed no effect for sex, enrichment, and interaction between the two factors (p>0.05). The use of environmental enrichment with sisal ropes and branched chains does not change the thermophysical responses, carcass traits, and meat quality of finishing pig.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
Code availability
Not applicable
References
Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2ª ed. ed. [S.l.]. New York, 2002. 710
Bates, D.; Mäechler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J, Stat. Softw. 2015, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bertol, T.M. Estratégias nutricionais para melhoria da qualidade da carne suína. Teresinha Marisa Bertol/Editora técnica - Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2019. 296.
Bracke, M.B. M.; Koene, P. Expert opinion on metal chains and other indestructible objects as proper enrichment for intensively-farmed pigs. PLOS one. 2019, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212610
Brandt, P.; Aaslyng, M. D. Welfare measurements of finishing pigs on the day of slaughter: A review. Meat Sci. 2015, 103, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.12.004
Brasil Instrução Normativa n° 113, 2020. Estabelecer as boas práticas de manejo e bem-estar animal nas granjas de suínos de criação comercial. Diário Oficial [da] União, Brasília, DF. Publicado em 18 de dezembro de 2020, Edição 242, Seção 1, p. 5
Casal, N.; Font-i-Furnols, M.; Gispert, M.; Manteca, X.; Fàbrega, E. Effect of environmental enrichment and herbal compounds-supplemented diet on pig carcass, meat quality traits, and consumers’ acceptability and preference. Animals. 2018, 8, 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8070118
Chou, J.; Drique, C. M. V.; Sandercock, D. A.; D’Eath, R. B.; O’Driscoll K. Rearing undocked pigs on fully slatted floors using multiple types and variations of enrichment. Animals. 2019, 9, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040139
Christensen, R.H. Analysis of ordinal data with cumulative link models estimation with the R-package ordinal (2011). Disponível em: http://www.R-project.org
Ciborowska, P.; Michalczuk, M. Bien, D. The effect of music on livestock: cattle, poultry and pigs. Animals. 2021, 11, 3572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123572
Čobanović, N.; Bošković, M.; Vasilev, D.; Dimitrijević, M.; Parunović, N.; Djordjević, J.; Karabasil, N. Effects of various pre-slaughter conditions on pig carcasses and meat quality in a low-input slaughter facility. S. Afr. J. Anim. 2016, 46, 380-390. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v46i4.6
Conselho da União Europeia. Diretiva 2008/120/CE, relativa às normas mínimas de proteção de suínos, 2008. Disponível em: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/PT/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008L0120 (accessed 21 April 2022)
Dalla Costa, F.A., Dalla Costa, O.A., Coldebella, A., Lima G.J.M.M., Ferraudo, A.S. How do season, on-farm fasting interval and lairage period affect swine welfare, carcass and meat quality traits?. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2018, 63, 1497–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1527-1
Dalla Costa, F.A.; Lopes, L.; Dalla Costa, O.A. Effects of the truck suspension system on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality traits in pigs. Animals. 2017, 7, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7010005
Dalla Costa, O.A.; Dalla Costa, F.A.; Feddern, V.; Lopes, L. S.; Coldebella, A.; Gregory, N.G.; Lima, G.J.M.M. Risk factors associated with pig pre-slaughtering losses. Meat Sci. 2019, 155, 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.04.020
Deen, J.; Schuttert, M.; van Amstel, S.; Ossent, P.; van Barneveld, R.; Stalder, K. Feet First: Swine Lesion Scoring Guide. Zinpro Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 2009
Driessen, B.; Beirendonck, S.V.; Buyse, J. The Impact of Grouping on Skin Lesions and Meat Quality of Pig Carcasses. Animals. 2020, 10, 544. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040544
Dušanka, J.; Gorjanc, G.; Štuhec, I.; Žgur, S. Improvement of pork characteristics under commercial conditions with small amount of straw or hay. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2018, 46, 1317-1322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1503963
European Union Council. Diretiva 2008/120/CE, relativa às normas mínimas de proteção de suínos, de 18 de dezembro, 2008. Disponível em: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008L0120. Accessed 20 Jul 2022
Fàbrega, E., Marcet-Rius, M., Vidal, R., Escribano, D., Cerón, J.J., Manteca, X. and Velarde, A. The effects of environmental enrichment on the physiology, behaviour, productivity and meat quality of pigs raised in a hot climate. Animals. 2019, 9, 235. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9050235
Foppa, L., Pierozan, C.R., Caldas, E.D., Michelon, A. Enriquecimento ambiental em suinocultura. In: Suinocultura: uma saúde e um bem-estar. 1st ed.; Ribas, J.C.R.; Dias, C.P.; Ludtke, C.B.; Buss, L.P., Eds.; Secretaria de Inovação, Desenvolvimento Rural e Irrigação. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. – Brasília: AECS, 2020; pp. 227-245
Foppa, L.; Caldara, F.R.; Moura, R.; Machado, S.P.; Nääs, I.A.; Garcia, R.G.; Gonçalves, L.M.P.; Oliveira, G.F. Pig’s behavioral response in nursery and growth phases to environmental enrichment objects. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2018, 16, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2018163-12303
Godyn. D.; Nowicki, J.; Herbut, P. Effects of environmental enrichment on pig welfare - a review. Animals, 2019, 9, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060383
Grandin, T. On-farm conditions that compromise animal welfare that can be monitored at the slaughter plant. Meat Sci. 2017, 132, 52-58.
