Development and delivery of evidence-based messages to reduce the risk of zoonoses in Nairobi, Kenya
- 306 Downloads
This paper describes a trans-disciplinary process of co-generating and disseminating evidence-based messages for reducing the risk from cryptosporidiosis and other zoonoses in an urban community in Nairobi. Research findings about disease prevalence, risk factors and observed risky and risk-mitigating practices were analysed by a team comprising researchers, community members and local policy- and decision-makers. Using participatory planning, multiple strategies were developed for disseminating key information. We identified five vulnerable groups at higher risk of exposure to cryptosporidiosis and other cattle zoonoses with similar transmission pathways (women, children, elderly people, immunosuppressed people and male farm workers). For each group, targeted messages were developed. Good practices already in use, as were also practices as practices to improve environmental conditions. These messages were disseminated through printed material, in a workshop, through community campaigners and also an edutainment soap opera episode broadcast on Kenyan television. In conclusion, a participatory and trans-disciplinary process can help transform the findings of research into messages that are targeted, attractive and understandable.
KeywordsParticipatory Risk mitigation Zoonoses Ecohealth
The authors wish to thank the International Research Development Centre for funding this work under the grant number 103075-001. We also thank all the members of the Dagoretti agricultural and livestock extension team and all the members of the Dagoretti community, who took part in this study.
- Kange’the, E.K., McDermott, B., M’ibui, G.M., Randolph, T.F., and Langat, A.K., 2007. Investigation into the prevalence of bovine cryptosporidiosis among small-holder dairy households in Dagoretti Division, Nairobi, Kenya, East African Medical Journal, 84 (Supplement), S76-S82.Google Scholar
- Kristjanson, P., Reid, R., Dickson, N., Clark, W., Romney, D, Puskur, R., MacMillan, S. and Grace, D., 2009. Linking research knowledge with action: Lessons from sustainable development livestock projects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106(13), 5047–5052.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lebel, J., (2003). In Focus: Health. An Ecosystem Approach, (International Development Research Centre, Ottawa).Google Scholar
- Marsh, D.R., Schroeder, D.G., Dearden, K.A., Sternin, J., Sternin, M., 2004. The power of positive deviance, British Medical Journal, 13, 329(7457), 1177–9.Google Scholar
- Mediae, 2010. How Kenyans rate Makutano junction, http://www.mediae.org/makutano_junction_research, consulted on line 15th July 2010
- Mougeot, L., 2006. Growing Better Cities: Urban Agriculture for Sustainable Development, (International Development Research Centre, Ottawa).Google Scholar
- Omore, A., Cheng’ole, J.M., Islam, F., Nurah, G., Khan, M.I., Staal, S.J. and Dugdill B.T., 2004. Employment generation through small scale dairy marketing and processing: Experiences in Kenya, Bangladesh and Ghana, (ILRI, Kenya and FAO Animal Production Division, Rome). http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y4860e/y4860e00.htm Google Scholar
- Rogers, E.M., 1983. Diffusion of Innovations, (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar