Advertisement

Tribology Letters

, 66:58 | Cite as

Review of Viscosity Modifier Lubricant Additives

  • Ashlie Martini
  • Uma Shantini Ramasamy
  • Michelle Len
Review

Abstract

This article reviews viscosity modifiers, additives that increase the viscosity of lubricating oils. Viscosity modifiers are high molecular weight polymers whose functionality is derived from their thickening efficiency, viscosity–temperature relationship, and shear stability. There are now many different additive chemistries and architectures available, all of which have advantages and disadvantages, and affect solution viscosity through different mechanisms. Understanding these mechanisms and how they impart additive function is critical to the development of new viscosity modifiers that enable lubricants to function more efficiently over a wide range of temperatures.

Keywords

Viscosity modifiers Viscosity index improvers Lubricant additives 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Michael Covitch and Joan Souchik for invaluable feedback on the manuscript, as well as David Gray, Hugh Spikes and Paul Michael for helpful input. We also acknowledge the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (Grant #55026-ND6), National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Compact and Efficient Fluid Power EEC 05440834, and the National Fluid Power Association Education and Technology Foundations Pascal Society for support of this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Ver Strate, G., Struglinski, M.J.: Polymers as lubricating-oil viscosity modifiers. In: Schulz, D.N., Glass, J.E. (eds.) Polymers as Rheology Modifiers. American Chemical Society, Washington (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM D2270-10: Standard practice for calculating viscosity index from kinematic viscosity at 40 and 100C. Technical report, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stöhr, T., Eisenberg, B., Müller, M.: A new generation of high performance viscosity modifiers based on comb polymers. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 1(2008–01–2462), 1511–1516 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zakarian, J.: The limitations of the viscosity index and proposals for other methods to rate viscosity–temperature behavior of lubricating oils. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5, 1123–1131 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Covitch, M.J.: An improved method for calculating viscosity index (VI) of low viscosity base oils. J. Test. Eval. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20150242 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cusseau, P., Bouscharain, N., Martinie, L., Philippon, D., Vergne, P., Briand, F.: Rheological considerations on polymer-based engine lubricants: viscosity index improvers versus thickeners—generalized Newtonian models. Tribol. Trans. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2017.1346154 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh, H., Gulati, I.B.: Influence of base oil refining on the performance of viscosity index improvers. Wear 118(1), 33–56 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Müller, H.G.: Mechanism of action of viscosity index improvers. Tribol. Int. 11(3), 189–192 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kwaambwa, H.M., Goodwin, J.W., Hughes, R.W., Reynolds, P.A.: Viscosity, molecular weight and concentration relationships at 298k of low molecular weight cis-polyisoprene in a good solvent. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 294, 14–19 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rubin, I.D., Sen, A.: Solution viscosities of ethylene–propylene copolymers in oils. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 40(3–4), 523–530 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Horne, W.L.: Polymethacrylates as viscosity index improvers and pour point depressants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41(5), 952–959 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rudnick, L.R., Shubkin, R.L.: Synthetic Lubricants and High Performance Functional Fluids, Revised and Expanded. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brandrup, J., Immergut, E.H., Grulke, E.A.: Polymer Handbook, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Covitch, M.J.: How polymer architecture affects permanent viscosity loss of multigrade lubricants. SAE Technical Paper Series, 982638, 1–14 (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stambaugh, R.L., Kinker, B.G.: Viscosity index improvers and thickeners. In: Mortier, R.M., Fox, M.F., Orszulik, S.T. (eds.) Chemistry and Technology of Lubricants. Springer, Dordrecht (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holtzinger, J., Green, J., Lamb, G., Atkinson, D., Spikes, H.: New method of measuring permanent viscosity loss of polymer-containing lubricants. Tribol. Trans. 5, 631–639 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu, J.F.S., Zakin, J.L., Patterson, G.K.: Mechanical degradation of high molecular weight polymers in dilute solution. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 23, 2493–2512 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marx, N., Ponjavic, A., Taylor, R.I., Spikes, H.A.: Study of permanent shear thinning of VM polymer solutions. Tribol. Lett. 65, 106 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ASTM D7109-12: Standard test method for shear stability of polymer containing fluids using a European diesel injector apparatus at 30 and 90 cycles. Technical report, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    ASTM D2603-01: Standard test method for sonic shear stability of polymer-containing oils. Technical report, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    CEC L-45-99: Viscosity shear stability of transmission lubricants (taper roller bearing rig). Technical report, Coordinating European Council, Brussels, Belgium (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Michael, P., Cheekolu, M., Panwar, P., Devlin, M., Davidson, R., Johnson, D., Martini, A.: Temporary and permanent viscosity loss correlated to hydraulic system performance. Tribol. Trans. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2018.1439210 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mortier, M.: Laboratory shearing tests for viscosity index improvers. Tribotest 2, 239–349 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bair, S.: High Pressure Rheology for Quantitative Elastohydrodynamics. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bair, S., Qureshi, F.: Accurate measurements of pressure-viscosity behavior in lubricants. Tribol. Trans. 45, 390–396 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bair, S., Mary, C., Bouscharain, N., Vergne, P.: An improved Yasutomi correlation for viscosity at high pressure. Proc. IMechE Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 227, 1056–1060 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mary, C., Phillipon, D., Lafarge, L., Laurent, D., Rondelez, F., Bair, S., Vergne, P.: New insight into the relationship between molecular effects and the rheological behavior of polymer-thickened lubricants under high pressure. Tribol. Lett. 52, 357–369 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morgan, S., Ye, Z., Subramanian, R., Zhu, S.: Higher-molecular-weight hyperbranched polyethylenes containing crosslinking structures as lubricant viscosity-index improvers. Polym. Eng. Sci. 50(5), 911–918 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosenberg, R.C.: The influence of polymer additives on journal bearing performance. SAE Trans. 84, 750692 (1975)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lane, G., Roberts, D.C., Tims, J.M.: Measurement of the viscosity of multigrade oils in a running engine. SAE Trans. 86, 770379 (1977)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boor Jr., J.: Ziegler-Natta Catalysts Polymerizations. Academic Press, Cambridge (1979)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Soares, J.B.P., Hamielec, A.E.: Metallocene/aluminoxane catalysts for olefin polymerization. A review. Polym. React. Eng. 3(2), 131–200 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chien, J.C.W., He, D.: Olefin copolymerization with metallocene catalysts. I. Comparison of catalysts. J. Polym. Sci. A 29(11), 1585–1593 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marsden, K.: Literature review of OCP viscosity modifiers. Lubr. Sci. 1(3), 265–280 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rudnick, L.R.: Lubricant Additives: Chemistry and Applications. Chemical Industries. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cozewith, C., Ju, S., VerStrate, G.W.: Narrow MWD alpha-olefin copolymers, September 25 1990. US Patent 4,959,436Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ver Strate, G., Cozewith, C., Ju., S.: Near monodisperse ethylene-propylene copolymers by direct Ziegler-Natta polymerization. Preparation, characterization, properties. Macromolecules 21(12), 3360–3371 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rizvi, S.Q.A.: A Comprehensive Review of Lubricant Chemistry, Technology, Selection, and Design. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johnson, J.R., Schober, B.J.: Loose core star polymers and lubricating composition thereof (March 5 2013). US Patent 20150183915A1Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baum, M., Schober, B.J., Davies, M.C., Viger, D.C., Johnson, J.R.: Process for preparing polymers and compositions thereof (November 21 2013). US Patent App. 13/936,445Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Selby, T.W.: The non-newtonian characteristics of lubricating oils. ASLE Trans. 1(1), 68–81 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Covitch, M.J., Trickett, K.J.: How polymers behave as viscosity index improvers in lubricating oils. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 5(2), 134–151 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Goldmints, I., Oberoi, S.: Hydrogenated styrene-diene copolymer viscosity modifiers. In: Rudnick, L.R. (ed.) Lubricant Additives: Chemistry and Applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jukić, A., Rogošić, M., Franjić, I., Šoljić, I.: Molecular interaction in some polymeric additive solutions containing styrene-hydrogenated butadiene copolymer. Eur. Polym. J. 45(9), 2594–2599 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wilson, B.: Polybutenes-the multipurpose base oil and additive. