|
Village
|
Benefits
|
|---|
|
Milk consumption
|
Meat consumption
|
Income
|
Bride price
|
Social status
|
Investment
|
Employment
|
Draught power
|
Hides
|
|---|
|
Zone 2a
|
Md (Mn-Mx)
|
23 (17-30)
|
11 (10-16)
|
33 (32-50)
|
10.5 (7-20)
|
6 (4-14)
|
_d_
|
21 (0-21)
|
3 (1-6)
|
3 (3-3)
|
|
N
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
3
| |
1
|
4
|
2
|
|
Zone 1b
|
cMd (Mn-Mx)
|
20 (6-32)
|
6.5 (2-9)
|
34 (23-68)
|
14 (5-18)
|
7 (1-12)
|
17 (0-17)
|
12 (4-21)
|
4 (1-9)
|
3 (2-3)
|
|
N
|
8
|
8
|
8
|
7
|
8
|
1
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
|
Total
|
Md (Mn-Mx)
|
21 (6-32)
|
8 (2-16)
|
33 (23-68)
|
11 (5-20)
|
7 (1-14)
|
17 (0-17)
|
12 (4-21)
|
3 (1-9)
|
3 (2-3)
|
|
N
|
12
|
12
|
12
|
11
|
11
|
1
|
7
|
10
|
6
|
- n, number of FGDs that contributed data to that benefit. Median scores for investment and employment as a benefit was not compared between villages, gender and zones due to few cases
- aArea with low to moderate cattle-wildlife interactions
- bArea with intense cattle-wildlife interactions
- cMd, median; Mn, minimum; Mx, maximum
- dDash (-) means that the benefit was not mentioned hence not included in proportional piling