Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 679–686 | Cite as

Artificial insemination of pigs reared under smallholder production system in northeastern India: success rate, genetic improvement, and monetary benefit

  • Govindasamy Kadirvel
  • Arumugam Kumaresan
  • Anubrata Das
  • Kamal Malla Bujarbaruah
  • Venkatasamy Venkatasubramanian
  • Shishom Vanao Ngachan
Regular Articles


The study investigated the success rate, genetic improvement, and monetary benefit of artificial insemination (AI) technology in smallholder backyard pig production system. The pig production system was studied, and performance of nondescript and crossbred pigs under the traditional system was evaluated. Litter size and growth rate of crossbred pig was significantly (P < 0.05) higher compared to the nondescript pigs. Non-availability of superior germplasm to produce crossbred pigs and high mating cost were the major constraints observed in the study in addition to indiscriminate mating and non-availability of breeding boar. For genetic improvement of nondescript local pigs and to produce crossbred pigs, AI delivery mechanism was developed in participatory mode including farmers, village leaders, and key persons in 36 villages. The information system was designed in such a way that AI was carried out at the doorstep of the farmer upon request. A total of 167 estrus sow/gilts were artificially inseminated, and a farrowing rate of 78.44 % was obtained with a mean litter size of 7.86 ± 0.65 following AI, which did not differ significantly from natural service. However, the growth rate of crossbred piglets obtained through AI was significantly higher than the growth rate of piglets born out of natural service. The tribal farmers were benefited by AI in several ways: (1) timely availability of superior germplasm to produce crossbred piglets; (2) saved the mating cost of INR 1,000–1,200 and transport of cost (INR 300–400) of female to the boar premises and (3) controlled mating to prevent inbreeding. The present study clearly demonstrates the feasibility and potential benefit of AI technique to smallholder backyard pig production system in tribal rural areas. In addition to genetic improvement of nondescript local pigs, this technology can help in overcoming breeding constraints in smallholder backyard pig production for increasing productivity.


Smallholder pig production Artificial insemination Farrowing rate Genetic improvement Benefits 


  1. Am-in N, Tantasuparuk, W. and Techakumphu, M., 2010. Comparison of artificial insemination with natural mating on smallholder farms in Thailand, and the effects of boar stimulation and distance of semen delivery on sow reproductive performance, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42, 921–924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bujarbaruah, K.M., 2005. Step towards increasing livestock production in North Eastern Region of India. Research Bulletin no: 45, Published by ICAR Research Complex for NEH region, Meghalaya, India.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, R.G., Hancock, J.L. and Rothschild, L., 1953. Counting live and dead bull spermatozoa, Journal of Experimental Biology, 30, 44.Google Scholar
  4. Haugana, T., Reksen, O., Grohn, Y.T., Gaustad, A. H. and Hofma, P. P., 2005. A retrospective study on effects of storage time of liquid boar semen on reproductive performance in Norwegian swine, Theriogenology, 64, 891–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson, R.K., 1981. Crossbreeding of swine: experimental results. Journal of Animal Science, 52, 906-923.Google Scholar
  6. Kadirvel, G., Kumaresan, A., Bujarbaruah, K.M., Basumatary, R., Bardoloi, R.K., Anubrata Das and Ngachan, S.V., 2010. Artificial Insemination in pig: technology assessment and impact analysis in the field conditions. Research Bulletin No: 72, Published by ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Meghalaya, India.Google Scholar
  7. Kagira, J.M., Kanyari, P.W.N., Maingi, N., Githigia, S.M., Ngana, J.C and Karuga, J.W., 2010. Characteristics of the smallholder free-range pig production system in Western Kenya, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42, 865-873.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumaresan, A., Bujarbaruah, K.M., Pathak, K.A., Das, A., Bardoloi, R.K., 2009. Integrated resource-driven pig production systems in a mountainous area of Northeast India: production practices and pig performance, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 41, 1187-1196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumaresan, A., Bujarbaruah, K.M., Kadirvel, G., Ghargharia, G., Sarma, R.G., Goswami, J., Basumatarya, R., Kavitha, P. and Bardoloi, R.K., 2010. Early sexual maturity in local boars of Northeastern India: Age-related changes in testicular growth, epididymal sperm characteristics and peripheral testosterone levels, Theriogenology, 75, 687-695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kunavongkrit, A. and Heard, T.W., 2000. Pig reproduction in south east Asia, Animal Reproductive Science, 60/61, 527–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lamberson, W.R., Safranski, T.J., 2000. A model for economic comparison of swine insemination programs, Theriogenology, 54, 799 – 807.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lemke, U and Zarate, A.V., 2008. Dynamics and developmental trends of smallholder pig production system in North Vietnam. Agricultural System, 96, 207-223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lemke, U., Emrich, K., Kaufmann, B., Thuy, L. T., Valle and Zarate, A., 2006. Evaluation of smallholder pig production systems in North Vietnam. Pig production management and pig performances, Livestock Science, 105, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mutua, F.K., Dewey, C., Arimi, S., Ogara, W., Levy, M. and Schelling, E., 2012. A description of local pig feeding systems in village smallholder farms of Western Kenya, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44, 1157–1162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Phengsavanh, P., Ogle1, B., Stür, W., Frankow-Lindberg, B.E. and Lindberg, J.E., 2011 Smallholder Pig Rearing Systems in Northern Lao PDR, Asian-Australian Journal Animal Science, 24, 867–874.Google Scholar
  16. Pursel,V.G. and Johnson, L.A., 1975. Freezing of boar spermatozoa: Fertilizing capacity with concentrated semen and a new thawing procedure. Journal of Animal Science, 40, 92-102.Google Scholar
  17. Salisbury, G. W., VanDemark, N. K. and Lodge, J. R., 1985. Artificial insemination of cattle (2nd edn.) CBS publishers and distributors, 485, Shahdara, Delhi.Google Scholar
  18. Sellier, P., 1976. The basis of crossbreeding in pigs: A review, Livestock Production Science, 3, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Visalvethaya, W., Tantasuparuk, W. and Techakumphu, M., 2010. The development of a model for artificial insemination by backyard pig farmers in Thailand, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43, 787-793.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Govindasamy Kadirvel
    • 1
  • Arumugam Kumaresan
    • 2
  • Anubrata Das
    • 3
  • Kamal Malla Bujarbaruah
    • 4
  • Venkatasamy Venkatasubramanian
    • 5
  • Shishom Vanao Ngachan
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Animal ProductionICAR Research Complex for NEH RegionUmiamIndia
  2. 2.Cattle Yard, LPM SectionNational Dairy Research InstituteKarnalIndia
  3. 3.National Research Centre on PigICARGuwahatiIndia
  4. 4.Assam Agricultural UniversityAssamIndia
  5. 5.ICARNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations