Skip to main content

Digestion and metabolism of low and high residual feed intake Nellore bulls

Tropical Animal Health and Production volume 49, pages 529–535 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Understanding the reasons why animals of similar performances have different feed requirements is important to increase profits for cattle producers and to decrease the environmental footprint of beef cattle production. This study was carried out aiming to identify the associations between residual feed intake (RFI) and animal performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood metabolites related to energy balance of young Nellore bulls during the finishing period. Animals previously classified as low (n = 13) and high RFI (n = 12), with average initial body weight of 398 kg and age of 503 days were used. Cattle were fed a high energy diet and were slaughtered when rib fat thickness measured by ultrasound between the 12th and 13th ribs reached the minimum of 4 mm. A completely randomized design was adopted, being data analyzed with a mixed model that included the random effect of slaughter group, the fixed effect of RFI class, and linear effect of the covariate feedlot time. No differences were found (p > 0.10) between RFI classes for performance, dry matter, and nutrients intake. However, dry (p = 0.0911) and organic matter (p = 0.0876) digestibility tended to be lower, and digestibility of neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein (p = 0.0017), and total digestible nutrients (p = 0.0657) were lower for high RFI animals, indicating lesser capacity of food utilization. Difference between low and high RFI animals was also found for blood cortisol at the end of the trial (p = 0.0044), having low RFI animals lower cortisol concentrations. Differences in the ability to digest food can affect the efficiency of transforming feed into meat by Nellore cattle.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Association of Official Analytical Chemists [AOAC]. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.

  • Baker, S.D., Szasz, J.I., Klein, T.A., Kuber, P.S., Hunt, C.W., Glaze Jr., J.B., Falk, D., Richard, R., Miller, J.C., Battaglia, R.A., and Hill, R.A. 2006. Residual feed intake of purebred Angus steers: Effects on meat quality and palatability. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 938--945.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casali, A.O., Detmann, E., Valadares Filho, S.C., Pereira, J.C., Henriques, L.T., Freitas, S.G., and Paulino, M.F. 2008. Influence of incubation time and particles size on indigestible compounds contents in cattle feeds and feces obtained by in situ procedures. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37, 335--342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro Bulle, F.C., Paulino, P.V., Sanches, A.C., and Sainz, R.D. 2007. Growth, carcass quality, and protein and energy metabolism in beef cattle with different growth potentials and residual feed intakes. Journal of Animal Science, 85, 928--936.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, R.C., Adams, D.C., Wallace, J.D., and Galyean, M.L. 1986. Predicting digestibility of different diets with internal markers: Evaluation of four potential markers. Journal of Animal Science, 63, 1476--1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durunna, O.N., Colazo, M.G., Ambrose, D.J., McCartney, D., Baron, V.S., and Basarab, J.A. 2012. Evidence of residual feed intake reranking in crossbred replacement heifers. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 734--741.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, C., Kenny, D.A., Deighton, M.H., Fahey, A.G., and McGee, M. 2013 Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 5789--5800.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, C., Kenny, D.A., Fahey, A.G., and McGee, M. 2014. Feeding behavior, ruminal fermentation, and performance of pregnant beef cows differing in phenotypic residual feed intake offered grass silage. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 2170--2181.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, R.C., Sainz, R.D., and Leme, P.R. 2013. Protein metabolism, feed energy partitioning, behavior patterns and plasma cortisol in Nellore steers with high and low residual feed intake. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 42, 44--50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M.B. 2000. Neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrates: Nutritional relevance and analysis, a laboratory manual. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herd, R.M., and Arthur, P.F. 2009. Physiological basis for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science, 87, E64--E71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herd, R.M., Oddy, V.H., and Richardson, E.C. 2004. Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 1. Review of potential mechanisms. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 44, 423--430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.E., Ferrell, C.L., and Jenkins, T.G. 2003. The history of energetic efficiency research: Where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Animal Science, 81, E27--E38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P., Kenny, D.A., Earley, B., and McGee, M. 2012. Grazed grass herbage intake and performance of beef heifers with predetermined phenotypic residual feed intake classification. Animal, 6, 1648--1661.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A.K., McGee, M., Crews, D.H., Fahey, A.G., Wylie, A.R., and Kenny, D.A. 2010. Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science, 88, 109--123.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A.K., McGee, M., Crews, D.H., Lynch, C.O., Wylie, A.R., Evans, R.D., and Kenny, D.A. 2011. Relationship between body measurements, metabolic hormones, metabolites and residual feed intake in performance tested pedigree beef bulls. Livestock Science, 135, 8--16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, R.M., Swiger, L.A., Chambers, D., and Gregory, K.E. 1963. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 22, 486--494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licitra, G., Hernandez, T.M., and Van Soest, P.J. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57, 347--358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malheiros, J.M., Baldassini, W.A., Dias, V.A.D., Silva, J.A.V., Curi, R.A., and Chardulo, L.A.L. 2015. Chemical and sensory meat characteristics of Nellore cattle (Bos indicus) finished with different levels of backfat thickness in the Longissimus thoracis muscle. Boletim de Indústria Animal, 72, 341--348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, M., Welch, C.M., Ramirez, J.A., Carstens, G.E., Price, W.J., Hall, J.B., and Hill, R.A. 2014. Relationships of feeding behaviors with average daily gain, dry matter intake, and residual feed intake in Red Angus-sired cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 5214--5221.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D.R. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International, 85, 1217--1240.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S.S., Mujibi, F.D., and Sherman, E.L. 2009. Molecular basis for residual feed intake in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 87, E41--E47.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council [NRC]. 2000. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Updated 7ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Nascimento, C.F., Branco, R.H., Bonilha, S.F.M., Cyrillo, J.N.S.G., Negrão, J.A., and Mercadante, M.E.Z. 2015. Residual feed intake and blood variables in young Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 93, 1318--1326.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E.C., and Herd, R.M. 2004. Biological basis for variation in residual feed intake in beef cattle. 2. Synthesis of results following divergent selection. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 44, 431--440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, E.C., Herd, R.M., Archer, J.A., and Arthur, P.F. 2004. Metabolic differences in Angus steers divergently selected for residual feed intake. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 44, 441--452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorzi, K., Bonilha, S.F.M., Queiroz, A.C., Branco, R.H., Sobrinho, T.L., and Duarte, M.S. 2013. Meat quality of young Nellore bulls with low and high residual feed intake. Meat Science, 93, 593–599.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Karina Zorzi (in memorian) for her rich contribution in this trial. We also thank São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for funding project number 2013/19205-1.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Zootecnia, Centro APTA Bovinos de Corte, Rodovia Carlos Tonani, km 94. C.P. 63, 14.160-970, Sertãozinho, SP, Brazil

    Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha, Renata Helena Branco, Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante, Joslaine Noely dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo & Fábio Morato Monteiro

  2. Instituto de Zootecnia, Centro APTA Bovinos de Leite, Rua Heitor Penteado, 56, 13.460-000, Nova Odessa, SP, Brazil

    Enilson Geraldo Ribeiro

Authors
  1. Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renata Helena Branco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joslaine Noely dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fábio Morato Monteiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Enilson Geraldo Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonilha, S.F.M., Branco, R.H., Mercadante, M.E.Z. et al. Digestion and metabolism of low and high residual feed intake Nellore bulls. Trop Anim Health Prod 49, 529–535 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1224-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1224-9

Keywords

  • Beef cattle
  • Cortisol
  • Digestibility
  • Efficiency
  • Nutrients intake