Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a predictive model for daughter pregnancy rate and standardization of voluntary waiting period in Murrah buffalo

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A predictive model for daughter pregnancy rate (DPR) in Indian Murrah buffaloes has been developed. The data pertaining to first lactation reproduction traits, viz., age at first calving (AFC), first service period (FSP), and number of services per first conception (NS/FCON) of 719 Murrah buffaloes calved from 1985 to 2010 at the National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal (Haryana), India were adjusted against significant environmental influence. First lactation reproduction records of 474 Murrah buffaloes were used for determining voluntary waiting period (VWP) and estimating DPR. Seven simple and multiple regression models in each case were developed where the buffaloes had their first insemination after 63 days (DPR 63), 84 days (DPR 84), and 105 days (DPR 105) of first calving. Among the seven models (I to VII) for DPR 63, DPR 84, and DPR 105, model II, having only FSP as an independent reproduction variable, was found to be the best prediction model, based on the four statistical criterions (high coefficient of determination (R 2), low mean sum of squares due to error (MSSe), conceptual predictive (CP) value, and Bayesian information criterion (BIC)). Three linear equations were developed using model II, viz., DPR 63 = 0.0033 (274 − FSP), DPR 84 = 0.0027 (332 − FSP), and DPR 105 = 0.0027 (310 − FSP). The average errors for the prediction of DPR 63, DPR 84, and DPR 105 were 1, 13, and 8 %, respectively. Therefore, 63 days of VWP is the optimum period for getting the best DPR in Indian Murrah buffaloes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adamec, V., Cassell, B.G., Smith, E.P., Pearson, R.E., 2006. Effects of inbreeding in the Damon dystocia and stillbirths in US Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 307–314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H., 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE transactions on automatic control, 19(6), 716–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera,V. E., 2011. The economic value of changes in 21-day pregnancy rate and what controls this value. Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Caraviello D.Z., Weigel K.A., Craven M., Gianola D, Cook N.B., Nordlund K.V., Fricke P.M., Wiltbank M.C., 2006. Analysis of reproductive performance of lactating cows on large dairy farms using machine learning algorithms. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 4703–4722.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, K.T., 2011. Buffalo Breeding. Booklet No. 591, Buffalo: BFS- 5, Agricultural & Environmental Education. www.inseda.org/. 12/27/2011.

  • De Vries. A., 2010. Economic improvements of genetic improvements in milk production, reproduction and productive life. Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida. (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu).

  • Demetrio D.G., Santos R.M., Demetrio C.G., Vasconcelos J.L., 2007. Factors affecting conception rates following artificial insemination or embryo transfer in lactating Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 90, 5073–5082.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R.D., Wallace M., Shalloo L., Garrick D.J. and Dillon P., 2006. Financial implications of recent declines in reproduction and survival of Holstein-Friesian cows in spring-calving Irish dairy herds. Agricultural Systems, 89, 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization, 2012. Buffalo production and research. (www.fao.org.com).

  • García-Ispierto I, López-Gatius F, Santolaria P, Yániz J. L., Nogareda C, López-Béjar M., 2007. Factors affecting the fertility of high producing dairy herds in northeastern Spain. Theriogenology, 67, 632–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, W.R. (1990). Guide for LSMLMW, PC-1 Version, mixed model least square and maximum likely hood computer programme. Mimeograph, Ohio State University, USA.

  • Interbull, 2003. Description of national genetic evaluation systems for dairy cattle traits as practised in different Interbull member countries. Interbull. http://www-interbull.slu.se/national_ges_info2/framesida-ges.htm. Accessed Oct. 9, 2003.

  • Kebede, K. and Gebretsadik, G., 2010. Statistical modelling of growth performance data on sheep using mixed linear models. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 22(4), Article #80. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/4/kefe22080.htm.

  • Kramer, C.Y., 1957. Extension of multiple range tests to group correlated adjusted means. Biometrics, 13, 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M.T., Van Raden, P.M. and Hutchinson, J. L., 2004. Use of early lactation days open records for genetic evaluation of cow fertility. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 2274–2284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Gatius F, García-Ispierto I, Santolaria P, Yániz J, Nogareda C, López-Béjar M., 2006. Screening for high fertility in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology, 65, 1678–1689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallows, C L., 1973. Some Comments on Cp. Technometrics, 15, 661–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal, S., Prakash B.S. and Palta P., 2008. Peripheral plasma FSH concentrations in relation to expression of oestrus in Murrah buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Buffalo Bulletin, 27(4), 258–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman H.D., Wright J.R., and Miller R.H., 2008. Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 458 (Abstr.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R.E., 2006. Economic evaluation of breeding objectives in dairy cattle: Intensive specialized milk production in temperate zones. In: Proc. 3rd World Congress Genet tics Application in Livestock, 11–17.

  • Perera, B.M., 2011. Reproductive cycles of buffalo. Animal Reproduction Science, 124(3–4), 194–199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G.E., 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annuals of Statistics. 6(2), 461–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA., 2003. Estimated relative conception rate evaluation. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.

  • Van Raden P.M., 2004. Selection on net merit to improve life time profit. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 3125–3131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raden, P.M., Sanders A.H., Tooker M.E., Miller R.H., Norman H.D., Kuhn M.T., and Wiggans G.R., 2004. Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 2285–2292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World-agriculture.com, 2011. Animal Husbandry - Water Buffalo Breeding and its Characteristics.http://www.worldagriculture.com/buffalo/water_buffalo_breeding.php.12/20/2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandrashekhar S. Patil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patil, C.S., Chakravarty, A.K., Singh, A. et al. Development of a predictive model for daughter pregnancy rate and standardization of voluntary waiting period in Murrah buffalo. Trop Anim Health Prod 46, 279–284 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0486-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0486-0

Keywords

Navigation