Tribology Letters

, 66:57 | Cite as

Wear Resistance of Coated SAE 305 Aluminum Alloy Under Dry Friction Reciprocate Sliding

  • M. S. T. Pires
  • T. Doca
  • V. F. Steier
  • W. M. da Silva
  • M. M. Oliveira Júnior
Original Paper


This work investigates the influence of two coatings on the wear resistance of the SAE 305 aluminum alloy. This material is widely used in power transmission components, and improvement in its surface properties can lead to remarkable impacts in the energy sector. The tested treatments are: (1) anodization and (2) diamond-like carbon coating. Dry friction reciprocate sliding tests using a sphere-on-plane configuration are presented. The untreated reference surface and both treatments are evaluated regarding their roughness, hardness, coefficient of friction, wear rate and morphology. The surface analyzes were carried out using confocal laser and SEM techniques. In comparison with the reference, the diamond-like carbon coating showed a significantly higher wear resistance, whereas the anodization process showed only a minor improvement.


Wear resistance SAE 305 aluminum alloy Anodization Diamond-like carbon 



The authors would like to acknowledge the Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials (IWM) for the deposition of the DLC coatings. We also thank Capes/Brazil for partially funding this research.


  1. 1.
    Sabatini, G., Ceschini, L., Martini, C., Williams, J.A., Hutchings, I.M.: Improving sliding and abrasive wear behaviour of cast A356 and wrought AA7075 aluminium alloys by plasma electrolytic oxidation. Mater. Des. 31, 816–828 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malayoglu, U., Tekin, K.C., Malayoglu, U., Shrestha, S.: An investigation into the mechanical and tribological properties of plasma electrolytic oxidation and hard-anodized coatings on 6082 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. 528, 7451–7460 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tseng, C.C., Lee, J.L., Kuo, T.H., Kuo, S.N., Tseng, K.H.: The influence of sodium tungstate concentration and anodizing conditions on microarc oxidation (MAO) coatings for aluminum alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 206, 3437–3443 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rawlins, C.B.: EPRI Transmission Line Reference Book: Wind-Induced Conductor Motion (Orange Book). Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto (1979)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Azevedo, C.R.F., Henriques, A.M.D., Pulino Filho, A.R., Ferreira, J.L.A., Araújo, J.A.: Fretting fatigue in overhead conductors: rig design and failure analysis of a grosbeak aluminium cable steel reinforced conductor. Eng. Fail. Anal. 16, 136–151 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steier, V.F., Badibanga, R.K., Da Silva, C.R.M., Nogueira, M.M., Araújo, J.A.: Effect of chromium nitride coatings and cryogenic treatments on wear and fretting fatigue resistance of aluminum. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 116, 322–329 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holmberg, K., Matthews, A.: Coatings Tribology—Properties, Techniques and Applications in Surface Engineering. Elsevier Tribology Series, Amsterdam (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burakowiski, T., Wierzchón, T.: Surface Engineering of Metals—Principles, Equipment and Technologies. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henley, V.F.: Anodic Oxidation of Aluminum and Its Alloys. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cirik, E., Genel, K.: Effect of anodic oxidation on fatigue performance of 7075–T6 alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 202, 5190–5201 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pritchard, C., Robinson, P.R.: Abrasion resistance of hard anodized aluminum. Wear 13, 361–368 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Campbell, W.J.: Anodic finishes for wear resistance. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Anodizing (Nottingham, 1961), pp. 137–149. Aluminium Federation, London (1962)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Voevodin, A.A., Yerokhin, A.L., Lyubimov, V.V., Donley, M.S., Zabinski, J.S.: Characterization of wear protective Al-Si-0 coatings formed on Al-based alloys by micro-arc discharge treatment. Surf. Coat. Technol. 86–87, 516–521 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robertson, J.: Diamond-like amorphous carbon. Mater. Sci. Eng. 37, 129–281 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sánches-Lópes, J., Donnet, C., Loubet, J.L., Belin, M., Grill, A., Patel, V., Jahnes, C.: Tribological and mechanical properties of diamond-like carbon prepared by high-density plasma. Diam. Relat. Mater. 10, 1063–1069 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vetter, J., Barbezat, G., Crummenauer, J., Avissar, J.: Surface treatment selections for automotive applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200, 1062–1968 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pagnoux, G., Fouvry, S., Peigney, M., Delattre, B., Mermaz-Rollet, G.: A model for single asperity perturbation on lubricated sliding contact with dlc-coated solids. Tribol. Int. 82, 423–430 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hutchings, I.M.: Tribology—Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials. Edward Arnold, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hauert, R.: An overview on the tribological behavior of diamond-like carbon in technical and medical applications. Tribol. Int. 37, 991–1003 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhowmick, S., Banerji, A., Khan, M.Z.U., Lukitsch, M.J., Alpas, A.T.: High temperature tribological behavior of tetrahedral amorphous carbon (ta-C) and fluorinated ta-C coatings against aluminum alloys. Surf. Coat. Technol. 