Advertisement

Challenges for local breed management in Mediterranean dairy sheep farming: insights from Central Greece

  • Lola Perucho
  • Ioannis Hadjigeorgiou
  • Anne Lauvie
  • Charles-Henri Moulin
  • Jean-Christophe Paoli
  • Christina Ligda
Regular Articles
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

Local breeds are recognized as an important element for the maintenance of various and specific farming systems. Challenges for local breeds’ management, in a context of crossbreeding with exotic highly productive breeds, have been mainly studied in tropical countries. However, similar situation and challenges are likely to exist in Mediterranean countries subjected to climatic and feed scarcity issues. The objective of this work is to identify the challenges for local breed management in a regional context of informal crossbreeding with highly productive breeds. For this purpose, the case of dairy sheep farming in the region of Thessaly, in Central Greece, was examined. Semi-structured interviews were performed in 46 farms and processed through hierarchical classification on principal components. A follow-up on seven farms raising the Karagouniko sheep breed, the main local breed of the region, was carried on during one milk campaign. Results showed that a diversity of breeding strategies involving local purebred and crossbred flocks coexist in the region. The Karagouniko breed is facing several challenges. The supply in exotic breeding males and their crosses could be wide-scaled and involved a diversity of operators, whereas the supply in breeding males of Karagouniko breed was restrained to between-farm supply among flocks under milk recording scheme. In addition, the heterogeneity of access and quality of collective rangelands affected the farming of Karagouniko breed ewes, whose purebred flocks were significantly associated with the grazing on native grasslands. Finally, unfavorable dairies’ policies led Karagouniko farmers to seek higher flock milk production through levers that could impact the vulnerability of the farm, such as earlier lambing period or earlier weaning age. Farmers also questioned the use of highly productive breeds as a potential lever to reach higher flock milk production.

Keywords

Breeding practices Animal genetic resources Crossbreeding Grazing Karagouniko sheep 

Abbreviations

BS

Breeding strategies

HCPC

Hierarchical classification in principal components

LGRC

Livestock Genetic Resources Centre

ESRI

Environment Systems Research Institute

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Livestock Genetic Resources Centre of Karditsa and the Breeders Associations of Thessaly for providing data and farmers’ contacts and the individual farmers that participated in the interviews.

Funding information

This work was partially funded by the Domestic and Perform projects (supported by ARIMNET, ERA-Net funded by the European Union), the Corsican regional research funding scheme (CPER), and the Department of Nutrition Physiology and Feeding of the Agricultural University of Athens.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11250_2018_1688_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (417 kb)
Online Resource 1 (PDF 417 kb)

