Skip to main content
Log in

The role of working equines to livelihoods in current day campesino hill-slope communities in central Mexico

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small-holder campesino agriculture is based on the diversified use of resources and off-farm work. Working equines have a multifunctional character and sustain the diversification of livelihoods having different values as assets or providing services. The objective was to identify the role of working equines in current diversification strategies in the livelihoods of campesino families in a hill-slope community in central Mexico within livelihoods analysis. Thirty-one variables related to ownership and use of working equines were analysed by cluster analysis and descriptive statistics contrasting the presence of equines in the diversification of livelihoods. Four groups were identified, determined mainly by age of farmer and number of family members who utilise equines. Results show these systems diversify in response to conditions of risk or to take advantage of opportunities, such that a balance is reached by resorting to off-farm activities without the total loss of components of the farming system. Two main situations were found in relation to working equines: the disappearance and change of functions of the large equines (mules), and the adaptation of small equines (donkeys) to the new conditions. It is concluded that there is a process of adaptation in hill-slope campesino farms such that large equines are less present in farms that have moved towards more diversification, but are kept in those farms less diversified. The use of equines for draught force in agricultural production and as pack animals continues, as is the presence of small livestock (sheep and poultry) irrespective of the context of the farm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aganga, A.A. and Tsopito, C.M., 2004. Donkey power technology in the Gaborone Region. In: P. Starkey and D. Fielding (eds), Donkeys, people and development: web version, (ATNESA Publications: http://www.atnesa.org/donkeyspeopledevelopment.htm).

  • Arriaga - Jordán, C.M., Pedraza - Fuentes, A.M., Nava - Bernal, E.G., Chávez - Mejía, M.C. and Castelán - Ortega, O.A., 2005a. Livestock agrodiversity of mazahua small-holder campesino systems in the highlands of central Mexico, Human Ecology, 33, 821 – 845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arriaga-Jordán, C.M., Pedraza-Fuentes, A.M., Velazquez-Beltrán, L.G., Nava-Bernal, E.G. and Chavez-Mejia, M.C., 2005b. Economic contribution of draught animals to Mazahua smallholder campesino farming systems in the highlands of Central Mexico. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 37, 589–597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, G.S. and Bolorunduro, P.I., 2008. Draught animal power utilization in small holder farms—A case study of Ringim Local Government Area of Jigawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 6, 299 – 302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. J., 1999. Capitals and Capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27, 2021–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson, D.F., 1996. Deagrarianization and rural employment in sub-Saharan Africa: a sectoral perspective, World Development. 24, 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorward, A., Anderson, S., Nava, Y., Pattison, J., Rushton, J. and Sánchez V.E., 2006. Guía de indicadores y métodos para la evaluación de la aportación de la crianza de ganado en los modos de vida de los pobres, (Department of Agricultural Sciences, Imperial College London and Livestock Production Programme, Department for International Development, London, U.K).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. 1998. Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 351, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C., 2008. Multivariate data analysis, Fifth Edition, International Edition. (Prentice-Hall International Inc., New Jersey, USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herani, G.M., 2008. Livelihood diversication and opinion polls' analysis. Evidence from Tharpakar-Sindh (Pakistan). MPRA Paper No. 8050, posted 18. Abril 2008/11:17. Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8050/

  • Hussein, K. and Nelson J., 1999. Sustainable Livelihoods and Diversification, IDS working paper No 69, (Institute of Development Studies, Brighton).

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI - Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, 2007. Censo Agrícola, Ganadero y Forestal 2007. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, México. Accessed 28 August 2010. http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/TabuladosBasicos/Default.aspx?c=17177&s=est

  • Kibwage, J.K., Odondo, A. J. and Momanyi, G.M., 2009. Assessment of livelihood assets and strategies among tobacco and no tobacco growing households in south Nyanza region, Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4, 294–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perondi M., A. Schneider S., Bonato A., A., 2008. Diversification for development: Theorical basis for diversification of rural livelihoods. (WHO meeting on economically sustainnable alternatives to tobacco growing, May 2008, Mexico City).

  • Phu, P.X., 2008. Livelihood ways in the residential cluster and dyke programme in Mekong Delta, Vietnam: A case study. Asia-Pasific Journal of Rural Development, 18, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, Joy C., 2010 Animal traction and transport in the 21st century: Getting the priorities right. The Veterinary Journal, 186, 271 – 274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pulido, J.S. and Bocco, G., 2003. The traditional farming system of a Mexican indigenous community: the case of Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro, Michoacan, Mexico. Geoderma, 111, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, T., Berdegué, J. and Escobar, G., 2004. Empleo e ingresos rurales no agrícolas en América Latina: síntesis e implicaciones de políticas. In: Empleo e ingresos no agrícolas en América Latina, Serie Seminario y Conferencias, (División de Desarrollo Productivo y Empresarial, Unidad de Desarrollo Agrícola, Santiago de Chile).

  • Savadogo, K., Reardon, T. and Pietolac, K. 1998, Adoption of improved land use technologies to increase food security in Burkina Faso: Relating animal traction, productivity, and non-farm income. Agricultural Systems, 58, 441–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, P. H. 2000. Rapid appraisal methologies for animal traction. In: Kaumbutho, P. G., Pearson R. A. and Simalenga, T. E. (eds), Empowering farmers with animal traction. Proceedings of the Workshop Network for Eastern and Southern Africa (ATNESA) held 20–24 September 1999. Mpumalanga, South Africa.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express our gratitude to the campesino families of the villages of La Era and Santa CruzSan in Pablo Tlalchichilpa in the municipality of San Felipe del Progreso, State of Mexico, for their participation in the project, their kindness, hospitality and their disposition to share their knowledge and experience. This work was possible thanks to research grant 2465/2007U of Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México for which we are thankful. Our gratitude also to the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT—Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología) for the grant that enabled Leon Velázquez-Beltran to undertake his doctoral studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos M. Arriaga-Jordán.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Velázquez-Beltrán, L.G., Sánchez-Vera, E., Nava-Bernal, E.G. et al. The role of working equines to livelihoods in current day campesino hill-slope communities in central Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 43, 1623–1632 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9881-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9881-6

Keywords

Navigation