Guimarães, D.; Amaral, G.; Maia, G.; Lemos, M.; Ito, M.; Custodio, S. Suinocultura: estrutura da cadeia produtiva, panorama do setor no brasil e no mundo e o apoio do BNDES. Agroindústria. 2017. 45. 85-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.05.004
Lahrmann, H.P.; Hansen, C.F.; D’Eath, R.B.; Busch, M.E.; Nielsen, J.P.; Forkman, B. Early intervention with enrichment can prevent tail biting outbreaks in weaner pigs. Livest. Sci. 2018, 214, 272-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.06.010
Liu, R.; Li, K.; Wu, G.; Qin, M.; Yu, H.; Wu, M.; Ge, Q.; Wu, S.; Bao, W.; Zhang, W. A comparative study of S-nitrosylated myofibrillar proteins between red, firm and non- exudative (RFN) and pale, soft and exudative (PSE) pork by iodoTMT-based proteomics assay. Food Chem. 2022, 395, 133577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133577
Ludke, C.; Peloso, J.V.; Dalla Costa, O.A.; Rohr, S.; Dalla Costa, F.A. Bem-estar animal na produção de suínos. Da recepção no frigorífico até o abate com garantia de qualidade. Associação Brasileira dos Criadores de Suinos: ABCS. 2016. 46
McCullagh, P. Regression Methods for Ordinal Data. J. R. Statistic. Soc. B 1980, 42, 109-142
Mkwanazi, M.V.; Ncobela, C.N.; Kanengoni, A.T.; Chimonyo, M. Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour, physiology and performance of pigs — A review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2019, 32, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0138
Nascimento AP A. d, Martins Castro MS, de Sousa Oliveira D, Freitas Silveira RM, Ortiz Vega WH, Medeiros Nobre ME, Andrioli A, Maria de Vasconcelos A. Environmental enrichment in dairy goats in a semi-arid region: Thermoregulatory and behavioral responses. J Therm Biol. 2022 May;106:103248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103248
National Pork Board. 2022 Disponível em: https://americanporkclub.com/Home/production/practical-materials/pork-quality- standards (accessed 21 April 2022).
NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th edn. Washington (DC): National Academies Press. 2012
OIE (Organização Mundial para Saúde Animal). Terrestrial Animal Health Code. 2021. Disponível em. http://www.oie.int/animal-welfare/animal-welfare-key-themes/. Accessed 23 March 2021
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2020. Disponível em. https://www.R-project.org/
Santos, J.V.; Farias, S.S.; Pereira, T.L.; Teixeira, C.P.C.; Titto, C.G. Preference for and maintenance of interest in suspended enrichment toys in confined growing pigs. J. Vet. Behav. 2021, 45, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2021.07.005
Tarczyński, K.; Zybert, A.; Sieczkowska, H.; Krzęcio-Nieczyporuk, E.; Antosik, K. Classification accuracy of different pork quality evaluation methods in assessment of meat with lowered drip loss. Cienc. Rural. 2021, 5, 10. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20200885
Tavares, M.C.M.S., Silva, I.J.O., Alessandra, A. et al. Evaluation of environmental enrichment on productive and behavioral responses of finishing pigs. Trop Anim Health Prod 55, 157 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03565-9
Théron, L.; Sayd, T.; Chambon, C.; Vénien, A.; Viala, D.; Astruc, T.; Vautier, A.; Santé- Lhoutellier, V. Deciphering PSE-like muscle defect in cooked hams: A signature from the tissue to the molecular scale. Food Chem. 2019, 270, 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.081
Verbeke, G. The Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM). In Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, NY, 2005.
Vitali, M.; Nannoni, E.; Sardi, L.; Bassi, P.; Militerno, G.; Faucitano, L.; Bonaldo, A.; Martelli, G. Enrichment tools for undocked heavy pigs: effects on body and gastric lesions and carcase and meat quality parameters. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2018.1472530
Werner D, Baldinger L, Bussemas R, Büttner S, Weißmann F, Ciulu M, Mörlein J, Mörlein D. Early Immunocastration of Pigs: From Farming to Meat Quality. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(2):298. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020298. PMID: 33503873; PMCID: PMC7912067.
Zequan, X.; Yonggang, S.; Guangjuan, L.; Shijun, X.; Li, Z.; Mingrui, Z.; Yanli, X.; Zirong, W. Proteomics analysis as an approach to understand the formation of pale, soft, and exudative (PSE) pork. Meat Science, v. 177, p. 108353, 2021
Zhen, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; G., K.; Chen, H.; LI, C.; Ren, F. Effects of lairage time on welfare indicators, energy metabolism and meat quality of pigs in Beijing. Meat Science. 2013, 93, 287–291
Acknowledgements
The authors of this study gratefully acknowledge all technical professionals who contributed to this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, M.T and I.S. (Mariana Tavares and Iran Silva); methodology, M.T. and I.S.; software, I.D.; S. F and M.S. (Idemauro de Lara, Silvia Freitas and Maria Salvador); validation, I.S.; formal analysis, I.D.; S. F and M.S.; investigation, A.A. (Alessandra Arno); resources, M.T.; Data curation, I.D.; S. F and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.; writing—review and editing, R.S (Robson Silveira) M.T. and I.S.; supervision, I.S.; project administration, M.T.
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The animal study was carried out according to the recommendations of protocol number 2019-07 under the responsibility of Iran José de Oliveira, approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (CEUA), College of Agriculture “Luiz de Queiroz”, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil, University of São Paulo. In accordance with Law No. 11,794/2008, and with the rules issued by the National Council for the Control of Animal Experi-mentation – CONCEA.
Consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Informed consent
Not applicable for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tavares, M.C.M.S., Arno, A., Silveira, R.M.F. et al. Evaluation of environmental enrichment on thermophysical responses, carcass traits, and meat quality of finishing pigs. Trop Anim Health Prod 55, 235 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03634-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-023-03634-z