References

  1. Belibasaki, S., Sossidou, E., Gavojdian, D., 2012. Local Breeds: Can they be a Competitive Solution for Regional Development in the World of “Globalization”? The Cases of Greek and Romanian local breeds, Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 45, 278–284Google Scholar
  2. Bett, R.C., Kosgey, I.S., Kahi, A.K., Peters, K.J., 2009. Analysis of production objectives and breeding practices of dairy goats in Kenya, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41, 307–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyazoglu, J., Hatziminaoglou, Y., 2005. Livestock genetic resources and production systems: a mediterranean overview, Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, 10Google Scholar
  4. Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2015. ArcGis software version 10.3.1, Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc, Redlands, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. FAO, 2015. Coping with climate change. The roles of genetic resources. FAO, Rome, Italy. Report of the FAO/WAAP Workshop. 110 p.Google Scholar
  6. FAO/WAAP, 2008. Production Environment Descriptors for Animal Genetic Resources. FAO, Caprarola, Italy. Report of the FAO/WAAP Workshop. 97 p.Google Scholar
  7. Gandini, G., Avon, L., Bohte-Wilhelmus, D., Bay, E., Colinet, F.G., Choroszy, Z., et al. 2010. Motives and values in farming local cattle breeds in Europe: a survey on 15 breeds, Animal Genetic Resources, 47, 45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Georgoudis, A., Hatziminaoglou I., Pappas V., 1995. The breeding scheme of the Karagouniko sheep in Greece. In: Gabiña D. (ed.). Strategies for sheep and goat breeding, Zaragoza: CIHEAM, 1995, (Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, 11), 61-65 http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?IDPDF=96605542
  9. Gomes Arandas, J.K., Chaves Alves, A.G., Faco, O., Belchior, E.B., Shiotsuki, L., de Arruda Leite, P.M.B., Ribeiro, M.N., 2017. Do traditional sheep breeders perform conscious selection? An example from a participatory breeding program of Morada Nova sheep, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 49, 1479–1487Google Scholar
  10. Hadjigeorgiou, I., 2011. Past, present and future of pastoralism in Greece, Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 1,  https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-7136-1-24
  11. Hatziminaoglou, I., 2001. Sheep and goats in Greece and in the world, (Giachoudi ed., Thessaloniki) (in Greek) Google Scholar
  12. Lauvie, A., Paoli, J.C., Moulin, C.H., 2015. Managing local breeds: a dynamic connected to livestock farming systems that concerns different levels of organization, Animal Genetic Resources, 56, 119–125  https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633614000502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ligda, C., Casabianca, F., 2013. Adding value to local breeds: challenges, strategies and key factors, Animal Genetic Resources, 53, 107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ligda, C., Altarayrah, J., Georgoudis, A., the ECONOGENE consortium, 2009. Genetic analysis of Greek sheep breeds using microsatellite markers for setting conservation priorities, Small Ruminant Research, 83, 42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin-Collado, D., Byrne, T.J., Amer, P.R., Santos, B.F.S., Axford, M., Pryce, J.E., 2015. Analyzing the heterogeneity of farmers’ preferences for improvements in dairy cow traits using farmer typologies, Journal of Dairy Science, 98, 4148–4161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nauta, W.J., Baars, T., Saatkamp, H., Weenink, D., Roep, D., 2009. Farming strategies in organic dairy farming: Effects on breeding goal and choice of breed. An explorative study, Livestock Science, 121, 187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Perucho, L., Bazin, G., Goussios, D., 2015. Crise économique grecque et nouvelles dynamiques agraires: l’exemple de la Thessalie orientale, Annales de géographie, 705, 473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Porqueddu, C., Melis, R.A.M., Franca, A., Sanna, F., Hadjigeorgiou, I., Casasus I., 2017. The role of grasslands in the less favoured areas of Mediterranean Europe. In: C. Porqueddu et al. (eds), Grassland resources for extensive farming systems in marginal lands: major drivers and future scenarios, Alghero, 2017, (Grassland Science in Europe, 22), 3-22.Google Scholar
  19. R Development Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
  20. Ragkos, A., Abas, Z., 2015. Using the choice experiment method in the design of breeding goals in dairy sheep, Animal, 9, 208–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sivignon, M., 1975. La Thessalie: analyse géographique d’une province grecque, (Institut des Etudes Rhodaniennes, Lyon)Google Scholar
  22. Varela, E. and Robles-Cruz, A.B., 2016. Ecosystem services and socio-economic benefits of Mediterranean grasslands. In: A. Kyriazopoulos et al. (eds), Ecosystem services and socio-economic benefits of Mediterranean grasslands, Zaragoza: CIHEAM, 2016, (Options Méditerranéennes, Serie A: Mediterranean Seminars, 114), 13-27 http://om.ciheam.org/om/pdf/a114/00007476.pdf
  23. Wurzinger, M., Ndumu, D., Baumung, R., Drucker, A., Okeyo, A.M., Semambo, D.K., Byamungu, N., Sölkner, J., 2006. Comparison of production systems and selection criteria of Ankole cattle by breeders in Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 38, 571–581Google Scholar
  24. Zervas, N., Boyazoglu, J.G., Kailasakis, P., Papadimitriou T. and Flamant, J. C., 1975. Comparaison des races ovines Chios et Frisonne avec leurs croisements en Grece continentale, Annales de Génétique et de Sélection Animale, 7, 277–291CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Zervas, N., Hatziminaoglou, I., Boyazoglu, J., Georgoudis, A., 1991. Production potential and breeding schemes of some Mediterranean dairy sheep breeds, Animal Genetic Resources Information, 8, 13–26,  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900003060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.INRA, UR 0045 Laboratoire de Recherches sur le Développement de l’Elevage (LRDE)CorteFrance
  2. 2.Department of Nutrition Physiology and Feeding, Faculty of Animal Sciences and AquacultureAgricultural University of AthensAthensGreece
  3. 3.UMR Systèmes d’élevage Méditerranéens et Tropicaux (SELMET)INRA, CIRAD, MontpellierSupAgro, Univ MontpellierMontpellier CEDEX 1France
  4. 4.Hellenic Agricultural Organization, Veterinary Research InstituteThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations