Risk factors of brucellosis (re-)incidence in sheep and goat flocks in an endemic area of Portugal

Abstract

This study aimed to determinate the main risk factors of brucellosis recurrence or highest animal incidence in flocks, under pastoralism, in an endemic area of Northeast Portugal. An epidemiological survey was performed on 25 recurrent (n = 18) or highest seropositive (n = 7) sheep and mixed goat flocks and 19 historical (≥ 10 years) brucellosis-free flock, between 2014 and 2017, within the same epidemiological area presenting an average annual incidence around 6%. According to the multivariable logistic model (P < 0.001), the lack of neighboring brucellosis-free flocks (odds ratio OR = 7.79; CI % 1.49–65.06), the occurrence of more than 50% of lambing or kidding in common paths and pastures (OR = 24.17; CI % 3.0–606.54), and the animal replacement with Rev.1 non-vaccinated young animals (OR = 18.47; CI % 2.54–408.21) were the causes that influence the recurrence and highest animal incidence in flocks. In extensive production systems, the confinement of the peri-parturient and the small ruminant replacement with Rev.1 vaccinated young females seems to play a major role on brucellosis control and eradication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bamaiyi, P.H., Hassan, L., Khairani-Bejo, S., ZainalAbidin, M., Ramlan, M., Krishnan, N., Adzhar, A., Abdullah, N., Hamidah, N.H., Norsuhanna, M.M., Hashim, S.N., 2014. Case-control study on risk factors associated with Brucella melitensis in goat farms in Peninsular Malaysia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 46(5):739–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Battistini M.L., Giovannini A., Tamba M., Caporale V., 1997. Application of a geographical information system to the epidemiological surveillance of notifiable diseases. Proceedings of the VIII° ISVEE, Paris, 1997. Epidémiologie Santé Animale, 31–32: 12.C.46.

  3. Blasco JM, Molina-Flores B (2011) Control and eradication of Brucella melitensis infection in sheep and goats. Vet Clin N Am Food Anim Pract 27:95–104

  4. Coelho, A.M., Coelho, A.C., Roboredo, M. and Rodrigues, J., 2007. A case-control study of risk factors for brucellosis seropositivity in Portuguese small ruminants herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 82(3–4):291–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coelho, A.M., Pinto, M. L., García Díez, J. and Coelho, A.C., 2015. Impact of B. melitensis Rev-1 vaccination on Brucellosis prevalence. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 39:261–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DGAV, 2016. Annex I.b: Programme for the eradication of bovine Tuberculosis, bovine Brucellosis or sheep and goat Brucellosis (B. melitensis) submitted for obtaining EU cofinancing. Available at: http://www.dgv.min-agricultura.pt, retrieved 21-3-2018.

  7. Goodwin, Z.I. and Pascual, D.W., 2016. Brucellosis vaccines for livestock. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 181:51–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hosmer, D.W. and Lemeshow, S., 1989. Applied logistic regression. New York, USA: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  9. Musallam I.I., Abo-Shehada, M., Omar, M. and Guitian, J., 2015. Cross-sectional study of brucellosis in Jordan: Prevalence, risk factors and spatial distribution in small ruminants and cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 118(4):387–396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oseguera Montiel, D., Frankena K., Udo H., Keilbach Baer N.M. and van der Zijpp, A., 2013. Prevalence and risk factors for brucellosis in goats in areas of Mexico with and without brucellosis control campaign. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45(6):1383–1389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reviriego, F.J., Moreno, M.A. and Domínguez, L., 2000. Risk factors for brucellosis seroprevalence of sheep and goat flocks in Spain. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 44(3–4):167–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossetti, C.A., Arenas-Gamboa, A.M. and Maurizio, E., 2017. Caprine brucellosis: A historically neglected disease with significant impact on public health. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 11(8):e0005692. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005692

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. SAS Institute Inc., 2013. Using JMP 11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc Cary.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Te-Chaniyom T., Geater, A.F., Kongkaew, W., Chethanond, U., Chongsuvivatwong, V., 2016. Goat farm management and Brucella serological test among goat keepers and livestock officers, 2011–2012, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, southern Thailand. One Health, 2:126–130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Thrusfield, M., 2005. Veterinary Epidemiology, 2nd Edition, (Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Humberto Tavares, the supervisor veterinarian of the Livestock Producers Organization at Vinhais (Portugal), for the full access to data and flocks.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Simões.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castelo, C., Simões, J. Risk factors of brucellosis (re-)incidence in sheep and goat flocks in an endemic area of Portugal. Trop Anim Health Prod 51, 487–490 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1706-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Brucella melitensis
  • Epidemiological survey
  • Rev.1 vaccination
  • Small ruminants