Advertisement

Tropical Animal Health and Production

, Volume 44, Issue 7, pp 1375–1381 | Cite as

Assessment of Grewia oppositifolia leaves as crude protein supplement to low-quality forage diets of sheep

  • Nazir Ahmad KhanEmail author
  • Ghulam Habib
Original Research

Abstract

In the tropical arid and semi-arid regions of many developing countries, sheep are predominantly grazed on low-quality pastures and stall-fed on crop residues. This study evaluated the potential of Grewia oppositifolia tree leaves as crude protein (CP) supplement to the low-quality diets of sheep in comparison with cottonseed cake (CSC). Changes in the chemical composition of the leaves with progressive maturation (December to March) were studied. The leaves maintained a high CP content (>164 g/kg dry matter (DM)) during the prolonged maturation in the winter feed scarcity period. The leaves were rich in Ca (41 g/kg DM) and K (89 g/kg DM). The rate of degradation and effective degradability of CP were consistently higher (P < 0.001) in CSC than in G. oppositifolia. A balance trial in a 4 × 4 Latin square design with four mature Ramghani wethers showed that DM intake, DM and CP digestibility, and N retention did not differ with the substitution of CSC with G. oppositifolia leaves, as a supplement to a basal diet of sorghum hay. Body weight (BW) gain and wool yield responses to the supplements were examined with 36 lambs (27 ± 3 kg BW; age 11 ± 1 months) for 15 weeks. The lambs were only grazed on local pasture (control group) or supplemented with CSC, G. oppositifolia leaves, and their mixture on iso-N basis. Addition of the supplements increased (P < 0.05) BW gain and wool yield, and the leaves were as effective as CSC. These results demonstrated that G. oppositifolia leaves provide good quality green fodder during the prolonged winter feed scarcity period, and that the leaves can be efficiently utilized as a CP supplement to the low-quality diets of sheep.

Keywords

Grewia oppositifolia Tree leaves Sheep Rumen degradability N balance Weight gain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the staff of the Livestock Experimental Station Jaba and the laboratory of Animal Nutrition Group of Agricultural University Peshawar for technical assistance. The research was conducted under the Agriculture Linkages Program financed by Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad. The authors are highly indebted to Dr. J. W. Cone and S. A. Khan for reading the manuscript and Dr. Ibrar ul Hussain for facilitating the experimental trials.

References

  1. ACO, 2006. Agricultural Census Organization, Livestock Census, Ministry of Economic Affair and Statistics, Lahore, Pakistan pp. XV–XVI.Google Scholar
  2. Alem, M., Tamir, B., Kurtu, M.Y., 2010. Feed utilisation of Ethiopian Highland lambs on a basal diet of Eleucine coracana straw and supplemented with variously sourced protein mixed with wheat bran, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43, 115–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AOAC, 1996. Official Method of Analysis, 16th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  4. Bakshi, M.P.S., Wadhwa, M., 2004. Evaluation of forest tree leaves of semi-hilly arid region as livestock feed, Asian-Australasian Journal Animal Science, 17, 777–783.Google Scholar
  5. Bhatta, R., Vaithiyanathan, S., Singh, N.P., Shnide, A.K., Verma, D.L., 2005. Effect of feeding tree leaves as supplement on nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation pattern in sheep grazing semi-arid range of India, Small Ruminant Research, 60, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gul, S., Safdar, M., 2009. Proximate Composition and Mineral Analysis of Cinnamon, Pakisatan Journal of Nutrition, 8, 1456–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Habib, G., 2005. Efficient utilization of local feed resources for sustainable increase in livestock production, final ALP Report, Animal Nutrition Department, NWFP Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  8. Habib, G., Siddiqui, M.M., Mian, F.H., Jabbar, J., Khan, F., 2001. Effect of protein supplements of varying degradability on growth rate, wool yield and wool quality in grazing lambs, Small Ruminant Research, 41, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Habib, G., Raza, M., Saleem, M., 2008. Effect of tree leaves with or without urea as a feed supplement on nutrient digestion and nitrogen balance in sheep, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 144, 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hussain, F., Durrani, M.J., 2007. Forage productivity of arid temperate harboi rangeland, Kalat, Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39, 1455–1470.Google Scholar
  11. Khan, B.B., Iqbal, A., Mustafa, M.I., 2003. Sheep and goat production. Department of Livestock Management University of Agriculture Faisalabad 1, pp. 2–10.Google Scholar
  12. Khan, N.A., Habib, G., Ullah, G., 2009. Chemical composition, rumen degradability, protein utilization and lactation response to selected tree leaves as substitute of cottonseed cake in the diet of dairy goats, Animal Feed Science and Technology. 154, 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. NRC, 2007. National Research Council, Nutrient Requirements of small ruminants, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Ondiek, J.O., Abdulrazak, S.A., Njoka, E.N., 2010. Chemical and mineral composition, in-vitro gas production, in-sacco degradation of selected indigenous Kenyan browses, Livestock Research for Rural Development, 22, 2.Google Scholar
  15. Ørskov, E.R., McDonald, 1979. The estimation of dry matter degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to the rate of passage, Journal Agriculture Science, 92, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Prasad, C.S., Gowda, N. K. S., Ramana, J. V., 2001. Feeding strategies to enhance animal productivity. In: Emerging Nutritional Technologies for Sustainable Animal Production and Environmental Protection. K. K. Singhal and S. N. Rai (eds), proceedings of Xth Animal Nutrition Conference in Karnal, India, pp. 23–45.Google Scholar
  17. Salem, A.Z.M., Salem, M.Z.M., El-Adawy, M.M., Robinson, P.H., 2006. Nutritive evaluation of some browse tree foliages during the dry season: secondary compounds, feed intake and in vivo digestibility in sheep and goats, Animal Feed Science Technology, 127, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. SAS®, 2003. Statistical Analysis System, Version 9.1.3, service pack 4. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  19. Solomen, M.K., Peterson, J., Tegegne, A., 2004. Effect of supplementing tef straw with multipurpose tree leaves, sole or in mixture or wheat bran on feed intake and blood composition in Menz sheep, Livestock Production Science, 89, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sultan, J.I., Inam Ur, R., Nawaz, H., Yaqoob, M., Javed, I., 2008a. Nutritional evaluation of fodder tree leaves of northern grasslands of Pakistan, Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40, 2503–2512.Google Scholar
  21. Sultan, J.I., Inam Ur, R., Yaqoob, M., Nawaz, H., Hameed, M., 2008b. Nutritive value of free rangeland grasses of northern grasslands of Pakistan, Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40, 249–258.Google Scholar
  22. Van Soest, P. J., 1973. Collaborative study of acid detergent fibre and lignin, Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 56, 781–784.Google Scholar
  23. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition, Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Animal Nutrition Group, Department of Animal SciencesWageningen UniversityWageningenthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Animal NutritionAgricultural University PeshawarPeshawarPakistan

Personalised recommendations