Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of trait preferences of Nguni farmers located in semi-arid and sub-humid environments

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare trait preferences of Nguni cattle owners located in semi-arid and sub-humid environments. Data were collected from a total of 300 Nguni cattle-owning households using structured questionnaires, 150 households from each environment. Stature, body depth and body length were preferred more in sub-humid areas than in semi-arid areas. In sub-humid environments, preference was given to fertility traits, with farmers more likely to highly prefer calving interval and age at first calving (AFC). Semi-arid areas had more households with cows with extended calving interval (2 and 3 years) than sub-humid areas. Environmental differences affect fertility of Nguni cows and trait preferences of communal farmers in Southern Africa. Differences in environment and trait preferences of farmers should be considered when designing communal breeding programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Cushman, R.A., Allan, M.F., Kuehn L.A., 2008. Characterization of biological types of cattle: indicator traits of fertility in beef cows. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37, 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kgosikoma, O.O., Mogotsi, K., Makhabu, S.W., 2012. Cattle productivity and nutritional limitation in the semi-arid Makgadikgadi Region of Botswana. Journal of Agriculture and Biodiversity Research, 1(7), 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapiye, C., Chimonyo, M., Dzama, K., Raats, J.G., Mapekula, M., 2009. Opportunities for improving Nguni cattle production in the smallholder farming systems of South Africa. Livestock Science, 124, 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M., 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications, pp. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical analytical systems (SAS) institute, 2008. SAS guide for personal computers. Cary, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strydom, P.E., 2008. Do indigenous Southern African cattle breeds have the right genetics for commercial production of quality meat? Meat Science, 80, 86–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woldu, T., Beyene, A., 2013. Current status and future prospects of the endangered Sheko breed of cattle (African Bos Taurus) in Ethiopia: A review paper. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Agriculture and Veterinary, 13(13) 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethics

The study was granted the ethical clearance certificate (HSS/0164/013D) by the University of KwaZulu-Natal’s Research Ethics Committee and has, therefore, been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All persons interviewed gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Chimonyo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zindove, T.J., Chimonyo, M. Comparison of trait preferences of Nguni farmers located in semi-arid and sub-humid environments. Trop Anim Health Prod 47, 607–611 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0750-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0750-y

Keywords

Navigation