284, 14–25 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Forsich, C., Dipolt, C., Heim, D., Mueller, T., Gebeshuber, A., Holecek, R., Lugmair, C.: Potential of thick a-C:H: Si films as substitute for chromium plating. Surf. Coat. Technol. 241, 86–92 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kreines, L., Halperin, G., Etsion, I., Varenberg, M., Hoffman, A., Akhvlediani, R.: Fretting wear of thin diamond films deposited on steel substrates. Diam. Relat. Mater. 13, 1731–1739 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miao, W.F., Laughlin, D.E.: A differential scanning calorimetry study of aluminum alloy 6111 with different pre-aging treatments. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 19, 201–203 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Belin, M., Martin, J.M.: Triboscopy, a new approach to surface degradations of thin films. Wear 156, 151–160 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Belin, M., Lopez, J., Martin, J.M.: Triboscopy, a quantitative tool for the study of wear of a coated material. Surf. Coat. Technol. 70, 27–31 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Mello, J.D.B., Gonçalves, J.L., Costa, H.L.: Influence of surface texturing and hard chromium coating on the wear of steels used in cold rolling mill rolls. Wear 302, 1295–1309 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gee, M.G., Gant, A.J., Hutchings, I.M., Kusano, Y., Schiffman, K., Acker, K.V., Poulat, S., Gachon, Y., Stebut, J.V., Hatto, P., Plint, G.: Results from an interlaboratory exercise to validate the micro-scale abrasion test. Wear 259, 27–35 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gahr, K.H.Z.: Wear by hard particles. Tribol. Int. 31, 587–596 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hanief, M., Wani, M.F.: Effect of surface roughness on wear rate during running-in of En31-steel: model and experimental validation. Mater. Lett. 176, 91–93 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, Z., Zhou, Q.: Applying a population growth model to simulate wear of rough surfaces during running-in. Wear 294–295, 356–363 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gahr, K.H.Z.: Modelling of two-body abrasive wear. Wear 124, 87–103 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guezmil, M., Bensalah, W., Khalladi, A., Elleuch, K., Depetris-Wery, M., Ayedi, H.F.: Friction coefficient and microhardness of anodized aluminum alloys under different elaboration conditions. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. 25, 1950–1960 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stachowiak, G.W.: Wear—Materials, Mechanisms and Practice. Wiley, London (2006)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Horng, J.H., Len, M.L.: The contact characteristics of rough surfaces in line contact during running-in process. Wear 253, 899–913 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dos Santos, M.B., Costa, H.L., De Mello, J.D.B.: Potentiality of triboscopy to monitor friction and wear. Wear 332–333, 1134–1144 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Costa, H.L., Oliveira Júnior, M.M., De Mello, J.D.B.: Effect of debris size on the reciprocating sliding wear of aluminium. Wear 376–377, 1399–1410 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sherrington, I., Hayhurst, P.: Silmultaneos observation of the evolution of debris density and friction coefficient in dry sliding steel contacts. Wear 249, 182–187 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sheasby, J.S., Vandergeest, J.H.: Debris control in dry wear testing. Wear 73, 283–294 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Viáfara, C.C., Sinatora, A.: Unlubricated sliding friction and wear of steels: an evaluation of the mechanism responsible for the T1 wear regime transition. Wear 271, 1689–1700 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Adachi, K., Hutchings, I.M.: Wear-mode mapping for the micro-scale abrasion test. Wear 255, 23–29 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sedriks, A.J., Mulhearn, T.O.: Mechanics of cutting and rubbing in simulates abrasive process. Wear 6, 457–466 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gooddard, J., Wilman, H.: A theory of friction and wear during the abrasion of metals. Wear 2, 114–135 (1961)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Da Silva, W.M., Costa, H.L., De Mello, J.D.B.: Transitions in abrasive wear mechanisms: effect of the superimposition of interactions. Wear 271, 977–986 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Adachi, K., Hutchings, I.M.: Sensitivity of wear rates in the micro-scale abrasion test to test conditions and material hardness. Wear 258(1–4), 318–321 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Trezona, R.I., Allsopp, D.N., Hutchings, I.M.: Transitions between two-body and three-body abrasive wear: influence of tests conditions in the microscale abrasive wear test. Wear 225–229, 205–214 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gomez, V.A.O., de Macêdo, M.C.S., Souza, R.M., Scandian, C.: Effect of abrasive particle size distribution on the wear rate and wear mode in micro-scale abrasive wear tests. Wear 328–329, 563–568 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFederal Institute of GoiásGoiâniaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFederal University de UberlândiaUberlândiaBrazil

Personalised recommendations