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 46(6), 3–6 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pennewiss, H., Benda, R., Jost, H., Knoell, H.: Lubricating oil additives (September 22 1981). US Patent 4,290,925Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Takigawa, S., Teranishi, K., Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Sakai, K.: Polymer composition useful as viscosity index improver (June 25 1991). US Patent 5,026,496Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pennewiss, H., Beyer, C., Jelitte, R., Will, B., Auschra, C., Omeis, J.: Polymer emulsions with bimodal molecular-weight distribution (June 30 1998). US Patent 5,773,505Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jukić, A., Tomašek, L.J., Janović, Z.: Polyolefin and poly(alkyl methacrylate) mixed additives as mineral lubricating oil rheology modifiers. Lubr. Sci. 17(4), 431–449 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jukić, A., Vidović, E., Janović, Z.: Alkyl methacrylate and styrene terpolymers as lubricating oil viscosity index improvers. Chem. Technol. Fuels Oils 43(5), 386–394 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jarrin, J., Robine, M., Parc, G., Dawans, F.: Copolymer compositions usable as additives for lubricating oils (July 12 1988). US Patent 4,756,843Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jukić, A., Rogošić, M., Vidović, E.: Thermal stability of lubricating oil additives based on styrene and n-alkyl methacrylate terpolymers. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 49(1), 74–77 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang, J., Ye, Z., Zhu, S.: Topology-engineered hyperbranched high-molecular-weight polyethylenes as lubricant viscosity-index improvers of high shear stability. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46(4), 1174–1178 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Robinson, J.W., Zhou, Y., Bhattacharya, P., Erck, R., Qu, J., Bays, J.T., Cosimbescu, L.: Probing the molecular design of hyper-branched aryl polyesters towards lubricant applications. Sci. Rep. 6, 18624 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Robinson, J.W., Zhou, Y., Qu, J., Erck, R., Cosimbescu, L.: Effects of star-shaped poly(alkyl methacrylate) arm uniformity on lubricant properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 133(26), 43611 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schober, B.J., Vickerman, R.J., Leeb, O., Dimitrakisa, W.J., Gajanayakec, A.: Controlled architecture viscosity modifiers for driveline fluids: enhanced fuel efficiency and wear protection. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Fuels & Lubes Asia Conference, Seoul, Korea (2008)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Eckert, R.J.A., Covey, D.F.: Developments in the field of hydrogenated diene copolymers as viscosity index improvers. Lubr. Sci. 1(1), 65–80 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tsunashima, Y., Hirata, M., Kawamata, Y.: Diffusion motions and microphase separation of styrene-butadiene diblock copolymer in solution. 1. Extremely dilute solution region. Macromolecules 23, 1089–1096 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Berne, B.J., Pecora, R.: Dynamic Light Scattering: With Applications to Chemistry, Biology, and Physics. Dover Publications, Mineola (2000)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Meurant, G.: Introduction to Dynamic Light Scattering by Macromolecules. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mazur, J., McIntyre, D.: The determination of chain statistical parameters by light scattering measurements. Macromolecules 8(4), 464–476 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Novotny, V.J.: Temperature dependence of hydrodynamic dimensions of polystyrenes in cyclohexane by quasielastic light scattering. J. Chem. Phys. 78(1), 183–189 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bhattacharya, P., Ramasamy, U.S., Krueger, S., Robinson, J.W., Tarasevich, B.J., Martini, A., Cosimbescu, L.: Trends in thermoresponsive behavior of lipophilic polymers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(51), 12983–12990 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Feigin, L.A., Svergun, D.I.: Structure Analysis by Small-Angle X-ray and Neutron Scattering. Springer, Berlin (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Melnichenko, Y.B., Wignall, G.D., Van Hook, W.A., Szydlowski, J., Wilczura, H., Rebelo, L.P.: Comparison of inter- and intramolecular correlations of polystyrene in poor and solvents via small-angle neutron scattering. Macromolecules 31(23), 8436–8438 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Melnichenko, Y.B., Kiran, E., Heath, K., Salaniwal, S., Cochran, H.D., Stamm, M., Van Hook, W.A., Wignall, G.D.: SANS studies of polymers in organic solvents and supercritical fluids in the poor, theta, and good solvent domains. In: Cebe, P., Hsiao, B.S., Lohse, D.J. (eds.) Scattering from Polymers. American Chemical Society, Washington (1999)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    LaRiviere, D., Asfour, A.A., Hage, A., Gao, J.Z.: Viscometric properties of viscosity index improvers in lubricant base oil over a wide temperature range. Part I: Group II base oil. Lubr. Sci. 12(02), 133–143 