Advertisement

Tribology Letters

, 67:81 | Cite as

Model Friction Studies of Chemical Mechanical Planarization Using a Pin-on-Disk Tribometer

  • Catheryn L. JacksonEmail author
  • David W. MosleyEmail author
Original Paper
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

A pin-on-disk attachment for a commercial rheometer was used as a model system for chemical–mechanical planarization. The system enables real-time measurements of friction and the pin height changes as a function of velocity and load. We found the pin-on-disk tribology geometry was able to achieve a range of down pressures relevant to CMP processes (24.5 kPa at Fn = 1.5 N). It was possible to measure changes in the pin height, or gap, on the order of 1 µm during the test, which was useful to determine the amount of wear on the polishing pad and whether the system moves into hydrodynamic lubrication. The pad conditioning, or break-in process with water using a stainless steel disk with embedded diamond teeth, was conducted right before the tribology test, as in CMP processes, to give a consistent texture and remove surface impurities. Control studies of pure water at various pH’s showed the friction coefficient data and gap changes between the pad and the silicon wafer vary with the pH and ionic strength of the solution. CMP polishing was also studied with commercial slurries, pads and silicon wafers, showing that COF and pad wear can be measured reliably in the tribometer and compares well to measurements made on a 200 mm CMP commercial polisher for both water and the slurry. Overall, the pin-on-disk attachment was found to provide good insights of the tribology of a full CMP system.

Keywords

CMP Tribology Water CMP pad CMP slurry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to John McCormick, Doran Bennett, Michael Mills, and Naresh Penta for numerous discussions about CMP process friction, and providing historical CMP polishing data. We thank Tim Mace and Jianxin Ma for confocal microscopy of samples. We thank Marty DeGroot, Jim Alexander, and Bob Auger for research support, as well as The Dow Chemical Company and the DuPont Electronics and Imaging business.

