Skip to main content

Are government veterinary paraprofessionals serving the poor? The perceptions of smallholder livestock farmers in Western Kenya

Abstract

The liberalization of clinical veterinary services in Kenya introduced new service providers into the animal health service sector. This study examines the perceptions of livestock farmers regarding these service providers and analyses the factors that influence their choice of alternative service providers in Kakamega County. The empirical analysis shows that private animal health assistants were perceived to provide better services than alternative providers because they are more accessible and offer services on credit. Results from a multinomial logit model reveal that more educated, wealthier, and older farmers are more likely to use government services. The study concludes that it is imperative to better target the poor and to integrate private service providers into government animal health programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Farmers who treated their livestock by themselves are part of the non-trained service provider category in the MNLM analysis. Further analysis was undertaken to disaggregate treatment by self and only non-trained service providers into separate categories, there was no significant difference between the two results. The probability of farmers who treated livestock by themselves to perform similar services for other farmers underpins the aggregation. Three veterinary surgeons are part of the private animal health assistant category but they did not perform any substantial clinical services.

References

  1. Ahuja, V., 2004. The economic rationale of public and private sector roles in the provision of animal health services, Revue Scientifique et Technique 23(1), 33–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), 2011. World livestock 2011: Livestock in food security, (FAO, Rome)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Forman, S., Plante, C., Murray, G., Rey, B., Belton, D., Evans, B., and Steinmetz, P., 2012. Position paper: Improving governance for effective Veterinary Services in developing countries – a priority for donor funding, Revue Scientifique et Technique 31, 647–660

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grace, D., Gilbert, J., Randolph, T. and Kang’ethe, E., 2012. The multiple burden of zoonotic disease and an ecohealth approach to their assesment, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44, 67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Halliday, J., Daborn, C., Auty, H., Mtema, Z., Lembo, T., Bronsvoort, B. M. D., Handel, J., Knobel, D., Hampson, K. and Cleaveland, S., 2012. Bringing together emerging and endemic zoonoses surveillance: Shared challenges and a common solution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 367, 2872–2880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoang, L.A., Castella, J.C., and Novosad, P., 2006. Social networks and information access: Implications for agricultural extension in a rice farming community in northern Vietnam, Agriculture and Human Values, 23, 513–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ilukor, J., Nielsen, T., and Birner, R., 2014. Determinants of referrals from paraprofessionals to veterinarians in Uganda and Kenya, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 114, 164–173

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, B., Grace, D., Kock, R., Alonso, S., Rushton, J., Said, M. Y., McKeever, D., Mutua, F., Young, J., McDermott, J. and Pfeiffer, D. U. (2013). Zoonosis emergence linked to agricultural intensification and environmental change, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 8399–8404

  9. Mcleod, A. and Wilsmore, A., 2002. The delivery of animal health services to the poor: a review. In: Perry, B., Randolph, T.F., McDermott, J.J., Sones, J.R., and Thornton, P.K. (eds.), Investing in animal health research to alleviate poverty, (International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi), appendix 11

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mockshell, J., Ilukor, J., and Birner, R., 2014. Providing animal health services to the poor in Northern Ghana: Rethinking the role of community animal health workers?, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 46, 475–480

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oruko, L. and Ndung’u, L., 2009. An analysis of animal healthcare service delivery in Kenya, in: Kirsten, J.F., Dorward, A.R., Poulton, C., Vink, N. (Eds.), Institutional Economics Perspectives on African Agricultural Development, (International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington), 257–272

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oruko, L., Upton, M., and McLeod, A., 2000. Restructuring of animal health services in Kenya: Constraints, Prospects and Options, Development Policy Review, 18, 123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial assistance from the Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst (EED), Bonn, and the Institute of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences in the Tropics and Sub–Tropics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Onyango K’Oloo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

K’Oloo, T.O., Ilukor, J., Mockshell, J. et al. Are government veterinary paraprofessionals serving the poor? The perceptions of smallholder livestock farmers in Western Kenya. Trop Anim Health Prod 47, 243–245 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0697-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Veterinary service provision
  • Privatization
  • Poverty
  • Public health
  • Kenya