Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 44, Issue 7, pp 1459–1468 | Cite as

Feed inventory and smallholder farmers’ perceived causes of feed shortage for dairy cattle in Gisagara District, Rwanda

  • Moses Kamanzi
  • Cletos MapiyeEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

A survey was conducted to indentify dairy cattle feed resources and smallholder farmers’ perceived causes of feed shortage in the central and southern plateaus of Gisagara District, Rwanda. Data were obtained by interviewing 120 smallholder milk producers using structured questionnaires and through direct observations made during transect walks. In all the surveyed areas, rangelands (mean rank = 1.12), crop residues (1.21), improved grasses (2.34), browse (3.23) and herbaceous (4.84) legumes were ranked as the main feed resources. Pennisetum purpureum (95% of the respondents), Leucaena diversifolia (60%) and Calliandra calothyrsus (40%) were the most cultivated fodders in all the plateaus. The dominant crop residue was Zea mays stover (65% of the farmers) in the surveyed areas. In both plateaus, land scarcity was ranked (mean rank = 1.45) as the most important cause of feed shortage followed by inadequacy of forage planting material (2.72) and lack of knowledge on forage production and utilisation (3.02). To ensure sustainable viability of smallholder dairying in densely populated highlands, screening and evaluation of high-yielding and easily propagated pastures, incorporation of forages into cropping systems, value addition of low quality roughages and training farmers on forage production and utilisation should be prioritised.

Keywords

Browse legumes Crop residues Land scarcity Napier grass Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Authors are indebted to the farmers in Gisagara District for their participation in the current study.

References

  1. Devendra, C., Sevilla, C.C., 2002. Availability and use of feed resources in crop–animal systems in Asia. Agricultural Systems, 71, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), 2000. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2000 Year book. Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  3. Franzel, S., 1999. Socio-economic factors affecting the adoption potential of improved tree fallows in Africa. Agroforestry Systems, 47, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Franzel, S., Wambugu, C., Arimi, H., Stewart, J., 2008. Fodder shrubs for improving livestock productivity and sustainable land management in East Africa. In: World Bank, Sustainable Land Management Source book, Agriculture and Rural Development Department, Washington, DC, 88–94.Google Scholar
  5. Giller, K. E., 2001. Nitrogen fixation in the Tropical Systems 2nd Edition. CABI, Wallingford, UK. pp. 150–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kabirizi, J., Turinawe, A., Ebiyau, G., Kigongo, J., Akwanga, D., Nangooti, N., 2009. Impact of improved forage technologies on profitability of dairy enterprise and factors affecting utilisation of technologies. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, 9,745 749.Google Scholar
  7. Kiptot, E., Franzel, S., Hebinck P., Richards, P., 2006. Sharing seed and knowledge: farmer to farmer dissemination of agroforestry technologies in western Kenya. Agroforestry Systems, 68, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lukuyu, B. A., Kitalyi, A., Franzel, S., Duncan, A., Baltenweck, I., 2009. Constraints and options to enhancing production of high quality feeds in dairy production in Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda, ICRAF Working Paper no. 95, World Agroforestry Centre. Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  9. Lukuyu, B., Franzel, S., Ongadi, P.M., Duncan A. J., 2011. Livestock feed resources: Current production and management practices in central and northern rift valley provinces of Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 23 (5).Google Scholar
  10. Mapekula, M., Chimonyo, M., Mapiye, C., Dzama, K. 2010. Milk utilization patterns in the low-input production systems in South Africa. Tropical Animal Health and production, 42, 1413–1419.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mapiye, C., Foti, R., Mwale, M., Chikumba, N., Poshiwa, X., Chivuraise, C., Mupangwa, J.F., 2006b. Constraints to adoption of forage and browse legumes by smallholder dairy farmers in Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 18 (12).Google Scholar
  12. Mapiye, C., Mupangwa, J. F., Mugabe, P. H., Chikumba, N., Poshiwa, X., Foti, R., 2006a. A review of forage legume research for rangeland improvement in Zimbabwe. Tropical Grasslands, 40, 145–149.Google Scholar
  13. Ministry of Agriculture (MINAGRI), 2006. Ministry of Agriculture Republic of Rwanda, Livestock production, Annual report, pp. 1–75.Google Scholar
  14. Ministry of Agriculture (MINAGRI), 2008. Evaluation of PAPSTA Service Providers October 2008. Draft report, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Local Government (MINLOC), 2010. Province, District and Sector information from MINLOC, Rwanda. pp.1–60.Google Scholar
  16. Mullins, G., Wahome, L., Tsangari, P., Maarse, L., 1996. Impacts of intensive dairy production on smallholder farm women in coastal Kenya. Human Ecology, 24 (2), 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mupangwa, J. F., Uwimana, G, Nireba, R.T., 2010. Incorporation of Mucuna pruriens in diets of lactating cows—effect on milk yield and composition. A paper presented at the 3rd International Scientific Research Conference held at the National University of Rwanda from 2 to 4 November 2010. Book of abstracts, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  18. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR), 2010. National Agricultural Survey 2008, Nationals Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. pp. 1–78.Google Scholar
  19. Ngongoni, N. T., Mapiye, C., Mwale, M., Mupeta, B., Chimonyo, M., 2007. Potential of farm-produced crop residues as protein sources for small-medium yielding dairy cows. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(7), 309–317.Google Scholar
  20. Paterson, R.T., Karanja, G.M., Roothaert, R., Nyaata, Z., Kariuki, I.W., 1998. A review of tree fodder production and utilization within smallholder agroforestry systems in Kenya. Agroforestry Systems, 41, 181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Place, F., Roothaert, R., Maina, L., Franzel, S., Sinja, J., Wanjiku, J., 2009. The impact of fodder shrubs on milk production and income among smallholder dairy farmers in East Africa and the role of research undertaken by the World Agroforestry Centre, Occasional Paper 12, World Agroforestry Centre. Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  22. Statistical Analytical Systems Institute (SAS) (2006). SAS Guide for Personal Computers. Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Sundstøl, F., 1993. Urinary urea and other urinary compounds as feed supplements. In Sundstøl F and Owen E (eds.) Urine, a wasted, renewable natural resource. NORAGRIC Occasional Papers Series C. Development and Environment, 12, 36–41.Google Scholar
  24. Tassew, A., Seifu, E., 2009. Smallholder Dairy Production System and Emergence of Dairy Cooperatives in Bahir Dar Zuria and Mecha Woredas, Northwestern Ethiopia. World Journal of Dairy and Food Sciences, 4 (2), 185–192.Google Scholar
  25. Techno-serve, 2008. The Dairy Value Chain in Rwanda: Heifer International, 2008, ILRI, Techno-Serve, ABS and World Agro-Forestry Centre, East Africa Dairy Development Program.Google Scholar
  26. Teklu, B., Negesse, T., Angassa, A., 2011. Effect of farming systems on livestock feed resources and feeding systems in Benishangul-Gumuz region, western Ethiopia. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 1 (1), 20–28.Google Scholar
  27. Wambugu, C., 2003. Adoption of forage legumes: the case of Desmodium intortum and Calliandra calothyrsus in central Kenya. Tropical Grasslands, 37, 227–238.Google Scholar
  28. Wambugu, C., Place, F., Franzel, S., 2011. Research, development and scaling-up the adoption of fodder shrub innovations in East Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9 (1), 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yila, O.M., Thapa, G.B., 2008. Adoption of agricultural land management technologies by smallholder farmers in the Jos Plateau, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 6 (4), 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal ProductionNational University of RwandaButareRwanda

Personalised recommendations