Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 1059–1064 | Cite as

Risk factors and indicators of reduced welfare of grazing dairy cows from selected smallholder dairy farms in Midlands Province, Zimbabwe

  • Z. Matore
  • P. Woods
  • S. Kagler
Regular Articles


Zimbabwe’s smallholder dairying faces many challenges that affect the welfare of dairy cows; however, the status of this welfare has not yet been determined. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Midlands Province on 41 active smallholder dairy farms with 86 cows in winter and summer to determine the risk factors and indicators to impaired cow welfare. These objectives were achieved using farmer questionnaires and direct observations. Eleven percent of the observed cows were severely lame in summer while only 5% were severely lame in winter. Lameness was significantly associated with season, absence of shade, breed, and low dipping frequency; 58% of the cows had low body condition scores (BC < 3) and this low BC was associated with low frequency of protein (p = 0.002) and vitamin (p = 0.012) supplementation recorded in more than 52% of the farms visited. In winter, only 11% of the observed cows were heavily soiled (score 3), while in summer 64% of the cows were heavily soiled and this was associated with slurry accumulation in more than 80% of the observed cattle pens as well as the study season (p < 0.001). A quarter (26%) of the studied animals had visible teat lesions on the teat skin and this was associated with the type of lubricant used (p = 0.011). Only 34% of the cows allowed an approaching stockman to touch them and this was associated with shouting (p = 0.012) and whipping of cows (p = 0.002). The study concluded that welfare of dairy cows was poor in most of the smallholder dairy farms studied.


Risk factors Indicators Cow welfare 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Aleri, J. W., E. M. Mogoa, and C. M. Mulei. 2012. Welfare of dairy cattle in the smallholder ( zero-grazing ) production systems in Nairobi and its environs. Anim. Welf. 24:1–7.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, J., and S. Anderson. 2013. Managing Heat Stress and its Impact on Cow Behavior. 28 th Annu. West. Dairy Manag. Conf. 150–162. Available from:
  3. Dhakal, K., F. Tiezzi, J. S. Clay, and C. Maltecca. 2015. Short communication: Genomic selection for hoof lesions in first-parity US Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 98:3502–3507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Foditsch, C., G. Oikonomou, V. S. Machado, M. L. Bicalho, E. K. Ganda, S. F. Lima, R. Rossi, B. L. Ribeiro, A. Kussler, and R. C. Bicalho. 2016. Lameness prevalence and risk factors in large dairy farms in upstate New York. Model development for the prediction of claw horn disruption lesions. PLoS One. 11:e0146718.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Grandin, T. 2010. Animals Make us Human. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  6. Huxley, J. N. 2013. Impact of lameness and claw lesions in cows on health and production. Livest. Sci. 156.
  7. Oliveira, L., and P. L. Ruegg. 2014. Treatments of clinical mastitis occurring in cows on 51 large dairy herds in Wisconsin. J. Dairy Sci. 97:5426–5436. Scholar
  8. Schlageter-Tello, A., E. A. M. Bokkers, P. W. G. G. Koerkamp, T. Van Hertem, S. Viazzi, C. E. B. Romanini, I. Halachmi, C. Bahr, D. Berckmans, and K. Lokhorst. 2015. Relation between observed locomotion traits and locomotion score in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 98:8623–8633.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sulayeman, M., and A. Fromsa. 2012. Lameness in dairy cattle: Prevalence, risk factors and impact on milk production. Glob. Vet. 8:1–7.Google Scholar
  10. Tebug, S. F., S. Chikagwa-Malunga, and S. Wiedemann. 2012. On-farm evaluation of dairy farming innovations uptake in northern Malawi. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 24:1–9.Google Scholar
  11. Windschnurer, I., X. Boivin, and S. Waiblinger. 2009. Reliability of an avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals’ responsiveness to humans and a preliminary investigation of its association with farmers’ attitudes on bull fattening farms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 117:117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zvinorova, P. I., T. E. Halimani, R. T. Mano, and N. T. Ngongoni. 2013. Viability of smallholder dairying in Wedza, Zimbabwe. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 45:1007–1015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceUniversity of ZimbabweHarareZimbabwe

Personalised recommendations