Abstract
This work evaluated the digestibility of the experimental diets, the performance and the economic viability of pigs in the finishing phase fed with diets containing increasing levels of cottonseed meal (CM) with enzymatic complex. In the digestibility test, 35 barrows with an average weight of 54.54 ± 2.49 kg were used and for the performance and economic viability test, 30 pigs with an average weight of 55.47 ± 5.3 kg were used. In both trials, the animals were distributed in five diets: control diet (0), control diet plus the enzyme complex (0E), diet with 5% CM plus the enzyme complex (5E), diet with 10% CM plus the enzyme complex (10E), and a diet with 15% CM plus the enzyme complex (15E). The digestibility coefficients of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and crude protein (CP) reduced with the inclusion of CM with enzyme complex in the diet of pigs in the finishing phase, in contrast to the ether extract (EE), which improved as the inclusion of CM increased. No statistical difference (P > 0.05) was found in the performance when all diets were compared; however, when comparing only the diets that contained the enzyme complex separately, a negative linear effect (P = 0.015) was observed for the feed conversion (FC) in period 2. The diets have no effects on periods 1 and 3. Diets 0, 5E, 10E, and 15E, presented better net income (P = 0.019) in March to May 2018 due to the different levels of inclusion of CM with enzyme complex; in the other evaluated items, there were no statistical differences (P > 0.05). The inclusion of CM and enzyme complex in the diets reduced the digestibility of the dietary components; however, it did not reflect on the performance and was not financially viable in the studied scenario.


Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Acrismat. Cotações Mato Grosso. 2018. http://acrismat.com.br/acrismat-site/cotacoes-mato-grosso. Acesso em 18 dez 2018.
Amorim, A.B., Thomaz, M.C., Ruiz, U.S., Pascoal, L.A.F., Watanabe, P.H., Martinez, J.F., Daniel, E., Martins, M.I.E. G. Masson, G.C.I.H. 2011. Avaliação econômica da utilização de diferentes níveis de polpa cítrica com ou sem adição de complexo enzimático nas dietas de suínos. Arquivo Brasileiro de medicina veterinária e Zootecnia, 63(5), 1181-1190.
AOAC-American Association of Cereal Chemists. 2010. Official methods of analysis, 17th edn. Gaithersburg, MD: The Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
Balogun, T.F., Aduku, A.O., Dim, N.I., Olorunju, S.A.S. 1990.Undecorticated cottonseed meal as a substitute for soya bean meal in diets for weaner and growing-finishing pigs. Animal Feed Science andTechnology, 30, 193-201.
Bedford, M. R. (2000). Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition — their current value and future benefits. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 86(1-2), 1-13.
Bedford, M.R. and H. Schulze, 1998. Exogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry. Nutrition Research Reviews,11, 91-114.
Blevins, S., Siegel, P.B., Blodgett, D.J., Ehrich, M., Saunders, G.K., Lewis, R.M. 2010. Effects of silymarin on gossypol toxicosis in divergent lines of chickens. Poultry Science, 89(9), 1878-1886.
Fischer, G. Maier, J.C. Rutz, F. Bermudez, V. L. 2002. Desempenho de Frangos de Corte Alimentados com Dietas à Base de Milho e Farelo de Soja, com ou sem Adição de Enzimas. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 31(1), 402.
Gadelha, I.C.N., Rangel, A.H.N., Silva, A.R., Soto-blanco, B. 2011. Efeitos do gossipol na reprodução animal. Acta Veterinária Brasilica, 5(2), 129-135.
Hauschild, M.Z., Huijbregts, M., Jolliet, O., MacLeod, M., Margni, M., Van de Meent, D., Rosenbaum, R.K., McKone, T.E. 2008. Building a model based on scientific consensus for life cycle impact assessment of chemicals: The search for harmony and parsimony. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 7032-7037.
Kamga, R., Kayem, G. J. Rouxhet, P.G. 2000. Adsorption of gossypol from cottonseed oil on oxides. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 232, 198-206.
Kornegay, E. d., Clawson, A.J., Smith, F.H., Barrick, E.R. 1961. Influence of protein source on toxicity of gossypol in swine rations. Journal of Animal Sciences, 20(3), 597-602.
Lana, R. P. 2000. Sistema Viçosa de formulação de rações. Viçosa: UFV, p.60.
