Skip to main content
Log in

Carcass and meat quality of young Angus steers with different growth potential finished exclusively grass-fed or corn supplemented

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Beef cattle production has a large variety of systems with different performance and technology levels. This study compared young Angus steers carcass and meat quality traits of high growth potential early-finished animals fed exclusively on pasture with low growth potential late-finished animals. Besides the grazed forage, the low growth potential group received corn grain at 0.8% of their body weight right after the slaughtering of the first group. Following weaning, the 20 steers grazed pastures composed of oat, ryegrass, and clovers. At winter’s onset, animals were moved to native pastures improved with fescue and clovers. The supplemented period of late steers began when the first group of ten early-finished animals reached the requirements for slaughter. Supplementation ended when the animals got the slaughter requirements. The high growth potential steers showed a ribeye area (P < 0.0001) and a Longissimus muscle width highly significantly (P < 0.0001) superior to the low growth group. However, corn-supplemented animals showed better dressing percentage (P < 0.0001), subcutaneous fat thickness (P < 0.0001), marbling (P < 0.0001), and muscle (P = 0.0033) scores, but lower shear force (P = 0.0001). The finishing system did impact fat lightness (L*; P = 0.0234) at the slaughter time. Grass-fed animals showed higher red-green color parameter (a*) values than corn supplemented on fat at 24 h (P = 0.0439) but lower hue angle (P = 0.0418). The consumer panel showed better results for tenderness and general acceptability for supplemented animals beef compared to grass-fed. The supplementation resulted in a higher carcass standardization. It also provided higher PUFA: MUFA and n-6: n-3 ratios, and a higher amount of n-3. Supplemental corn grain did not have adverse effects upon the beneficial effects to human health of the grass-fed beef.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

This requirement is not applicable to the study.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fazenda Buffalo; the Santa Catarina State University; and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES) [Finance Code 001].

Funding

This work was supported by the Fazenda Buffalo; the Santa Catarina State University; and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES) [Finance Code 001].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IASJ designed the research, conducted the experiment and all analyses, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. HLL, KAM, and MRS conducted and assisted the analyses. AZ analyzed the data. DCC and AZ mentored the experiment and designed the research. We declare that all the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. A. Santin Jr.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The Animal Ethics Committee (CEUA-UDESC nº 5460090817) and the Human Research Ethics Committee (CEPSH-UDESC nº 2.380.738) approved the project and proceedings. In addition, the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

The authors affirm that the identifying information of all the human research participants is not being published.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santin Jr, I.A., Lima, H.L., Mateus, K.A. et al. Carcass and meat quality of young Angus steers with different growth potential finished exclusively grass-fed or corn supplemented. Trop Anim Health Prod 53, 521 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02965-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02965-z

Keywords

Navigation