Advertisement

Tribology Letters

, 67:116 | Cite as

Lubrication Mechanisms Between Parallel Rough Surfaces

  • Noël BrunetièreEmail author
  • Arthur Francisco
Original Paper
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a numerical analysis of the hydrodynamic pressure build-up between parallel surfaces. According to the Reynolds theory, it is not possible to generate a pressure between flat parallel sliding surfaces. However, experimental results demonstrate that mechanical seal surfaces can be separated by a full fluid film if the sliding speed is high enough. Several theories, including the roughness effect, have been proposed to explain this unexpected lift-off. A real demonstration of the roughness induced pressure generation has only recently been made possible with the development of deterministic mixed lubrication models. It is demonstrated that a transverse pumping mechanism that varies from place to place with the surface topography can explain the pressure build-up. A simplified model is proposed to include the transverse pumping and to simulate the roughness induced pressure generation.

Keywords

Mixed lubrication Hydrodynamic lubrication Roughness 

References

  1. 1.
    Adjemout, M., Brunetiere, N., Bouyer, J.: Numerical analysis of the texture effect on the hydrodynamic performance of a mechanical seal. Surf. Topogr.: Metrol. Prop. 4(1), 014002 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672X/4/1/014002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayadi, K., Brunetière, N., Tournerie, B., Maoui, A.: Experimental and numerical study of the lubrication regimes of a liquid mechanical seal. Tribol. Int. 92, 96–108 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.05.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bayada, G., Faure, J.: A double scale analysis approach of the reynolds roughness—comments and application to the journal bearing. J. Tribol. 111(2), 323–330 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bayada, G., Martin, S., Vasquez, C.: An average flow model of the reynolds roughness including a mass-flow preserving cavitation model. J. Tribol. 127(4), 797–802 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brunetière, N., Tournerie, B., Minet, C.: On the roughness induced hydrodynamic pressure in mechanical face seals. In: 21st International Conference on Fluid Sealing, pp. 103–113. BHRGroup, Milton Keynes (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denny, D.: Some measurements of fluid pressures between plane parallel thrust surfaces with special reference to radial-face seals. Wear 4, 64–83 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flitney, R., Nau, B.: Performance testing of mechanical seals. In: Nau, B. (ed.) 13th International Conference on Fluid Sealing, pp. 441–466. BHR Group, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Brugge (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Francisco, A., Brunetière, N.: A hybrid method for fast and efficient rough surface generation. J. Eng. Tribol. J 230(7), 747–768 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650115612116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenwood, J.A., Williamson, J.B.P.: Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. (Lond.) A295, 300–319 (1966)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gropper, D., Wang, L., Harvey, T.J.: Hydrodynamic lubrication of textured surfaces: a review of modeling techniques and key findings. Tribol. Int. 94, 509–529 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamilton, D., Walowit, J., Allen, C.: A theory of lubrication by micro-irregularities. J. Basic Eng. 88, 177–185 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamrock, B., Dowson, D.: Ball Bearing Lubrication—The Elastohydrodynamics of Elliptical Contacts, p. 047103553X. Wiley, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harp, S., Salant, R.: An average flow model of rough surface lubrication with inter-asperity cavitation. J. Tribol. 123(1), 134–143 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hill, I., Hill, R., Holder, R.: Fitting johnson curves by moments. Appl. Stat. 25, 180–189 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu, Y., Tonder, K.: Simulation of 3-d random rough surface by 2-d digital filter and fourier analysis. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 32(1/2), 83–90 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kane, M., Bou-Saïd, B.: Comparison of homogenization and direct techniques for the treatment of roughness in incompressible lubrication. J. Tribol. 126(4), 733–737 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lebeck, A.: Parallel sliding load support in the mixed friction regime. Part 1—the experimental data. J. Tribol. 109(1), 189–195 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lebeck, A.: Parallel sliding load support in the mixed friction regime. Part 2—evaluations of the mechanisms. J. Tribol. 109(1), 196–205 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lebeck, A.: Principle and Design of Mechanical Face Seals. Wiley, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lebeck, A.: Mixed lubrication in mechanical face seals with plain faces. J. Eng. Tribol. J 213(J3), 163–175 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lubbinge, H.: On the lubrication of mechanical face seals. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minet, C., Brunetière, N., Tournerie, B.: A deterministic mixed lubrication model for mechanical seals. J. Tribol. 133(4), 042203 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005068
  23. 23.
    Minet, C., Brunetière, N., Tournerie, B.: On the lubrication of mechanical seals with rough surfaces: a parametric study. J. Eng. Tribol. J 226(12), 1109–1126 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nau, B.: Hydrodynamic lubrication in face seals. In: BHRA, (ed.) 3rd International Conference on Fluid Sealing, Paper E5, pp. 73–120. BHRA, Cambridge (1967)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nau, B.S.: Hydrodynamics in face seal films. In: 2nd International Conference on Fluid Sealing, paper F5, pp. 61–80. BHRA, Cranfield, England (1964)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nyemeck, A., Brunetière, N., Tournerie, B.: A multiscale approach to the mixed lubrication regime: application to mechanical seals. Tribol. Lett. 47(3), 417–429 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pape, J.: Fundamental research on a radial face seal. ASLE Trans. 11(4), 302–309 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patir, N., Cheng, H.: An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication. J. Lubr. Technol. 100(1), 12–17 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Patir, N., Cheng, H.: Application of average flow model to lubrication between rough sliding surfaces. J. Lubr. Technol. 101(2), 220–230 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reynolds, O.: On the theory of lubrication and its application to mr. beauchamp tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 177, 157–234 (1886)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    So, H., Chen, C.: Effects of micro-wedges formed between parallel surfaces on mixed lubrication—part i: experimental evidence. Tribol. Lett. 17(3), 513–520 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRIL.0000044499.67099.74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    So, H., Chen, C.: Effects of micro-wedges formed between parallel surfaces on mixed lubrication—part ii: modeling. Tribol. Lett. 19(2), 83–91 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-005-5083-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Summers-Smith, D.: Laboratory investigation of the performance of a radial face seal. In: BHRA, (ed.) 1st International Conference on Fluid Sealing, Paper D1. BHRA, Ashford, UK (1961)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tripp, J.: Surface roughness effects in hydrodynamic lubrication: the flow factor method. J. Lubr. Technol. 105(3), 458–465 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vezjak, A., Vizintin, J.: Experimental study on the relationship between lubrication regime and the performance of mechanical seals. Lubr. Eng. 57(1), 17–22 (2001)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Watson, W., Spedding, T.: The time series modelling of non-gaussian engineering processes. Wear 83, 215–231 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Pprime, CNRS, Université de Poitiers, EnsmaFuturoscopeFrance

Personalised recommendations