Li, D., Xu, X.X., Qiao, S.Y., Zheng, C.T., Chen, Y., Piao, X.S., Han, I.K., Thacker, P. 2000. Growth performance of growing-finishing pigs fed diets supplemented with Chinese cottonseed meal based on amino acids digestibilities. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 13(4), 521- 527.
Lima, M.R., Silva, J.H.V., Araujo, J.A., Lima, C.B., Oliveira, E.R.A. 2007. Enzimas exógenas na alimentação de aves. Acta VeterinariaBrasilica, 1(4), 99-110.
Liu, C.Y.,Liu, Y.G., Mori, Y.A. 2010. Enzimas NSP melhora o desempenho e diminui custos de alimentação de suínos nas fases de crescimento e terminação. In. Enzima NSP suínos. Engormix. 2010. http://pt.engormix.com/MA-suinocultura/nutricao/artigos/enzima-nsp-em-alimentacao-de-suinos-nas-fases-de-crescimento-e-terminacao-t297/141-p0.htm. Acesso em 19 de fevereiro de 2019.
Ma, D.L., Ma, X.K., Liu, L., & Zhang, S. 2018. Chemical composition, energy, and amino acid digestibility in 7 cottonseed co-products fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 96(4), 1338–1349.
Ma, X., Hu, J., Shang, Q., Liu, H., Piao, S. 2019. Chemical composition, energy content and amino acid digestibility in cottonseed meals fed to growing pigs. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 47(1), 280-288.
Medel, P., Baucells, F., Gracia, M.I., Blas, C., Mateos, G.G. 2002. Processing of barley and enzyme supplementation in diets for young pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 95, 113-122.
Mello, G., Laurentiz, A.C., Filardi, R.S., Bergamaschine, A.F., Okuda, H.T., Lima, M.M., Junqueira, O.M. 2012. Farelo de algodão em rações para suínos nas fases de crescimento e terminação. Archivos de Zootecnia, 61(233), 55-62.
Moreira, I., Sartori, I.M., Paiano, D., Martins, R.M., Oliveira, G. C. 2006. Utilização do farelo de algodão, com ou sem a adição de ferro, na alimentação de leitões na fase inicial (15–30 kg). Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 35(3), 1077-1084.
Nascimento, C.L.M.M, Dutra júnior, W.M., Rabello, C.B.V., Mohaupt, M.C., Ludke, M., Palhares, L.O., Nascimento, G.R., Silva, E.C. 2018. Valor nutritivo do farelo de algodão para suínos em crescimento. Revista Científica de produção animal, 20(1), 7-10.
Nascimento, C.L.M.M, Dutra júnior, W.M., Rabello, C. B. V., do Ludke, M. C. M. M., Nascimento, G. R., Palhares, L. O. 2020. Desempenho e características de carcaças de fêmeas suínas alimentadas com farelo de algodão. Arquivos de Ciências Veterinárias e Zoologia da UNIPAR, 23(1), 1-6.
Paiano, D.; Moreira, I.; Furlan, A.C.; Silva, M.A.A.; Hideo, J. H.; Patricio, V. M. I. 2003. Utilização do farelo de algodão para suínos em crescimento. In: XI Congresso Brasileiro de Veterinários Especialistas em Suínos, Anais... Goiânia.
Paiano, D., Moreira, I., Carvalho, P.L.O., Furlan, A.C., Silva, M.A.A., Kutschenko, M., Voorsluys, T. 2014. Farelo de algodão na alimentação de suínos (30 – 90 kg). Revista Brasileira de Saúde Produção Animal, 15(3), 790-800.
Palhares, L.O. Utilização da torta de algodão com ou sem enzimas para suínos em crescimento. 2014. Dissertação de Mestrado não publicada, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
Pekas, J.C. Versatile swine laboratory apparatus for physiologic and 19 metabolic studies. 1968. Journal of Animal Science, 27(5), 1303-1309.
Pimentel, A.C.S., Dutra Junior, W.M., Ludke, M.C. M.M., Ludke, J.V., Rabello, C.B.V., Freitas, C.R.G. 2007. Substituição parcial do milho e farelo de soja por sogo e farelo de caroço de algodão extrusado em rações de frango de corte. Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences, 29(2), 135-141.
Rezende, I.M.B.L., Dutra Junior, W.M., Rezende, F.M.; Palhares, L.O., Ludke, M.C.M.M., Rabêlo, C.B.V. 2012. Digestibility of the cottonseed meal with or without addition of protease and phytase enzymes in swine diet. Acta scientiarum Animal Sciences, 34(3), 259-265.
Rostagno, H.S., Albino, L.F.T., Hannas, M.I., Donzele, J.L., Sakomura, N.K., Perazzo, F.G., Saraiva, A. Teixeira, M.L., Rodrigues, P.B., Oliveira, R.F., Barreto, S.L. T., Brito, C.O. 2017. Tabelas brasileiras de aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. 4. Ed. Departamento de Zootecnia, Viçosa.
Ruiz, U.S., Thomaz, M.C., Hannas, M.I., Fraga, A.L., Watanabe, P.H., Silva, S.Z. 2008. Complexo enzimático para suínos: digestão, metabolismo, desempenho e impacto ambiental. RevistaBrasileira de Zootecnia, 37(3),458-468.
Silva, J.R., Pereira N.T., Andrade, R.V., Cabral, M.V.A., Corassa, A., Sbardella, M., Lima, H.J.D., Arantes, V.M., Martinez, J.F., Santos, A.L., Amorim, A.B. 2020. Nutritional valueof cottonseed meal for swine in the finishing phase. Scientific Electronic Archives, 13(3), 1-5.
Stuani, J.L., Corassa, A., Silva, I.P.A. 2016. Caracterização Nutricional e uso de DDGS para suínos em crescimento e terminação - Abordagem analítica. Nativa, 4(2), 116-120.
Swiatkiewicz, S., Arczewska Wlosek, A., Jozefiak, D. 2016. The use of cottonseed meal as a protein source for poultry: an updated review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 72(3), 473-484.
Tejedor, A.A., Albino, L. F. T. Rostagno, H.S., Lima, C.A.R., Vieites, F.M. 2001. Efeito da adição de enzimas em dietas e frangos de corte à base de milho e faelo de soja sobre a digestibilidade ileal de nutrientes. RevistaBrasileira de Zootecnia,39, 151-165.
Vanderhoof, J.A. 1998. Immunonutrition: the role of carbohydrates. Nutrition Research, 14(7-8), 595-598.
Willamil, J., Badiola, I., Devillard, E., Geraert, P.A., Torrallardona, D. 2012. Wheat-barley-rye- or corn-fed growing pigs respond differently to dietary supplementation with a carbohydrase complex. Journal Animal Science, 90(3), 824-832.
Yu, F., Moughant, P.J., Barry, T.N., & McNabb, W.C. 1996. The effect of condensed tannins from heated and unheated cottonseed on the ileal digestibility of amino acids for the growing rat and pig. British Journal of Nutrition, 76(03), 359-371.
Zhang, W., Li, D., Liu, L., Zang, J., Duan, Q., Yang, W., Zhang, L. 2013. The effects of dietary fiber level on nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. Journalof Animal Science andBiotechnology, 4(1), 1-7.
Acknowledgements
To the Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences for the opportunity to attend postgraduate studies in animal science
To Research Support Foundation of the State of Mato Grosso for granting the Master’s scholarship.
To the National Council of Scientific and Technological Research for financing the research.
To the Federal University of Rondonópolis for making their laboratories available for the execution and analysis of the research.
To the company Adisseo Nutrição Animal LTDA, for supplying the enzyme complex used in the research.
Data and materials availability
The authors declare that the research data and materials are available for verification, following the ethical standards of data transparency.
Code availability
Software sas student was used, available and free on the website.
Funding
The Research grant was from financed bay the Research Support Foundation of the State of Mato Grosso (FAPEMAT), Notice Capes/FAPEMAT no 0,41/20116.
The research was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, no. 458748/2014-5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Statement of Animal Rights
The experimental procedures used in the study were approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (ECUA), from the Federal University of Mato Grosso, protocol n° 2310108.327837/2017-57.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Silva, J.R., de Andrade, R.V., Corassa, A. et al. Cottonseed meal with enzyme complex for finishing pigs. Trop Anim Health Prod 53, 306 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02762-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02762-8

