Skip to main content
Log in

Different roughage:concentrate ratios with and without liquid residue of cassava for lambs

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This aim of this study was to evaluate the intake and apparent digestibility of nutrients, ingestive behavior, blood parameters, and performance of lambs fed two roughage:concentrate (R:C) ratios, with or without liquid residue of cassava (LRC). Forty lambs (19.5 ± 1.45 kg body weight) were distributed in a completely randomized 2 × 2 factorial design. The intake of dry matter (1311 g/day) and total digestible nutrients (755 g/day), and the intake (172 g/day) and digestibility (552 g/kg) of crude protein were higher for lambs fed R:C of 40:60. The R:C ratio of 80:20 promoted a higher intake (585 g/day) and digestibility (461 g/kg) of neutral detergent fiber. There was an intake of LRC of 1.37 L/day for lambs fed R:C of 80:20 and 0.42 L/day for lambs fed R:C of 40:60. The lambs fed R:C of 80:20 spent more time in feeding (326 m/day) and rumination (530 m/day). The metabolic profile and performance of lambs were not affected by LRC inclusion. The body weight gain (220 g/day) was higher in lambs fed R:C of 40:60. A roughage:concentrate ratio of 40:60 is recommended for lambs because it resulted in the best performance, regardless of supplementation with liquid residue of cassava.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists., 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (FAO)., 2014. Statistical Data bases. Available in: <http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx>. Access: 30 de June of 2016.

  • Hall, M.B., 2000. Calculation of non-structural carbohydrate content of feeds that contain non-protein nitrogen, (University of Florida, Gainesville).

    Google Scholar 

  • INMET (Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia), 2017. Parâmetros meteorológicos de Recife, Pernambuco. Available in: <http://www.inmet.gov.br/>.

  • Inoue, K.R.A., Souza, C.F., Matos, A.T., Santos, N.T., Alves, E.E.N., 2010. Características do solo submetido a tratamentos com biofertilizantes obtidos na digestão da manipueira. Tecnologia & Ciência Agropecuária, 4, 47–52.

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE. 2016. Levantamento sistemático da produção agrícola: pesquisa mensal de previsão e acompanhamento das safras agrícolas no ano civil. ftp://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Producao_Agricola/Levantamento_Sistematico_da_Producao_Agricola_[mensal]/Fasciculo/lspa_201604.pdf: Access: 30 de June of 2016.

  • Johnson, T.R. and Combs, D.K., 1991. Effects of prepartum diet, inert rumen bulk, and dietary polyethylene glycol on dry matter intake of lactating dairy cows. Journal Dairy Science, 74, 933–944.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneco, J.J., Harvey, J.W., and Bruss, M.L., 2008. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. 6th ed. Academic Press, San Diego, 916p.

  • Licitra, G., Hernandez, T.M. and Van Soest, P.J., 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57, 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. and Bateson P., 1988. Measuring behavior: an introductory guide. 3. ed. New York: Cambridge: University Press. 254.p

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D.R., 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International. 85, 1217–1240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council)., 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants, 7th ed. National Academic Press, Washington, DC, 292p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oduguwa, B.O., Oni, A.O., Arigbede, O.M., Adesunbola, J.O. and Sudekum, K.H., 2013. Feeding potential of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) peels ensiled with Leucaena leucocephala and Gliricidia sepium assessed with West African dwarf goats. Tropical Animal Health Production, 45, 1363–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, J.P.F., Ferreira, M.A., Alves, A.M.S.V., Melo, A.C.C., Andrade, I.B., Suassuna, J.M.A., Barros, L.J.A., Melo, T.T.B., and Silva, J.L., 2017. Spineless cactus as a replacement for sugarcane in the diets of finishing lambs. Tropical Animal Health Production. 49, 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos Filho, H.B., Véras, R.M.L., Ferreira, M.A.F., Silva, J.L., Vasconcelos, G.A., Soares, L.F.P. and Cardoso, D.B., 2015. Liquid residue of cassava as a replacement for corn in the diets of sheep. Tropical Animal Health Production, 47, 1083–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS, 2009. SAS/STAT Users Guide,Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senger, C.C.D., Kozloski, G.V., Sanchez, L.M.B., Mesquita, F.R., Alves, T.P. and Castagnino, D.S., 2008. Evaluation of autoclave procedures for fibre analysis in forage and concentrate feedstuffs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146: 169–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, J.L., Guim, A., Carvalho, F.F.R., Mattos, C.W., Menezes, D.R., Coelho, M.C.S.C, Garcia, D.A., Pereira, I.G., Pereira Neto, J.D., 2015. Multivariate analysis of characteristics associated with performance of dairy goats fed integral mango meal. Small Ruminant Research 133: 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sniffen, C.J., O'Connor, J.D., Van Soest, P.J., Fox, D.G. and Russell, J.B., 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal Animal Science, 70, 3562–3577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, S.O., Oliveira, L.C., Cavagis, A.D.M. and Botero, W.G., 2014. Cyanogenic residues: Environmental impacts, complexation with humic substances, and possible application as biofertilizer. Water, Air, Soil & Soil Pollution, Switzerland, 225, 2223–2227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, S.A., Ferreira, M.A., Véras, R.M.L., Azevedo, P.S., Santos Filho, H.B., Vasconcelos, G.A. and Oliveira, J.P.F., 2015. Características de carcaça e composição tecidual de ovinos Santa Inês alimentados com manipueira. Agrária, Recife, 10, 466–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, T.N.P., Detmann, E., Valadares Filho, S.C., Cunha, M., Queiroz, A.C. and Sampaio, C.B., 2011. In situ estimation of indigestible compounds contents in cattle feed and feces using bags made from different textiles. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 40, 666–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, P.J. and Robertson, J.B., 1985. Analysis of forages and fibrous foods. Ithaca, Cornell University. 202p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Xie, L., Yin, Z., Khanal, S.K., and Zhou, Q., 2016. Biorefinery approach for cassava-based industrial wastes: current status and opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 215, 50–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Barros Cardoso.

Ethics declarations

Statement of animal rights

All procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines set out by the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation in the Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animal for Experimental Purposes and were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee on Use of Animal for Research (CEUA) of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Arruda Leite, P.M.B., Véras, R.M.L., Véras, A.S.C. et al. Different roughage:concentrate ratios with and without liquid residue of cassava for lambs. Trop Anim Health Prod 50, 1807–1814 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1622-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1622-7

Keywords

Navigation