Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics

Abstract

The availability of wood by-products for bedding material is falling in many regions due to rising demand for other uses. The objective of this study was to evaluate six alternative litter sources—river bed sand, coconut husk, rice hulls, Guinea grass, newspaper, and corncob—as a substitute for wood shavings (WS). The trial was carried out over 35 days in an open-sided and naturally ventilated broiler house under conditions of high ambient temperatures and relative humidity. During the brooding period (0 to 14 days), chicks raised on grass had lower (P < 0.05) footpad temperature than those grown on WS. After the brooding period (15 to 35 days), the temperatures of both litter and birds were higher (P < 0.05) for coconut husk than for WS. Grass litter resulted in lower (P < 0.05) final BW, FCR, and production efficiency. Sand and rice hulls were associated with lower (P < 0.05) survival rate and higher (P < 0.05) gizzard weight. Litter type did not affect carcass and meat yields. The footpad dermatitis score, associating incidence and severity, was not statistically different among the litter substrates tested, although numerically higher in coconut husk, grass, and corncob. The results obtained in this experiment indicate that, in a hot and humid environment, all materials except grass can be used as a substitute for wood shavings with comparable production efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adebayo, I.A., Awoniyi, T.A.M. and Akenroye, A.H., 2009. Growth performance and meat wholesomeness of broiler chickens reared on different types of litter materials, Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 7, 209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anisuzzaman, M. and S.D. Chowdhury, 1996. Use of four types of litter for rearing broilers, British Poultry Science, 37, 541–545.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atapattu, N.S.B.M. and Wickramasinghe, K.P., 2007. The use of refused tea as a litter material for broiler chickens, Poultry Science, 86, 968–972.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Atencio, J.L., Fernández, J.A., Gernat, A.G. and Murillo J.G., 2010. Effect of pine wood shavings, rice hulls and river bed sand on broiler productivity when used as a litter sources, International Journal of Poultry Science, 9, 240–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benabdeljelil, K. and Ayachi, A., 1996. Evaluation of alternative litter material for poultry, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 5, 203–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bessei, W. 2006. Welfare of broilers: a review. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 62, 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilgili, S.E., Montenegro, G.I., Hess, J.B. and Eckman, M.K., 1999. Sand as litter for rearing broiler chickens, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 8, 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Biswas, S. K., Wahid, M.A., Karim, M.J., Pramanik, M.A.H. and Rokonuzzaman, M., 2001. Evaluation of different materials for broiler performance, coccidial oocyst population and level of N, P and K during winter, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 4, 1565–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowers, B.D., Hess, J.B., Bilgili, S.F., Blake, J.P. and Eckman, M.K., 2003. Sand litter temperatures during brooding, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12, 271–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burke, G.B., Pescatore, A.J., Cantor, A.H., Straw, M.L., Xiangbai, H. and Johnson, T.H., 1993. Newspaper as a litter material and its effect on the performance of broilers, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2, 154–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, J.D., Purswell, J.L., Columbus, E.P. and Kiess, A.S., 2010. Evaluation of chopped switchgrass as a litter material, International Journal of Poultry Science, 9, 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ekstrand, C., Algers, B. and Svedberg, J., 1997. Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 31, 167–174.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garcês, A., Afonso, S.M.S., Chilundo, A. and Jairoce, C.T.S., 2013. Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 1. Litter characteristics and quality, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 22, 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goetten, W.G., Scariot, M.A., Baade, E.A.S. and Picoli, K.P. 2009. Camas de aviário. In: Proceedings of the X Feira de Conhecimento Tecnológico e Científico, Santa Catarina, Brazil, 1–5.

  15. Guardia, S., Konsak, B., Combes, S., Levenez, F., Cauquil, L., Guillot, J.-F., Moreau-Vauzelle C., Lessire, M., Juin, H. and Gabriel, I., 2011. Effects of stocking density on the growth performance and digestive microbiota of broiler chickens, Poultry Science, 90, 1878–1889.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, Y., Yoo, J. S., Kim, H.J., Wang, Y., Chen, Y.J., Cho, J.H. and Kim, H., 2009. Effect of bedding types and different nutrient densities on growth performance, visceral organ weight, and blood characteristics in broiler chickens, Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 18, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. IBM, 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics 18. IBM, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Malone, G.W., Chaloupka, G.W. and Saylor, W.W., 1983. Influence of litter type and size on broiler performance. 1. Factors affecting litter consumption, Poultry Science, 62, 1741–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meluzzi, A., Fabbri, C., Folegatti, E. and Sirri, F., 2008. Survey of chicken rearing conditions in Italy: effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis and carcase injuries, British Poultry Science, 49, 257–264.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meluzzi A. and Sirri, F., 2009. Welfare of broiler chickens, Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8, 161–173 (suppl.1).

  21. Ogedengbe, T.I., Fatomilola, E.O. and Bello, O.R., 2013. Evaluation of thermal conductivity of selected biomass composites, Research Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2, 326–335.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Santos, E.C., Cotta, J.T.B., Muniz, J.A., Fonseca R.A. and Torres, D.M., 2000. Avaliação de alguns materiais usados como cama sobre o desempenho de frangos de corte, Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 14, 1024–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Toghyani, M., Gheisari, A., Modaresi, M., Tabeidian, S.A. and Toghyani, M., 2010. Effect of different litter material on performance and behavior of broiler chickens, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 122, 48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Torok, V. A., Hughes, R.J., Ophel-Keller, K., Ali, M. and MacAlpine, R., 2009. Influence of different litter materials on cecal microbiota colonization in broiler chickens, Poultry Science, 88, 2474–2481.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Willis, W.L., Murray, C. and Talbott, C., 1997. Evaluation of leaves as a litter material, Poultry Science, 76, 1138–1140.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xavier, D.B., Broom, D.M., McManus, C.M.P., Torres, C. and Bernal, F.E.M., 2010. Number of flocks on the same litter and carcase condemnations due to cellulitis, arthritis and contact foot-pad dermatitis in broilers, British Poultry Science, 51, 586–591.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice P. J. T. Garcês.

Ethics declarations

All bird procedures were conducted according to the guidelines for the care and use of farm and laboratory animals approved by the Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of the Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garcês, A.P.J.T., Afonso, S.M.S., Chilundo, A. et al. Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics. Trop Anim Health Prod 49, 369–374 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1202-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Broiler
  • Alternative litter material
  • Performance
  • Carcass characteristics