References

  1. 1.
    Li, Y. (ed.): Microelectronic Applications of Chemical Mechanical Planarization. Wiley Interscience, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gitis, N., Mudhivarthi, R.: Tribometrology of CMP process. In: Li, Y. (ed.) Microelectronic Applications of Chemical Mechanical Planarization, pp. 81–122. Wiley Interscience, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liang, H.: Tribology in Chemical-Mechanical Planarization. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tamai, K., Morinaga, H., Doi, T.K., Kurokawa, S., Ohnishi, O.: Analysis of chemical and mechanical factors in CMP processes for improving material removal rate. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158(3), H333 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, H., Yang, J.C., Lee, J., Park, S.H., Won, J., Kim, M., Kim, T.: Frictional characteristic of polymeric additive for the slurry of chemical mechanical planarization process. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 1(3), P101–P106 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo, Y., Lee, H., Lee, Y., Jeong, H.: Effect of pad groove geometry on material removal characteristics in chemical mechanical polishing. Int. J. Precision Eng. Man. 13(2), 303–306 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choi, W., Abiade, J., Lee, S.-M., Singh, R.K.: Effects of slurry particles on silicon dioxide CMP. J. Electrochem. Soc. 151(8), G512–G522 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ishikawa, A., Matsuo, H., Kikkawa, T.: Influence of slurry chemistry on frictional force in copper chemical mechanical polishing. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152(9), G695–G697 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abiade, J.T., Yeruva, S., Choi, W., Moudgil, B.M., Kumar, D., Singh, R.K.: A tribochemical study of ceria-silica interactions for CMP. J. Electrochem. Soc. 153(11), G1001–G1004 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heinrich, G., Kluppel, M.: Rubber friction, tread deformation and tire traction. Wear 265, 1052–1060 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ruths, M., Israelachvili, J.N.: Surface forces and nanorheology of molecularly thin films. In: Bhusan, B. (ed.) Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology, 3rd edn, pp. 857–922. Springer, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gray, C., Apon, D., Rogers, C., Manno, V.P., Barns, C., Moinpour, M., Anjur, S., Philipossian, A.: Viewing asperity behavior under the wafer during CMP. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 8(5), G109–G111 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klein, J.: Hydration lubrication. Friction 1(1), 1–23 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klein, J.: Shear, friction, and lubrication forces between polymer-bearing surfaces. Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 26, 581–612 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ratoi, M., Spikes, H.A.: Lubricating properties of aqueous surfactant solutions. Tribol. Trans. 42(3), 479–486 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dowson, D.: Elastohydrodynamic and micro-elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Wear 190, 125–138 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bocquet, L., Charlaix, E.: Nanofluidics, from bulk to interfaces. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1073–1095 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee, C., Park, J., Kinoshita, M., Jeong, H.: Analysis of pressure distribution and verification of pressure signal by changes load and velocity in chemical mechanical polishing. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 16(6), 1061–1066 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shan, L., Levert, J., Meade, L., Tichy, J., Danyluk, S.: Interfacial fluid mechanics and pressure prediction in chemical mechanical polishing. J. Tribol. 122, 539–543 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Terrell, E.J., Higgs, C.F.: Hydrodynamics of slurry flow in chemical mechanical polishing—a review. J. Electrochem. Soc. 153(6), K15–K22 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suzuki, N., Hashimoto, Y., Yasuda, H., Yamaki, S., Mochizuki, Y.: Prediction of polishing pressure distribution in CMP process with airbag type wafer carrier. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 66, 329–332 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao, D., He, Y., Wang, T., Lu, X., Luo, J.: Wafer bending/orientation characterization and their effects on fluid lubrication during chemical mechanical polishing. Tribol. Int. 66, 330–336 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holmberg, K., Ronkainen, H., Laukkanen, A., Wallin, K.: Friction and wear of coated surfaces—scales, modeling and simulation of tribomechanisms. Surf. Coat. Technol. 202, 1034–1049 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nosonovsky, M., Bhushan, B.: Multiscale friction mechanism and hierarchical surfaces in nano- and bio-tribology. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 58, 162–193 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Blau, P.J.: The significance and use of the friction coefficient. Tribol. Int. 34, 585–591 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Esayanur, M.S., Yeruva, S.B., Rabinovich, Y.I., Moudgil, B.M.: Interaction force measurements using atomic force microscopy for characterization and control of adhesion, dispersion and lubrication in particulate systems. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 19(8), 611–626 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ilie, F., Tita, C.: Selective layer chemical mechanical planarization process mimicked with atomic force microscope. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 225(J5), 289–297 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McNamee, C.E., Higashitani, K.: Effect of the charge and roughness of surfaces on normal and friction forces measured in aqueous solutions. Langmuir 29(16), 5013–5022 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shahriver, K., Ortiz, A.L., de Vicente, J.: A comparative study of the tribological performance of ferrofluids and magnetorheological fluids within steel-steel point contacts. Tribol. Int. 78, 125–133 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heyer, P., Lauger, J.: Correlation between friction and flow of lubricating greases in a new tribometer device. Lubr. Sci. 21, 253–268 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gallego, R., Cidade, T., Sanchez, R., Valencia, C., Franco, J.M.: Tribological behavior of novel chemically modified biopolymer-thickened lubricating greases investigated in a steel-steel rotating ball-on-three plates tribology cell. Tribol. Int. 94, 652–660 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Prakash, S., Tan, D.D.Y., Chen, J.: Applications of tribology in studying food oral processing and texture perception. Food Res. Int. 54, 1627–1635 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim, J.M., Wolf, F., Baier, S.K.: Effect of varying mixing ratio of PDMS on the consistency of the soft-contact Stribeck curve for glycerol solutions. Tribol. Int. 89, 46–53 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liang, H., Xu, G.H.: Lubricating behavior in chemical–mechanical polishing of copper. Scr. Mater. 46, 343–347 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nguyen, P.T.M., Bhandari, B., Prakash, S.: Tribological method to measure lubricating properties of dairy products. J. Food Eng. 168, 27–34 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reddy, K.-A., Lawing, A.S., Koons, G.S., Guo, Y., Zhendong, L.: CMP pad asperity wear dependence on the morphology and concentration of the abrasive particles in the polishing slurries. Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Planarization/CMP Technology, Phoenix, AZ, p. 168. American Vacuum Society, Phoenix, AZ (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pipe, C.J., Majmudar, T.S., McKinley, G.H.: High shear rate viscometry. Rheol Acta 47, 621–642 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Burris, D.L., Sawyer, W.G.: Addressing practical challenges of low friction coefficient measurements. Tribol. Lett. 35, 17–23 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rajesh, J.J., Bijwe, J., Tewari, U.S.: Abrasive wear performance of various polyamides. Wear 252, 769–776 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Han, R., Sampurno, Y., Theng, S., Sudargho, F., Zhuang, Y., Philipossian, A.: Method for ultra rapid determination of the lubrication mechanism in chemical mechanical planarization. ECS J. Solid Sate Sci. Technol. 6(1), P32–P37 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Liang, H.: Chemical boundary lubrication in chemical-mechanical planarization. Tribol. Int. 38, 235–242 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Borucki, L.J., Sun, T., Zhuang, Y., Slutz, D., Philipossian, A.: Pad topography, contact area, and hydrodynamic lubrication in chemical-mechanical polishing. Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 1157, E01 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Spikes, H.A.: Film-forming additives—direct and indirect ways to reduce friction. Lubr. Sci. 14(2), 147–167 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kalin, M., Novak, S., Vizintin, J.: Surface charge as a new concept for boundary lubrication of ceramics with water. J. Phys. D 39, 3138–3149 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Scaraggi, M., Persson, B.N.J.: Theory of viscoelastic lubrication. Tribol. Int. 72, 118–130 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Scaraggi, M., Carbone, G., Dini, D.: Experimental evidence of micro-EHL lubrication in rough soft contacts. Tribol. Lett. 43, 169–174 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Philipossian, A., Olsen, S.: Fundamental tribological and removal rate studies of inter-layer dielectric chemical mechanical planarization. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 42, 6371–6379 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Dow Chemical Company, Core R &DCollegevilleUSA
  2. 2.DuPont Electronics and ImagingWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations