Skip to main content

Production objectives and breeding goals of Sahiwal cattle keepers in Kenya and implications for a breeding programme

Tropical Animal Health and Production volume 44, pages 519–530 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

The Sahiwal breed has been used for upgrading the East African Zebu (EAZ) for improved milk production and growth performance in the southern rangelands of Kenya. Main users of this breed are Maasai pastoralists. Until now, there has been no deliberate effort to understand why these pastoralists specifically prefer to keep Sahiwal genetic resources as well as which traits are considered important by them and what is the underlying reason for this. However, this information is regarded vital for further development of the breed. A survey was conducted between May and October 2009 among Maasai pastoralists in Kajiado and Narok counties in the Southern part of Kenya, and private ranches and government farms to identify production objectives and breeding goals of Sahiwal cattle producers. Sahiwal genetic resources were mainly kept for domestic milk production and for revenue generation through milk sales and live animals. To a limited extent, they were kept for breeding and also for multiple objectives that included insurance against risks and social functions. Production aims were influenced to varying extents by various household and farmer characteristics. Sahiwal cattle and their crosses were generally perceived to be better with respect to productive traits and fertility traits when compared to the EAZ. However, the EAZ was rated higher with respect to adaptation traits. The breeding objective traits of primary importance were high milk yield and big body size, good reproductive efficiency and relatively good adaptation to local production conditions. Performance and functional traits are important breeding goals that play a major role in fulfilling the multiple production objectives. This forms the basis for the optimisation of a breeding programme for sustainable utilisation to meet the needs of Sahiwal cattle producers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Ilatsia, E. D., Muasya, T. K., Muhuyi, W. B. and Kahi, A. K., 2007. Genetic and phenotypic parameters and annual trends for milk production and fertility traits of the Sahiwal cattle in semi arid Kenya. Tropical Animal Health Production, 39: 37–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kosgey, I.S., Rowlands, G.L., Van Arendonk, J.A.M., and Baker, R.L., 2008. Small ruminant production in smallholder and pastoral/extensive farming systems in Kenya. Small Ruminant Research, 77, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legesse, G., Abebe G., Siegmund-Schultze, M. and Valle Zárate, A., 2008. Small ruminant production in two mixed-farming system of southern Ethiopia: status and prospects for improvement. Experimental Agriculture, 44, 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyn, K. and Wilkins, J.V., 1974. Breeding for milk in Kenya, with particular reference to the Sahiwal stud. World Animal Review, 11, 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOLFD, 2006. Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Development, Division of Animal Production, Annual Report, Kajiado and Narok Districts, Nairobi, Kenya.

  • MONPD, 2005. Ministry of Planning and National Development, Kajiado District Strategic Plan, 2005 to 2010, National Coordinating Agency for Population and Development, Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhuyi, W.B., 1997. A Comparison of the Productivity of Kenya Sahiwal and their Crosses in Large Scale Dairy Dual Purpose and Beef Production Systems. (PhD thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya).

  • Muhuyi, W. B., Lokwaleput, I., Ole Sinkeet. and Lukibisi, F. B., 2000. On-farm performance of Sahiwal × Zebu crossbreds from birth to 12 months of age in Trans Mara. In. Proceedings of the 7th Kenya Agricultural Research Institute Biennual Scientific Conference and Research Week, Nairobi, Kenya, 57.

  • Musa, L,M-A., Peters, K.J. and Ahmed, A. M-K., 2006. On farm characterisation of Butana and Kenana cattle breed production systems in Sudan. Livestock Production for Rural Development, Volume 18, Article No. 177. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/12/musa18177.htm accessed 16/06/2010

  • Mwacharo, J.M. and Drucker, A.G., 2005. Production objectives and management strategies of livestock keepers in South-East Kenya: Implications for breeding programme. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 37, 635–652.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ng'ethe, J.C., 1992. Group ranch concept and practice in Kenya with special emphasis on Kajiado District. Kategile J A and Mubi S (eds). Future of livestock industries in East and southern Africa. Proceedings of a workshop held at Kadoma Ranch Hotel, Zimbabwe, 20–23 July 1992. ILCA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 227 pp.

  • Ouma, E., Abdulai, A. and Drucker, A., 2007. Measuring heterogeneous preferences for cattle traits among cattle-keeping households in East Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89, 1005–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarpa, R., Ruto, E.S.K., Kristjanson, P., Radeny, M, Drucker, A. G. and Rege, J.E.O., 2003. Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: an empirical comparison of stated and revealed preferences value estimates. Ecological Economics 45, 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steglich, M. and Peters, K.J., 2002. Agro pastoralists' trait preferences in N'Dama cattle: Participatory methods to assess breeding objectives. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, August 19–23, 2002, Montpellier, France, Communication No. 25–04.

  • Wurzinger, M., Ndumu, D., Baumung, R., Drucker, A., Okeyo, A.M., Semambo, D.K., Byamumgu, N. and Sölkner, J., 2006. Comparison of production systems and selection criteria of Ankole cattle by breeders in Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 38: 571–581.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funds from the Kenya Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (KASAL) project through the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI). We are also grateful to the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for financial support. We greatly acknowledge the support of the personnel of the Ministry of Livestock Development and the field enumerators for successful logistical support. Cooperation of pastoralists and ranch managers is highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Animal Production in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Hohenheim, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany

    Evans D. Ilatsia, Regina Roessler & Valle Zárate

  2. Institute of Crop Science, Department of Bioinformatics, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany

    Hans-Peter Piepho

  3. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, National Animal Husbandry Research Centre, P. O. Box 25, 20117, Naivasha, Kenya

    Evans D. Ilatsia

  4. Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Egerton University, P. O. Box 536, 20115, Egerton, Kenya

    Alexander K. Kahi

Authors
  1. Evans D. Ilatsia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Regina Roessler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander K. Kahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hans-Peter Piepho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Valle Zárate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evans D. Ilatsia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ilatsia, E.D., Roessler, R., Kahi, A.K. et al. Production objectives and breeding goals of Sahiwal cattle keepers in Kenya and implications for a breeding programme. Trop Anim Health Prod 44, 519–530 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9928-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9928-8

Keywords

  • Breeding goals
  • Breeding programme
  • Sahiwal cattle
  • Production objectives