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ramasamy, U.S., Lichter, S., Martini, A.: Effect of molecular-scale features on the polymer coil size of model viscosity index improvers. Tribol. Lett. 62(23), 1–7 (2016)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ramasamy, U.S., Len, M., Martini, A.: Correlating molecular structure to the behavior of linear styrene–butadiene viscosity modifiers. Tribol. Lett. 65(4), 147 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Len, M., Ramasamy, U.S., Lichter, S., Martini, A.: Thickening mechanisms of polyisobutylene in polyalphaolefin. Tribol. Lett. 66(1), 5 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wool, R.P.: Polymer entanglements. Macromolecules 26, 1564–1569 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Shivokhin, M.E., Narita, T., Talini, L., Habicht, A., Seiffert, S., Indei, T., Schieber, J.D.: Interplay of entanglement and association effects on the dynamics of semidilute solutions of multisticker polymer chains. J. Rheol. 61, 1231 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    George, H.F., Hendrick, D.P.: Comparative rheology of commercial viscosity modifier concentrates. SAE Technical Paper, 932834 (1993)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bezot, P., Hesse-Bezot, C., Elmakoudi, B., Constants, B., Faure, D., Hoornaert, P.: Comparison of hydrodynamic and rheological properties of dilute solutions of a styrene-hydrogenated butadiene copolymer in aliphatic solvents by light scattering and viscometric techniques. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 51(10), 1715–1725 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    de Gennes, P.G.: Reptation of a polymer chain in the presence of fixed obstacles. J. Chem. Phys. 55(2), 572–579 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Bezot, P., Hesse-Bezot, C., Constans, B., Faure, D., Hoornaert, P.: A microscopic study by dynamic light scattering of four viscosity index improvers in two model solvents and a mineral base oil. SAE Technical Paper, 982835 (1993)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ferry, J.D.: Viscoelastic properties of polymer solutions. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 41(1), 53–61 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Longworth, R., Morawetz, H.: Polymer association. IV. Hydrogen bonding and melt viscosities in copolymers of styrene with methacrylic acid. J. Polym. Sci. A 29(119), 307–319 (1958)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Yekta, A., Xu, B., Duhamel, J., Adiwidjaja, H., Winnik, M.A.: Fluorescence studies of associating polymers in water: determination of the chain end aggregation number and a model for the association process. Macromolecules 28(4), 956–966 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Rubinstein, M., Dobrynin, A.V.: Solutions of associative polymers. Trends Polym. Sci. 5(6), 181–186 (1997)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Likhtman, A.E., Ponmurugan, M.: Microscopic definition of polymer entanglements. Macromolecules 47(4), 1470–1481 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Noble, B.A., Mate, C.M., Raeymaekers, B.: Spreading kinetics of ultrathin liquid films using molecular dynamics. Langmuir 33, 3476–3483 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Verdier, P.H., Stockmayer, W.H.: Monte Carlo calculations on the dynamics of polymers in dilute solution. J. Chem. Phys. 36(1), 227–235 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Dünweg, B., Kremer, K.: Microscopic verification of dynamic scaling in dilute polymer solutions: a molecular-dynamics simulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66(23), 2996 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Dünweg, B., Kremer, K.: Molecular dynamics simulation of a polymer chain in solution. J. Chem. Phys. 99(9), 6983–6997 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Edwards, S.F.: The theory of polymer solutions at intermediate concentration. Proc. Phys. Soc. 88(2), 265 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bixon, M.: Polymer dynamics in solution. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 27(1), 65–84 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Fixman, M., Stockmayer, W.H.: Polymer conformation and dynamics in solution. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 21(1), 407–428 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Larson, R.G.: The rheology of dilute solutions of flexible polymers: progress and problems. J. Rheol. 49, 1 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Rouse Jr., P.E.: A theory of the linear viscoelastic properties of dilute solutions of coiling polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 21(7), 1272–1280 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Glass, J.E., Schulz, D.N., Zukoski, C.F.: Polymers as rheology modifiers. In: Schulz, D.N., Glass, J.E. (eds.), Polymers as Rheology Modifiers. Washington, DC (1991)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Spikes, H.A.: Friction modifier additives. Tribol. Lett. 60, 5 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Okrent, E.H.: The effect of lubricant viscosity and composition on engine friction and bearing wear. ASLE Trans. 4, 97–108 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Okrent, E.H.: The effect of lubricant viscosity and composition on engine friction and bearing wear II. ASLE Trans. 4, 257–262 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Müller, M., Topolovec-Miklozic, K., Dardin, A., Spikes, H.A.: The design of boundary film-forming PMA viscosity modifiers. Tribol. Trans. 49, 225–232 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Cann, P.M., Spikes, H.A.: The behavior of polymer solutions in concentrated contacts: immobile surface layer formation. Tribol. Trans. 37, 580–586 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Smeeth, M., Spikes, H.A., Gunsel, S.: Boundary film formation by viscosity index improvers. Tribol. Trans. 39, 726-724 (1996)Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Fan, J., Müller, M., Stöhr, T., Spikes, H.A.: Reduction of friction by functionalised viscosity index improvers. Tribol. Lett. 28, 287–298 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Cosimbescu, L., Vellore, A., Ramasamy, U.S., Burgess, S.A., Martini, A.: Low molecular weight polymethacrylates as multi-functional lubricant additives. Eur. Polym. J. Under Review (2018)Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Robinson, J.W., Zhou, Y., Qu, J., Bays, J.T., Cosimbescu, L.: Highly branched polyethylenes as lubricant viscosity and friction modifiers. React. Funct. Polym. 109, 52–55 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Matsui, Y., Aoki, S., Masuko, M.: Influence of coexisting functionalized polyalkylmethacrylates on the formation of ZnDTP-derived tribofilm. Tribol. Int. 100, 152–161 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Müller, M., Fan, J., Spikes, H.A.: Influence of polymethacrylate viscosity index improvers on friction and wear of lubricant formulations. SAE Technical Paper, 2007-01-1985 (2007)Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Cosimbescu, L., Robinson, J.W., Zhou, Y., Qu, J.: Dual functional star polymers for lubricants. RCS Adv. 6, 86259 (2016)Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    ASTM D97-17a: Standard test method for pour point of petroleum products. Technical report, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2017)Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Pennewiss, H., Jost, H., Knoell, H.: Pour point improving additives for mineral oils (September 19 1989). US Patent 4,867,894Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Ahmed, N.S., Nassar, A.M., Nasser, R.M., Khattab, A.F., Abdel, A.A.A.: Synthesis and evaluation of some polymeric compounds as pour point depressants and viscosity index improvers for lube oil. Pet. Sci. Technol. 26, 1390–1402 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Šoljić Jerbić, I., Parlov Vuković, J., Jukić, A.: Production and application properties of dispersive viscosity index improvers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51(37), 11914–11923 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Ghosh, P., Kumar Saha, D.: Acrylate terpolymers as potential pour point depressant and viscosity modifiers for lube oil. Pet. Sci. Technol. 33, 1126–1132 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Kiovsky, T.E.: Star-shaped polymer reacted with dicarboxylic acid and amine as dispersant viscosity index improver (February 27 1979). US Patent 4,141,847Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Mohamed, M.M., Abou El Naga, H.H., El Meneir, M.F.: Multifunctional viscosity index improvers. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 60(3), 283–289 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Sutherland, R.J.: Dispersant viscosity index improvers (July 4 2000). US Patent 6,083,888Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Gutierrez, A., Brownawell, D.W., Bloch, R., Johnston, J.E.: Ethylene copolymer viscosity index improver-dispersant additive useful in oil compositions (December 30 1986). US Patent 4,632,769Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Gardiner, J.B., Dick, M.N.: Viscosity index improver–dispersant additive useful in oil compositions (October 25 1988). US Patent 4,780,228Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Sauer, R.P., Groeger, N.W.: Multiple function dispersant viscosity index improver (April 18 2017). US Patent 9,624,451Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Carabell, K.D., Miller, J.R.: Synergistic lubricating oil composition containing a mixture of olefin copolymer dispersant-type viscosity improver and amine compound (July 27 2017). US Patent App. 15/411,123Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Sniderman, D.: The chemistry and function of lubricant additives. Tribol. Lubr. Technol. 73(11), 18–29 (2017)Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Abdel-Azim, A., Nasser, A.M., Ahmed, N.S., Kamal, R.S.: Multifunctional lube oil additives based on octadecene-maleic anhydride copolymer. Pet. Sci. Technol. 29(1), 97–107 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Nalesnik, T.E.: Novel VI improver, dispersant, and anti-oxidant additive and lubricating oil composition containing same (September 5 1989). US Patent 4,863,623Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of California MercedMercedUSA

Personalised recommendations