Abstract
Unsexed Ross 308 broilers were raised under three stocking densities (30, 35, and 40 kg BW/m2) and three daily feed withdrawal periods (0, 8, and 12 h daily) during a 42-day production period. The effects of stocking density and feed withdrawal on growth performance and carcass characteristics were investigated. The feed intake of broilers raised at the stocking density of 30 kg BW/m2 was higher than those of broilers reared at 35 and 40 kg BW/m2, but broilers raised under the different stocking densities did not differ significantly in 42-day body weight, body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and mortality rate. Forty-two-day body weight, body weight gain, and feed intake were reduced as the duration of feed withdrawal increased, but feeding program affected neither feed conversion ratio nor mortality rate. There was a stocking density effect on thigh percentage while feeding program influenced breast, back, wing, neck, liver, gizzard, and heart percentages. There were stocking density × feed withdrawal interaction effects on feed intake during the starter and grower periods. It is suggested that for profitable broiler production in the tropics stocking density of 40 kg BW/m2 and daily feed withdrawal for 8 h from 7 to 35 days of age be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acheampong-Boateng, O., Benyi, K., Norris, D. and Maake, M.S., 2012. Effects of feed withdrawal periods of different durations on the growth performance of male Hybro broiler chickens. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(29): 4140 – 4144.
Akyuz, A., 2009. Effects of some climates parameters of environmentally uncontrollable broiler houses on broiler performance. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(12): 2608–2612
Azarnik, A., Bojarpour, M., Eslami, M., Ghorbani, M.R. and Mirzadeh, K., 2010. The effect of different levels of diet protein on broiler performance in ad libitum and feed restriction methods. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9 (3): 631–634.
Benyi, K., Acheampong-Boateng, O. and Mahlako, K.T., 2012. Responses of male broiler chickens from two genetic groups to different stocking densities in a semi-arid subtropical environment. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44: 185 – 190.
Benyi, K., Acheampong-Boateng, O., Norris, D. and Ligaraba, T.J., 2010. Response of Ross 308 and Hubbard broiler chickens to feed removal for different durations during the day. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42: 1421 – 1426.
Benyi, K., Netshipale, A.J., Mahlako, K.T. and Gwata, E.T., 2015a. Effect of genotype and stocking density on broiler performance during two subtropical seasons. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 47 (5): 969–974.
Cuddington, S., 2004. High energy diets affect broiler chicken welfare. Accessed on 10th Nov 2015 from http://www.facs.sk.ca/pdf/animal_care_award/articles_2004/cuddington_chickens.pdf.
Demir, E., Sarika, S., Sekereglu, A., Ozcan, M.A. and Seker, Y., 2004. Effects of early and late feed restriction or feed withdrawal on growth performance, ascites and blood constituents of broiler chickens. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 54: 152–158.
Dozier W.A., Thaxton J.P., Branton, S.L., Morgan, G.W., Miles, D.M., Roush, W.B., Lott, B.D., and Vizzier-Thaxton, Y., 2005. Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yield of heavy broilers. Poultry Science, 84, 1332–1338.
Estevez, I., 2007. Density allowances for broilers: Where to set the limits? Poultry Science, 86: 1265–1272.
Jones, G.P.D. and Farrel, D.J., 1992. Early-life food restriction of chicken. II. Effect of food restriction on the development of fat tissue. British Poultry Science, 33: 589 – 601.
Jones, G.P.D., 1995. Manipulation of organ growth by early life food restriction: Its influence on the development of ascites in broiler chickens, British Poultry Science, 36: 135 – 142.
Khetani, T.L., Nkukwana, T.T., Chimonyo, M. and Muchenje, V., 2009. Effect of feed restriction on broiler performance. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41: 379 – 384.
Maheri-Sis, N., Naeim Saber, S., Shaddel-Telli, A., Hatefinezhad, K., Gorbani, A. and Yousefi, J., 2011. Effect of feed restriction on growth performance of broiler chickens. Annals of Biological Research, 2 (6): 247–252.
Mahmud, A., Khattak, F.M., Ali, Z. And Pasha, T., 2008. Effect of early feed restriction on broiler performance meal feeding on performance, carcass characters and blood constituents of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8: 2069–2074.
Melesse, A., 2011. Performance and physiological responses of naked-neck chickens and their F1 Crosses with commercial layer breeds to long-term high ambient temperature. Global Veterinaria, 6: 272–280.
Meluzzi, A. and Sirri, F., 2009. Welfare of broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8: (Supplement l1), 161 – 173.
Minitab, 2014. Minitab 16 statistical software. Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
Onbasilar, E.E., Yalcin, S., Torlak, E. and Ozdemir., P., 2009. Effects of early feed restriction on live performance, carcass characteristics, meat and liver composition, some blood parameters, heterophil-lymphocyte ratio, antibody production and tonic immobility duration. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41: 1513–1519.
Sahraei, M., 2013. Improvement production efficiency and carcass quality through feed restriction programs in broiler chickens. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 29 (2), 193–210.
Saleh, E.A., Watkins, S.E., Waldroup, A.L. and Waldroup, P.W., 2004. Comparison of energy feeding programs and early feed restriction on live performance and carcass quality of large broilers grown for further processing at 9 to 12 weeks of age. International Journal of Poultry Science, 3: 61–69.
Santoso, U., 2001. Effect of early feed restriction on growth, fat accumulation and meat composition in unsexed broiler chickens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 14: 1585 – 1591.
Sekeroglu, A., Sarica, M. and Guley, M.S., 2011. Effect of stocking density on chick performance, internal organ weighs and blood parameters in broilers. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10, 246–250.
Skomorucha, I., Muchacka, R., Sosnowka-Czajka, E. and Herbul, E., 2009. Response of broiler chickens from three genetic groups to different stocking densities. Annals of Animal Science, 9: 175–184.
Škrbić, Z., Pavlovski, Z., Lukić, M., Peric, L., and Milocevic, 2009. The effect of stocking density on certain broiler welfare parameters individual broiler welfare parameters. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 25, 1–2, 11–12.
Škrbić, Z., Pavlovski, Z., Lukić, M., Petričević, V., Miljković, B. and Marinkov, G., 2012. The effect of the diet on incidence of footpad lesions and productivity of broilers. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 28 (2): 353–360.
Tong, H.B., Lu, J., Zou, J.M., Wang, Q. and Shi, S.R., 2012. Effects of stocking density on growth performance, carcass yield, and immune status of a local chicken breed. Poultry Science, 91: 667–673.
Urdenta-Rincon, M. and Leeson, S., 2002. Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction on growth characteristics of male broiler chicken. Poultry Science, 81: 769–788.
Uzum, M.H. and Oral Toplu, H.D., 2013. Effects of stocking density and feed restriction on performance, carcass, meat quality characteristics and some stress parameters in broilers under heat stress. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire, 164 (12): 546 – 554.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Declaration
All human and animal studies have been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Venda and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rambau, M.D., Mudau, M.L., Makhanya, S.D. et al. Effects of stocking density and daily feed withdrawal periods on the performance of broiler chickens in a semi-arid environment. Trop Anim Health Prod 48, 1547–1554 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1126-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1126-2