Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 44, Issue 7, pp 1395–1401 | Cite as

Seasonal variation in time budgets and milk yield for Jersey, Friesland and crossbred cows raised in a pasture-based system

  • Madodana S. Dodzi
  • Voster MuchenjeEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

The time budgets and daily milk yield of Jersey and Friesland cows and their crosses were compared in a pasture-based system by recording the time spent grazing, drinking, lying, standing and walking in four seasons of the year (cool–dry, hot–dry, hot–wet and post-rainy). Observations were made from 0800 to 1400 hours on seven cows per breed. Seven observers monitored the cows at 10-min intervals for 6 h using stop watches. Time spent standing was higher (P < 0.05) for Friesland compared to Jersey cows and the crossbred cows during the hot–wet season. Time spent walking differed among the three genotypes with the Jersey spending more time (P < 0.05) in both hot–wet and cool–dry seasons. No differences were noted on time spent lying down (P > 0.05) across the genotypes in the hot–wet season. In the cool–dry season, differences in time spent grazing (P < 0.05) were noted with the Jersey cows spending more time. The Friesland and the crossbred spent more time lying down (P < 0.05) than the Jersey cows in the cool–dry season. No time differences were noted for time spent standing (P > 0.05) in the same season. The Jersey cows spent the longest time walking (P < 0.05) during the cool–dry period. There were seasonal differences in time spent in all activities (P < 0.05). Time spent on grazing was longest in post-rainy season and lowest in hot–wet season. Differences were observed in the time spent lying down (P < 0.05). The longest period was observed in the hot–dry season and lowest in the hot–wet season. Daily milk yield varied (P < 0.05) with breed with the Friesland and Jersey producing higher yields than the crosses. The highest amount was produced in hot–dry and the least in hot–wet season. Milk yield and lying down were positively correlated (P < 0.05) in Jersey and Friesland cows. Standing was negatively correlated with milk yield (P < 0.05) in both Friesland and Jersey cows. No significant relationship was observed for the crossbred cows. It was concluded that the genotypes show different levels of sensitivity to seasons and that a relationship exists between milk yield and time budgets.

Keywords

Season Genotypes Feeding behaviour Milk yield Temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the students in the Department of Livestock and Pasture Science for their assistance in carrying out the data collection and Govan Mbeki Research and Development Centre for financial assistance.

References

  1. Abrahamse, P.A., Dijkstra, J., Vlaeminck, B. and Tamminga S., 2008. Frequent allocation of rotationally grazed dairy cows changes grazing behaviour and improves productivity, Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 2033–2045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agreil, C. and Meuret, M. 2004. An improved method for quantifying intake rate and ingestive behaviour of ruminants in diverse and variable habitats using direct observation, Small Ruminant Research, 54, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aikman, P.C., Reynolds, C.K. and Beever, D.E., 2008. Diet digestibility, rate of passage, and eating and rumination behaviour of Jersey and Holstein cows, Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 1103–1114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakare, A.G. and Chimonyo, M., 2010. Seasonal variation in time spent foraging by indigenous goat genotypes in semi-arid ranged lands in South Africa, Livestock Science 135, 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakare, A.G. and Chimonyo, M. 2011. Variation in plant preferences of indigenous goats in False Thornveld rangeland in South Africa, Livestock Science 139, 206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumgard, L.H., Wheelock, J.B., Shwartz, G., O’Brien, M., Van Baale, M.J., Collier, R.J., Rhoads, M.L. and Rhoads, R.P., 2006. Effects of heat stress on nutritional requirements of lactating dairy cattle. Proceeding of the 5th Annual Arizona Dairy Production conference AZ- 8.Google Scholar
  7. Cant, J.P., Trout, D.R., Qiao, F. and Purdie, N.G., 2002. Milk synthetic response of bovine mammary gland to increase in the local concentration of arterial glucose, Journal of Dairy Science, 85, 494–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodzi, M.S. and Muchenje, V. 2011. Avoidance-related behavioural variables and their relationship to milk yield in pasture-based dairy cows, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 133, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dziba L.E., Scoging, P.F., Gordon, I.G. and Raats, J.G., 2003. Effects of season and breed on browse species intake rates and diet selection by goats in the False Thornveld of Eastern Cape, South Africa. Small Ruminant Research, 47, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gomez, A. and Cook N.B., 2010. Time budget of lactating dairy cattle in commercial freestall. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5772–5781.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huber, R., Baumug, R., Wurzinger, M., Semambo, D., Mwai, O. and Winckler, C., 2007. Grazing, social and comfort behaviour of Ankole and crossbred (Ankole X Holstein) heifers on pasture in south western Uganda, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 12, 223–234.Google Scholar
  12. Jensen, M.B., Pedersen, L.J. and Munksgaard, L., 2005. The effect of reward duration on demand functions for rest in dairy heifers and lying requirements as measured by demand functions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 90, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kadzere, C.T., Murphy, M.R., Silanikove, N. and Maltz, E., 2002. Heat stress in lactating dairy cows; a review. Livestock Production Science, 77, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Malechek, J.C., and Smith, B.M., 1976. Behavior of range cows in response to winter weather. Journal of Range Management, 29, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Munksgaard, L., Jensen, M.B., Pedersen, L.J., Hansen, S.W, and Matthews, L., 2005. Quantifying behavioural priorities—effects of time constraints on behavior of dairy cows, Bos taurus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 92, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Driscoll, K., Boyle, L. and Honlon, L., 2009. The effect of breed and housing system on dairy cow feeding and lying behavior, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116, 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Driscoll, K., O’Brien, B., Gleeson, D. and Boyle, L., 2010. Milking frequency and nutritional level affect grazing behaviour of dairy cows: a case study, Applied animal Behaviour science 122, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Overton, M.W., Sischo, W. M., Temple, G.D. and Moore, D.A., 2002. Using time-lapse video photography to assess dairy cattle lying behavior in a free-stall barn, Journal of Dairy Science, 85, 2407–2413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Provenza, F.D., Villalba, J.J., Dziba, L E., Atwood, S.B. and Banner, R.E., 2003. Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity, Small Ruminant Research, 49, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prendiville, R., Lewis, E., Pierce, K.M. and Buckley, F., 2010. A comparative grazing behaviour of lactating Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, and Jersey × Holstein-Friesian dairy cows and its association with intake capacity and production efficiency, Journal of Dairy Science 93, 764–774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Redbo, I., Ehrlemark, A. and Redbo-Torstensson, P., 2001. Behavioural responses to climatic demands of dairy heifers housed outdoors. Journal of Animal Science, 81, 9–15.Google Scholar
  22. SAS 2003. SAS/STAT®Software Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  23. Schrama, J.W., Arieli, A., Brandsma, H.A., Luiting, P. and Verstegen, M.W.A., 1993. Thermal requirements of young calves during standing and lying. Journal of Animal Science, 71, 3285–3292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schutz, K.E., Rogers, A.R., Cox, N.R. and Tucker, C.B., 2008. Dairy cows prefer shade that offers greater protection against solar radiation in summer: shade use, behaviour, and body temperature, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tapki, I. and Sahin, A., 2006. Comparison of the thermoregulatory behaviors of low and high producing dairy cows in a hot environment, Applied Animal Behavior Science, 99, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tucker, C.B., Rogers, A. R., Verkerk, G.A., Kendall, P.E., Webster, J.R. and Matthews, L.R., 2006. Effects of shelter and body condition and physiology of dairy cattle in winter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 105, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tucker, C.B., Rogers, A.R. and Schütz, K.E., 2008. Effect of solar radiation on dairy cattle behavior, use of shade and body temperature in a pasture-based system, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 109, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tucker, C.B., Weary, D.M., Rushen, J. and de Passillé, A.M., 2004. Designing better environments for cattle to rest, Journal of Advances in Dairy Technology, 16, 39–53.Google Scholar
  29. Uzal, S. and Ugurlu, N., 2010a. The effects of seasons on time budget and area usage of animals in open loose dairy housing, Journal of Animal and veterinary Advances, 9, 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Uzal, S. and Ugurlu, N., 2010b. The dairy cattle behaviours and time budget and barn area usage in freestall housing. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zahner, M., Schrader, L., Hauser, R., Keck, M., Langhans, W. and Wechsler, B., 2004. The influence of climatic conditions on physiological and behavioural parameters in dairy cows kept in open stables, Animal Science, 78, 139–147.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Livestock and Pasture Sciences, Faculty of Science and AgricultureUniversity of Fort HareAliceSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations