Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of supplementation on the feed intake and performance of confined and scavenging crossbred growing chickens in Burkina Faso

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance of crossbred growing chickens (Rhode Island Red × indigenous Burkina Faso hens) from 6 to 17 weeks of age, under five feeding/management regimes: (1) CMx(+), confined and given a mixed feed containing cracked maize and cowpea and a vitamin–mineral premix ad libitum; (2) CS(+), confined and offered ad libitum a choice of cracked maize and cowpea with the premix; (3) ScS(+), scavenging from 09:00 to 16:00 with the diet in treatment (2) available from 16:00 to 09:00; (4) ScS(−), treatment (3) but without the premix; and (5) ScO, scavenging only, with no supplements provided. Daily dry matter (DM) intake was highest for CS(+) (43.5 g), and lowest for CMx(+) (33.6 g) (p < 0.05), with intermediate intakes for ScS(+) and Sc(−) of 36.7 g and 36.2 g, respectively. The ratios of intakes of cowpea to maize were 50:50, 21:79, 27:73 and 22:78 for CMx(+), CS(+), ScS(+) and ScS(−), respectively (p < 0.05). Dietary concentrations of crude protein (CP) were 15.7%, 11.5%, 12.3% and 11.6% of DM for CMx(+), CS(+), ScS(+) and ScS(−), respectively. Average daily gains (ADG) were 8.15 g, 5.24 g, 6.03 g, 5.36 g and 4.45 g for CMx(+), CS(+), ScS(+), ScS(−) and ScO, respectively, and were significantly higher for CMx(+) (p < 0.05). Feed conversion ratio was highest for CS(+) and lowest for CMx(+). ADG of the males (6.44 g) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of the females (5.86 g). Breast and thigh muscle weights were highest for ScS(+) (p < 0.05).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AA:

amino acids

ADG:

average daily gain

ASH:

total ash

CF:

crude fibre

CP:

crude protein

DM:

dry matter

EE:

ether extract

FCR:

feed conversion ratio

FCS:

feed costs/kg weight gain

LSM:

least-squares mean

ME:

metabolizable energy

NFE:

nitrogen-free extract

OM:

organic matter

TME:

true metabolizable energy

SFR:

scavenging feed resources

USD:

US dollar

References

  • AOAC, 1985. Official Methods of Analysis, (AOAC International, Washington, DC), 957

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabezas, M.T., Garcia, J., Murillo, B., Elias, L. and Bressani, R.,1982. Nutritive value of raw and processed cowpea. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion, 32, 543–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castellini, C., Mugnai, C. and Dal Bosco, A., 2002. Effect of organic production systems on broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Science, 60, 219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, N. and Ogle, B., 2002. Effect of scavenging on diet selection and performance of Rhode Island Red and Fayoumi breeds of chickens offered a choice of energy and protein feeds. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 34, 417–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dessie, T., 1996. Studies on village poultry production systems in the central highlands of Ethiopia, (MSc thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden)

  • EJA, 1998. Burkina Faso Atlas. Les Editions Jeune Afrique, 3rd French edn, (EJA, Paris), 43–47

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 1980. Soil and plant testing analysis. Soil Bulletin, (FAO, Geneva)

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 1996. Production Yearbook, (FAO, Rome)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueye, E.F., 1998. Village egg and fowl meat production. World's Poultry Science Journal, 54, 73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), 1986. Nutrition of laying hens.In: J. Wiseman (ed.), Feeding of Non-Ruminant Livestock, (Butterworths, Nottingham), 78–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambot, C. 2002. Industrial potential of cowpea. Agriculture Raw Materials, (Nestle Research Center, Abidjan), 367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L.P., Ann, E.H. and Larry, G.B.,1980. Tannin content of cowpea, chickpea, pigeon pea, and mung pean. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 28, 459–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minh, D.V. and Ogle, B., 2005. Effect of scaveging and supplementation of lysine and methionine on the feed intake, performance and carcass quality of improved Dual-Purpose growing chickens. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 37, 573–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minh, D.V., Lindberg, J.E. and Ogle, B., 2006. Effect of season and location on the crop contents of local and improved scavenging hens in northern Vietnam. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 38, 121–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minitab, 2000. Minitab Reference Manual 2000, Release 13.31 for Windows 2000, (Minitab Inc., State College, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Olver, M.D. and Malan, D., 2000. The effect of choice-feeding from 7 weeks of age on the production characteristics of laying hens. South African Journal of Animal Science, 30, 110–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, C.V., 2002. Performance of crossbred chickens (Cobb# 500 parents × Local) in a controlled environment when substituting parts of maize meal and soya bean meal with sunflower seed cake. Production of semi-scavenging chickens in Zimbabwe, (PhD thesis, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen)

  • Pousga, S., Boly, H. and Ogle, B., 2005a. Choice-feeding of poultry: a review. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 17 (4) http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/4/pous17045.htm

  • Pousga, S., Boly, H., Lindberg, J.E. and Ogle, B., 2005b. Scavenging chickens in Burkina Faso: effect of season, location and breed on feed and nutrient intake. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 37, 623–634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pusztai, A., Grant, G., Brown, D.J., Stewart, J.C. and Bardocz, 1992. Nutritional evaluation of the trypsin (EC 3. 4. 21. 4) inhibitor from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.). British Journal of Nutrition, 68, 783–791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, P.B., Picard, M., Nir, I., Dunnington, E.A., Willemsen, M.H.A. and Williams, P.E.V., 1997. Response of meat type chickens to choice-feeding of diets differing in protein and energy from hatch to market. Poultry Science, 76, 1183–1192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tegene, N., 1992. Dietary status of smallholder local chickens in Leku, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Science, 15, 58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest, P., Robertson, J. and Lewis, B., 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutal detergent fibre and nonstarch polysaccarides in relation to animal nutrition. Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wattanachant, S., Benjakul, S. and Ledward, D.A., 2004. Composition, color and texture of Thai indigenous and broiler chicken muscles. Poultry Sciences, 83, 123–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Ogle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pousga, S., Boly, H., Lindberg, J.E. et al. Effect of supplementation on the feed intake and performance of confined and scavenging crossbred growing chickens in Burkina Faso. Trop Anim Health Prod 38, 323–331 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4395-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4395-3

Keywords

Navigation